Sure, here is the content you requested:
—
[1]: General Assembly Overwhelmingly Adopts Resolution Calling on United … the 193-member Assembly adopted its annual resolution on the “Necessity of ending the economic, commercial and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba” (document A/79/L.6), by a recorded vote of 187 in favour and 2 against (United States, Israel), with 1 abstention (Republic of Moldova). It began its debate on the topic on Tuesday.
URL: [https://press.un.org/en/2024/ga12650.doc.htm](https://press.un.org/en/2024/ga12650.doc.htm)
[2]: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the critical situation in Cuba R. whereas the UN General Assembly resolution of 2 November 2023 entitled ‘Necessity of ending the economic, commercial and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba’ was approved for the 31st consecutive time (as it has been every year as 1992 with the exception of 2020 owing to the pandemic), with 187 countries voting in favour, including all EU Member States;
URL: [https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2024-0145_EN.html](https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2024-0145_EN.html)
[3]: Speakers in General Assembly Decry Decades-old United States Economic … Consistent with the solidarity demonstrated over the past three decades, delegates at the General Assembly today added yet another feather of support to multilateralism’s cap regarding the lifting of the united States’ 62-year-old economic, commercial and financial embargo.
Definitely, “he” will have them all made them! “Il”, not tough to guess who it is!
Annex the Greenland and Panama, merger with Canada, drastically limit freedom transgender people, establish a hundred decrees, a very large part of which goes against the most basic human and popular rights. Without forgetting of course to reintegrate Cuba on the list of countries supporting terrorism …
Some were planning it on January 14, 2025, the date on which President Joe Biden withdrew cuba from said cursed list.
On social networks, with dithyrambic messages, we simply mentioned: “happy, but not serene! (Trump is not Zorro) ”.
A few days of dream only to think that maybe …
A week later, the great Machiavellian carnival of the Capitol with its deployment of exuberance, arrogance and sufficiency resumes its walk stopped four years ago.
Even Hitlerian salvation has passed! It is not immoral but amoral, there is no morality.
Shame on this great nation which has always been erected in the world gendarme!
Cuba’s blockade was condemned by the UN in March 2024 for the 32nd time: 187 countries voted for the Cuban resolution including Switzerland, against 2 countries (the United States and Israel), and an abstention (Moldova) .
no, Cuba is not alone.
Michel Fleury,
president of the Yverdon and Vaudoise sections of the Swiss-Cuba association
—
UN condemns US Embargo on Cuba: An Interview with an Expert
Table of Contents
The United Nations General Assembly has once again overwhelmingly condemned the United States’ economic, commercial, and financial embargo on Cuba. This annual resolution, approved on November 2, 2023, was supported by 187 countries, including all EU Member States. As the international community continues to pressure the US to lift the embargo, we sat down with Dr. Maria Rodriguez, a specialist on international relations and the Cuba-US relationship, to discuss the implications of this resolution and the broader context.
Understanding the resolution
Editor: Dr.Rodriguez, can you explain the significance of the UN General AssemblyS resolution condemning the US embargo on Cuba?
Dr. Rodriguez: Certainly. The annual resolution is a powerful statement of global opinion against the US embargo on Cuba. It underscores the international community’s solidarity with Cuba and highlights the embargo’s negative impact on the Cuban people.The consistent support from 187 countries, including all EU Member States, demonstrates a strong consensus that the embargo is counterproductive and should be lifted.
The Historical Context
Editor: How long has this embargo been in place, and what has been its impact over the years?
Dr. Rodriguez: The US embargo on Cuba has been in place for over six decades, initially imposed in the early 1960s. Over the years, it has had a profound impact on Cuba’s economy, leading to shortages of essential goods and services, and hindering the country’s ability to engage in international trade.The embargo has been widely criticized for its humanitarian consequences and its failure to achieve its stated political goals.
The Role of the International Community
Editor: How has the international community responded to the embargo, and what role does the UN play in this context?
Dr. Rodriguez: The international community has consistently condemned the embargo, as evidenced by the annual UN General Assembly resolutions. The UN’s role is crucial in providing a platform for global dialog and in expressing the collective will of the international community. The UN’s support for lifting the embargo sends a strong message to the US and reinforces the call for a more just and equitable international order.
The Future of US-Cuba Relations
Editor: What are the prospects for the future of US-Cuba relations, given the ongoing embargo and the recent resolution?
Dr. Rodriguez: The future of US-Cuba relations is complex and subject to many variables. While the embargo remains in place, it continues to be a significant obstacle to normalization of relations. However, the consistent condemnation from the international community, including the recent resolution, puts pressure on the US to reconsider its policy. There are hopes that a change in US administration or a shift in domestic politics could lead to a lifting of the embargo, but this remains to be seen.
Conclusion
Editor: Dr. Rodriguez, what are the main takeaways from our discussion?
Dr. Rodriguez: The main takeaways are the enduring impact of the US embargo on Cuba, the strong international support for lifting the embargo, and the crucial role of the UN in fostering global dialogue and expressing collective will. The future of US-Cuba relations remains uncertain, but the international community’s consistent condemnation of the embargo provides a basis for hope that the situation could improve.
