Based on the provided web search results,here are the key points from President Donald Trump’s plan for Gaza:
- Vision for Gaza: Trump wants to transform the Gaza Strip into the “Riviera of the Middle east,” aiming for a significant redevelopment of the region [1[1[1[1].
- U.S. Involvement: the plan involves the U.S. “taking over” Gaza, with Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu detailing the proposal at a White House press conference [3[3[3[3].
- Relocation of palestinians: The proposal requires relocating Palestinians to nearby countries, a move that has sparked controversy and criticism [2[2[2[2].
- Reactions: The plan has divided opinions, with some viewing it as a bold but potentially unfeasible approach to resolving the long-standing conflict in the region [3[3[3[3].
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese should definitely respond to this proposal, given its significant implications for the Middle East and potential impacts on regional stability and international relations. His response could provide valuable insights into Australia’s stance on the issue and contribute to the global dialogue on the conflict.
Unraveling the Truth: The Belle Gibson Story
Table of Contents
- Unraveling the Truth: The Belle Gibson Story
- Key Points: The Belle Gibson saga
- The impact and Legacy
- Conclusion
- Rupert Murdoch and Donald Trump: A Complex Relationship
- Controversial Podcast Episode Sparks Backlash and Antagonistic Exchange
- Conclusion
- Sam Newman’s Controversial Podcast Interview with Far-Right Extremists
- Sam Newman’s Controversial Podcast Interview with Far-Right extremists
Ten years ago, a tip arrived in the laps of young Nine newspaper reporters Nick Toscano and Beau Donelly, whispering that famed wellness icon Belle Gibson – who claimed to have healed her brain cancer solely through diet – was not telling the truth. This tip would set off a chain of events that would lead to a series of investigative stories, a book, and now a Netflix drama titled Apple Cider Vinegar, set to release on February 6.
At first, the reporters were skeptical. “I started that call feeling very critical, almost dismissive of her claims,” donelly told the Age and SMH’s Morning Edition. However, as they delved deeper, they became increasingly fascinated by the story.
!Belle Gibson Leaving Court
Belle Gibson (center) leaves the federal court in Melbourne on 20 June 2019. Photograph: David Crosling/AAP
“I came away from it absolutely fascinated by what she was saying,” Toscano recounted. “She struck me as someone who was very smart, and who was just horrified, really, for the role she had played in supporting Belle Gibson, who she now believed was a cancer faker.”
Their initial investigation revealed that the Instagram star had raised funds for charity from her followers but did not donate the money. This revelation brought Gibson’s health claims – the foundation of her wellness business, cookbook (The Whole Pantry), and app – under increased scrutiny. Soon, her claims began to unravel.
Their first story in 2015 sparked a wave of skepticism and investigation. Gibson’s claims of healing through diet and her subsequent business ventures were put under a microscope. The reporters’ persistence and thorough investigation lead to a deeper understanding of the extent of Gibson’s deceptions.
Key Points: The Belle Gibson saga
| year | Event |
|——|——-|
| 2013 | Belle Gibson claims to have healed her brain cancer through diet. |
| 2015 | Reporters nick Toscano and beau Donelly publish their first story revealing Gibson’s fundraising deception. |
| 2017 | The book The Woman Who Fooled the World is published, detailing the investigative journey. |
| 2019 | Gibson appears in federal court. |
| 2023 | Netflix releases apple Cider Vinegar, a drama inspired by Gibson’s story.|
The impact and Legacy
The story of Belle Gibson has become a cautionary tale in the wellness industry. It highlights the importance of critical thinking and the dangers of believing claims without considerable evidence. The Netflix drama apple Cider Vinegar aims to bring this story to a wider audience, offering insights into the complexities of deception and the power of investigative journalism.
For those interested in the original investigative work, the book The Woman Who Fooled the World provides a extensive look into the case. It is available on The Guardian.
Conclusion
The Belle Gibson story is a testament to the power of investigative journalism. Through diligent work and a commitment to uncovering the truth, reporters like Nick Toscano and Beau Donelly were able to expose a web of deceit that had captivated the public. As the Netflix drama Apple Cider Vinegar prepares to hit screens, it serves as a reminder of the importance of questioning claims and the role of journalism in holding those in the public eye accountable.
For more on the story, visit The Guardian and SMH Morning Edition.
Rupert Murdoch and Donald Trump: A Complex Relationship
Rupert Murdoch, the Australian-born media mogul, has had a complicated relationship with former U.S.President Donald Trump.Despite their mutual admiration, the two have frequently enough found themselves at odds over various issues, particularly economic policies.
A History of Disagreements
Murdoch and Trump have had their fair share of disagreements. In 2018, it was reported that Murdoch had described Trump as “a fucking idiot” over his immigration policy.This revelation underscored the tension between the two powerful figures. Murdoch also criticized Trump’s actions on January 6, labeling them “pretty much a crime,” according to court documents. Despite these differences, Murdoch has been known to return to Trump’s side, especially when the former president has emerged as the clear leader in the Republican primaries.
Economic Policy Disagreements
One of the most recent points of contention between Murdoch and Trump was over economic policy. Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal published an editorial calling Trump’s proposed tariffs against China, Canada, and Mexico the “dumbest trade war in history.” This characterization did not sit well with Trump,who took to Truth Social to express his displeasure. In his post,Trump wrote,“the ‘Tariff Lobby,’ headed by the Globalist,and always wrong,Wall Street Journal,is working hard to justify Countries like Canada,Mexico,China,and too many others to name,continue the decades-long practice of ripping off the United States.”
Mutual Respect Despite Differences
Despite these disagreements, both Murdoch and Trump have expressed mutual respect for each other. Murdoch has praised Trump as an “amazing guy,” while Trump has reciprocated the admiration. Their relationship is a testament to the complex dynamics of political and business alliances.
Research Challenges
Journalists Donelly and Toscano faced significant challenges while researching their book. They described the process as “like pulling out teeth,” with many people unwilling to speak to them. Toscano noted, “Her name was poison. I can’t think of another story I’ve covered that’s been so difficult to get people to speak to me.” Donelly added, “We were shut down by dozens and dozens of people.we were threatened with lawsuits by others. It was incredibly difficult.”
Summary of Key Points
| Aspects of Murdoch and Trump’s Relationship | Key Details |
|——————————————–|————-|
| Mutual Respect | Both have praised each other despite disagreements. |
| Economic Policy Disagreements | Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal criticized Trump’s tariffs. |
| Immigration Policy Criticism | Murdoch described Trump as “a fucking idiot” over immigration. |
| Research Challenges | Donelly and Toscano faced significant hurdles while researching their book. |
Conclusion
The relationship between Rupert Murdoch and Donald Trump is a fascinating study in political and business dynamics. Despite their differences, they have maintained a complex yet mutually beneficial alliance. As both figures continue to influence the political and media landscapes, their relationship will likely remain a subject of interest and scrutiny.
Call to Action
For more insights into the intricate world of political and media alliances, stay tuned to our latest updates. Follow us on social media and subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive content and analysis.
Controversial Podcast Episode Sparks Backlash and Antagonistic Exchange
In a surprising turn of events, former Australian media personality Sam Newman found himself at the center of a storm after hosting far-right extremists Blair Cottrell and Thomas Sewell on his podcast. The episode initially seemed to pass without incident, but a subsequent image posted to X (formerly known as Twitter) triggered a significant backlash, prompting Newman to distance himself from the duo in a subsequent podcast.
initial Reactions and Backlash
Sam Newman, known for his outspoken nature, initially appeared unbothered by the presence of Cottrell and Sewell on his show.However, the image shared on X showcasing the trio together sparked widespread criticism. The public outcry was swift and severe, with many calling for Newman to publicly denounce the extremists’ views.
Newman’s Response and Accusations
In response to the backlash, Newman released a second podcast where he vehemently insisted that he did not endorse the views of cottrell and Sewell. He went on to label Cottrell an “interloper,” an “opportunist,” a “24-carrot-gold scumbag,” and a “star fucker.” This harsh rhetoric underscored the depth of Newman’s disdain for Cottrell following the public reaction.
Key Players and Their Roles
- Sam Newman: A well-known figure in Australian media, Newman has a history of making controversial statements.
- Blair Cottrell: A prominent far-right extremist who has been suspended from X for his views.
- Thomas Sewell: Another figure associated with far-right ideologies, appearing alongside Cottrell on Newman’s podcast.
The role of social media in amplifying public opinion cannot be understated.The image posted on X acted as a catalyst for the backlash, highlighting the growing sensitivity around associating with extremist figures. This incident underscores the power of social media in shaping public discourse and holding public figures accountable for their actions.
Summary of Key Points
| Aspect | Details |
|————————-|————————————————————————-|
| Initial Reaction | Newman initially seemed unbothered by hosting extremists. |
| Backlash Trigger | An image posted on X sparked widespread criticism. |
| Newman’s Response | Newman released a second podcast denouncing Cottrell. |
| Social Media Impact | Social media played a crucial role in amplifying the backlash. |
Conclusion
The episode involving Sam Newman, Blair Cottrell, and Thomas Sewell serves as a reminder of the delicate balance public figures must maintain when engaging with controversial figures. The incident also highlights the significant influence of social media in shaping public opinion and holding individuals accountable for their actions. As the conversation around extremism continues to evolve, it is essential for public figures to be mindful of the potential consequences of their associations.
Sam Newman’s Controversial Podcast Interview with Far-Right Extremists
In a recent episode of his podcast, Sam Newman invited far-right extremists Blair Cottrell and Thomas Sewell as guests. This decision has sparked significant controversy and criticism. Despite the backlash, Newman defended his actions, stating that he aims to engage with individuals of interest to foster dialogue.
The Interview: A Platform for Extremist Views
During the 54-minute podcast, Newman allowed Cottrell and Sewell to express their views without interruption. He encouraged them to speak at length, stating, “You speak for as long as you like. When you’re finished, I’ll ask you a question because I don’t want to interrupt you.” This approach gave the extremists a platform to discuss topics such as Holocaust denialism, conspiracy theories, antisemitism, and white.
Newman’s Response to Criticism
following the interview, newman faced intense criticism for platforming such extremist views. In response,he insisted that listeners should hear the interview for themselves to understand his perspective. “Listen to the interview in the first podcast, he insisted, as it shows I’m not on their side,” Newman said.
Cottrell’s Counterattack
Blair Cottrell, one of the interviewees, responded to Newman’s criticism by stating, “You wanted controversy Sam, and you got it.” Cottrell also claimed that Newman “naively believed he could interview blacklisted ‘Nazis’ with impunity.”
Media Watch Returns
Meanwhile, Media Watch is back for 2025, and it continues to attract attention from media watchers. Columnist Chris Kenny wrote a piece about the show’s debut, stating, “Not much has changed at the ABC’s Media Watch.”
key Points Summary
| Aspect | Details |
|—————————–|————————————————————————-|
| Interview Duration | 54 minutes |
| Newman’s Approach | Encouraged guests to speak without interruption |
| Criticism | Faced intense backlash for platforming extremist views |
| Cottrell’s Response | Claimed Newman sought controversy |
| Media watch | Returned for 2025, attracting media attention |
Conclusion
Sam Newman’s decision to host Blair cottrell and Thomas Sewell on his podcast has ignited a firestorm of controversy. Despite the criticism, Newman stands by his decision, encouraging listeners to hear the full context of the conversation. As Media Watch returns for another season, it remains a focal point for media scrutiny and analysis.
For more insights into this story, visit Guardian Australia.Here’s a summary of the key points from the text:
- Sky’s Revenue: Sky, a local television network, generated $US17 million ($27 million) in revenue in the last three months of 2024. Its revenue stream was “flat compared to the prior year,” indicating neither exceptional growth nor decline.
- Challenges: Broadcasters, print, and digital news services are facing challenges due to the current inflationary period and businesses trying to rein in costs.
- Foxtel Sale: News Corp sold Foxtel, a previously housed pay television service, to a sports streaming service for $US22 billion. Analysts view this sale positively as Foxtel was “structurally challenged” due to the rise of streaming services.
- Revenue Increase: News Corp reported a 5% revenue increase in the quarter to $US2.24 billion ($3.6 billion), driven by strong gains in its Dow Jones unit, book publishing, and digital real estate assets.
- News Corp Australia: This division, which includes The Australian, saw a modest slide in subscription and advertising revenues over the past year, despite increased digital subscriptions.
- Share Price: News Corp’s share price has increased by about one-third over the past 12 months, driven by the strong performance of its other business units.
Sam Newman’s Controversial Podcast Interview with Far-Right extremists
The Interview: A Platform for Extremist Views
In a recent episode of his podcast, Sam Newman invited far-right extremists Blair Cottrell and thomas Sewell as guests. This decision has sparked meaningful controversy and criticism. Despite the backlash, Newman defended his actions, stating that he aims to engage with individuals of interest to foster dialogue.
During the 54-minute podcast,Newman allowed Cottrell and Sewell to express their views without interruption. He encouraged them to speak at length, stating, ”You speak for as long as you like. When you’re finished, I’ll ask you a question as I don’t want to interrupt you.” This approach gave the extremists a platform to discuss topics such as Holocaust denialism,conspiracy theories,antisemitism,and white.
Newman’s Response to Criticism
Following the interview,Newman faced intense criticism for platforming such extremist views. In response,he insisted that listeners should hear the interview for themselves to understand his outlook. “Listen to the interview in the first podcast, he insisted, as it shows I’m not on their side,” Newman said.
Cottrell’s Counterattack
Blair cottrell, one of the interviewees, responded to Newman’s criticism by stating, “You wanted controversy Sam, and you got it.” Cottrell also claimed that Newman “naively believed he could interview blacklisted ‘Nazis’ with impunity.”
Media Watch Returns
Meanwhile, Media Watch is back for 2025, and it continues to attract attention from media watchers. Columnist Chris Kenny wrote a piece about the show’s debut, stating, “Not much has changed at the ABC’s Media watch.”
Key Points Summary
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Interview Duration | 54 minutes |
| Newman’s Approach | Encouraged guests to speak without interruption |
| Criticism | Faced intense backlash for platforming extremist views |
| Cottrell’s Response | Claimed Newman sought controversy |
| Media Watch | Returned for 2025, attracting media attention |
Conclusion
Sam Newman’s decision to host Blair Cottrell and Thomas Sewell on his podcast has ignited a firestorm of controversy. Despite the criticism, Newman stands by his decision, encouraging listeners to hear the full context of the conversation. As Media Watch returns for another season,it remains a focal point for media scrutiny and analysis.
For more insights into this story, visit Guardian Australia.
