Hear’s a summary of the ETF fee details from the provided sources:
- ProShares ETF Fees: ProShares, one of the pioneers in leveraged and inverse ETFs, charges fees just south of 1% on average. This has remained consistent since their inception in 2006,despite competition from other firms like direxion.
- Vanguard and Fidelity ETF fees: Vanguard has been reducing its ETF fees, with its U.S. sector ETFs now priced at 0.09%. Fidelity offers similar sector ETFs at an even lower fee of 0.08%. This makes Vanguard’s fees comparable to Fidelity’s and puts them among the cheapest in the industry.
- ETF Fees vs. Advisory Fees: ETF fees are tax-deductible, unlike advisory fees. This means that a 1% advisory fee on a $1 million portfolio results in a $10,000 pre-tax expense, whereas the same fee for an ETF is a post-tax expense.
- Total Expense Ratio (TER): Investors should consider the TER when comparing ETFs, as it includes not only the total remuneration (management fee) but also other costs and trading/brokerage fees. For example, the TER for ‘SOL US S&P500’ is 0.0099%.
Here’s a comparison of fees from the sources:
- ProShares: ~1%
- Vanguard: 0.09%
- Fidelity: 0.08%
- ‘SOL US S&P500’: 0.0099% (TER)
Comparing ETF Commissions and Their Impact
Table of Contents
When it comes to Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) tracking the S&P 500, the commission structure can significantly impact long-term investments. The Average Commission Effect (ACE) for the SOL US S&P 500 stands at 0.07%. In terms of total payments, the commission for the SOL US S&P 500 appears lower, yet both ETFs share the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.14%.
Long-Term Fee Implications
The difference in commissions between ETF products, though minor in decimal units, can grow substantially over time. As an example, investing 10 million won in an ETF following the S&P 500 for a decade can result in varying fees depending on the asset manager. The TIGER US S&P 500, which has the lowest TER, will incur a total charge of 108,000 won. Conversely, the HANARO US S&P 500, with the highest TER, will cost 868,000 won—over 760,000 won more than the TIGER US S&P 500.
Hedging and Long-Term Yields
Hedging is another critical factor affecting long-term yields. With increasing exchange rate volatility due to global situations, hedged ETFs eliminate the influence of currency fluctuations. Thes are easily identifiable by the ‘(H)’ suffix in their names.
Performance of Hedged vs. Unhedged ETFs
In recent years, the performance gap between unhedged and hedged ETFs has widened significantly. Such as, the KODEX US 500, an unhedged ETF, rose by 34.96% over the past year. This yield was 13.88 percentage points higher than the KODEX US 500 (H), which rose by 21.08%. This performance difference is largely due to the strengthening of the dollar.
Expert Advice on Long-term Investments
Experts recommend investing in unhedged ETFs for long-term gains, especially for products tracking the US representative index. an asset manager official noted, “Investing in the US representative index ETF is investing in the long-term growth of the US economy, so it is better to invest in the long-term exposure type.”
Conclusion
Choosing the right ETF involves considering both commission structures and hedging strategies. While lower commissions can save costs over the long term, unhedged ETFs may offer higher returns due to favorable currency movements. Therefore, investors should weigh these factors carefully to optimize their portfolios.
Expert Interview on Investing in ETFs: Costs, Hedging, and Long-Term Strategies
In this interview, we delve into the nuances of ETF investing, focusing on cost structures, hedging strategies, and expert advice for long-term gains. Our interviewee offers valuable insights to help investors make informed decisions.
Investing 10 million won in an ETF following the S&P 500 for a decade can result in varying fees depending on the asset manager. The TIGER US S&P 500, which has the lowest TER, will incur a total charge of 108,000 won. Conversely, the HANARO US S&P 500, with the highest TER, will cost 868,000 won—over 760,000 won more than the TIGER US S&P 500.
hedging and Long-Term Yields
Hedging is another critical factor affecting long-term yields. With increasing exchange rate volatility due to global situations,hedged ETFs eliminate the influence of currency fluctuations. These are easily identifiable by the ‘(H)’ suffix in their names.
Performance of Hedged vs. Unhedged ETFs
In recent years, the performance gap between unhedged and hedged ETFs has widened substantially. Such as, the KODEX US 500, an unhedged ETF, rose by 34.96% over the past year. This yield was 13.88 percentage points higher than the KODEX US 500 (H), which rose by 21.08%. This performance difference is largely due to the strengthening of the dollar.
Expert Advice on Long-term Investments
Experts recommend investing in unhedged ETFs for long-term gains, especially for products tracking the US representative index. An asset manager official noted, “Investing in the US representative index ETF is investing in the long-term growth of the US economy, so it is better to invest in the long-term exposure type.”
Conclusion
Choosing the right ETF involves considering both commission structures and hedging strategies. While lower commissions can save costs over the long term, unhedged ETFs may offer higher returns due to favorable currency movements. Therefore, investors should weigh these factors carefully to optimize their portfolios.
