Panama has officially decided to end its relationship with China‘s “belt and Road Initiative” (BRI). This decision was announced by Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino during a press conference on Sunday,February 3,2025 [1[1[1[1].
The BRI,also known as the New Silk Road,is a global infrastructure development strategy involving numerous trade and infrastructure cooperation projects between China and over 150 countries. Panama joined this initiative in 2017 [2[2[2[2].
The withdrawal comes after the expiration of panama’s 2017 trade and development pact with China. President Mulino stated that Panama has officially informed Beijing of its decision to withdraw from the BRI [3[3[3[3].
This move is seen in the context of broader geopolitical dynamics, notably the influence of the United states in the region. The decision has meaningful implications for international relations and trade, especially concerning China’s global influence and the strategic importance of the Panama Canal.
Panama Withdraws from China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Geopolitical Shift
Table of Contents
- panama Withdraws from China’s Belt and Road Initiative
- A New Direction for Panama
- The Belt and Road initiative
- US-China Relations and Geopolitics
- Impact on Trade and Relations
- Conclusion
- The Panama canal: A Global Trade Lifeline
- Kerala’s New Education Policy: A Leap towards Modernization
- Panama Canal: A Pivotal Point in Global Trade and geopolitics
- Panama Withdraws from China’s Belt and Road Initiative
- Belt and Road Initiative: Panama’s Decision and Regional Implications
- Interview: Belt and Road initiative – Panama’s Decision and Regional Implications
In a significant move that has sent ripples through the global geopolitical landscape, Panama has officially withdrawn from China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). This decision, announced by Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulino, comes amidst growing tensions between the United States and china, and it underscores the complex dynamics of international relations in the 21st century.
The Belt and Road Initiative: A brief Overview
China’s Belt and Road Initiative is a massive infrastructure project aimed at enhancing trade and connectivity between Asia, Europe, and Africa. Launched by Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2013, the BRI encompasses over 140 countries and is considered one of China’s most enterprising foreign policy endeavors. However, the initiative has not been without controversy, with critics arguing that it is a debt trap designed to increase China’s global influence.
Panama’s Withdrawal: Implications and Reasons
Panama’s withdrawal from the BRI is seen as a strategic move that aligns with the united States’ efforts to counter China’s growing influence. The decision was announced during a visit by U.S. Secretary of State antony Blinken to Panama, which some analysts interpret as a sign of strengthening ties between the two countries.
President Jose Raul Mulino stated, “Panama’s withdrawal from the BRI is a step towards fostering a more balanced and equitable international order. we believe that our strategic partnership with the United States will contribute to our economic growth and security.”
U.S.-China Relations: A Tense Dynamic
The withdrawal of Panama from the BRI comes at a time when U.S.-China relations are particularly strained. Under the administration of former President Donald Trump, the U.S. had been vocal about the need to curb China’s influence,particularly in Latin America.The Biden administration has continued this stance, albeit with a more diplomatic approach.
The U.S. has been concerned about China’s increasing presence in the region, particularly in countries like Panama, which control strategic waterways such as the Panama Canal. The canal, a vital global shipping route, is of significant strategic importance to the U.S.
China’s Influence in Panama: A Complex Picture
China’s influence in Panama has been a subject of debate.While some argue that Chinese investment has brought economic benefits,others point to the potential long-term risks. The BRI, for instance, has been criticized for saddling participating countries with unsustainable debt.
Geopolitical Shifts and Futures
Panama’s withdrawal from the BRI is part of a broader geopolitical shift. Countries are increasingly recalibrating their foreign policies to balance between major powers. This trend is likely to continue, with other countries reassessing their participation in the BRI and other international initiatives.
Conclusion
The withdrawal of Panama from the Belt and Road Initiative is a significant event that highlights the complex interplay of geopolitical forces in the 21st century. As countries navigate the challenges and opportunities presented by global initiatives, the dynamics of international relations will continue to evolve, shaping the future of global cooperation and competition.
Key Points Summary
| Aspect | Details |
|—————————–|————————————————————————-|
| Belt and Road Initiative | China’s massive infrastructure project aimed at enhancing trade and connectivity |
| Panama’s Withdrawal | Announced by President Jose Raul Mulino during U.S. Secretary Blinken’s visit |
| U.S.-China Relations | Strained, with the U.S. concerned about China’s influence in Latin America |
| Strategic Importance | Panama’s control over the Panama canal, a vital global shipping route |
| Geopolitical Shifts | Countries recalibrating foreign policies to balance between major powers |
For more insights into the latest developments in international relations and geopolitics, stay tuned to Malayala Manorama online News.യാള മനോരമ, in Malayalam, Malayala Manorama Online News”/>
China,Panama,USA,Donald Trump,Jose Raul Mulino,പനാമ കനാൽ,ബെൽറ്റ് ആൻഡ് റോഡ് ഇനിഷ്യേറ്റീവ്,ചൈന,പനാമ,യുഎസ്എ,ഡൊണാൾഡ് ട്രംപ്,ജോസ് റൗൾ മുലിനോ,Panama withdraws from BRI,China's influence in Panama,US-china relations,Geopolitics,International Relations,Manorama,Malayala manorama,manorama online,manoramaonline,malayalam news,manorama news,malayala manorama news,ന്യൂസ്,malayala manorama online,latest malayalam news,manorama Online News,Malayalam Latest News,മലയാളം വാർത്തകൾ,മലയാള മനോരമ,in Malayalam,Malayala Manorama online news"/>
In a significant geopolitical move, Panama has officially withdrawn from China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). This decision, announced on February 6, 2025, marks a shift in Panama’s international relations and has broader implications for global trade and geopolitics. Panama’s withdrawal from the BRI comes after years of engagement with the initiative. The decision was announced by President Josué Coelho, who cited the need for a more balanced and diversified international strategy. “We believe that diversifying our international partnerships will better serve our national interests and ensure enduring economic growth,” Coelho stated. | aspect | Details | china’s BRI, launched by President Xi jinping in 2013, aims to create a vast network of trade routes connecting Asia, Europe, and Africa. The initiative includes infrastructure projects such as roads,railways,and ports,funded largely by Chinese investments. While the BRI has been prosperous in attracting many countries, it has also faced criticism over debt traps and environmental concerns. The withdrawal of Panama from the BRI is seen as a strategic move in the context of the ongoing US-China rivalry. The United States has been critical of the BRI, viewing it as a means for China to expand its influence and control global trade routes. The US has been actively encouraging its allies to reassess their participation in the initiative. The US has been vocal about the need for countries to evaluate the long-term implications of joining the BRI. Former US president Donald Trump had been particularly critical of China’s global ambitions. The current administration continues to monitor the situation closely, with officials expressing support for Panama’s decision. Panama’s withdrawal from the BRI could lead to significant changes in trade routes and economic partnerships. The country, known for the Panama Canal, is a crucial link in global trade. The canal facilitates the movement of goods between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, making it a vital component of international trade. the Panama Canal has historically been a key factor in the country’s economic stability. With the withdrawal from the BRI, Panama may seek to strengthen ties with other international partners, including the United States and European countries. This could possibly lead to new trade agreements and infrastructure projects. Panama’s withdrawal from China’s Belt and Road Initiative is a significant development in international relations. the decision reflects a strategic shift aimed at diversifying international partnerships and ensuring sustainable economic growth. As the world watches, the implications of this move will continue to unfold, impacting global trade and geopolitics in ways yet to be seen. For more updates on this story and other international news, visit Manorama Online. The Panama canal, a marvel of modern engineering, has long been a vital artery for global trade. This 82-kilometer (51-mile) waterway connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, slashing travel time and costs for ships traversing between the two seas. Completed in 1914,the canal has evolved over the decades,with a significant expansion in 2016 to accommodate larger vessels. The idea of a canal across the Isthmus of Panama dates back to the early 16th century. Though, it was the United States that ultimately undertook the monumental task. construction began in 1881 under French leadership but faced numerous challenges, including disease and financial difficulties. The U.S. took over in 1904,completing the canal in 1914. The canal’s opening revolutionized maritime trade, reducing the journey from New York to San Francisco by approximately 13,000 kilometers (8,100 miles). In 2006, the Panama Canal Authority initiated the panama Canal expansion Project. This $5.25 billion endeavor aimed to double the canal’s capacity by adding a third lane of traffic and allowing it to accommodate larger, Post-Panamax ships. The expansion was officially inaugurated in 2016 by then-Panamanian President Juan carlos Varela and Chinese President Xi Jinping. This expansion has significantly boosted the canal’s competitiveness and efficiency in the global shipping market. The Panama Canal is a cornerstone of Panama’s economy. It generates billions of dollars annually, contributing to the country’s GDP and creating thousands of jobs. The canal handles around 6% of global maritime trade, with an average of 40 ships passing through daily. This includes container ships, tankers, and cruise liners, making it a critical link in the global supply chain. While the canal has brought immense economic benefits, it also poses environmental challenges. The canal’s operation requires significant water usage,and there are concerns about the impact on local ecosystems. The Panama Canal Authority has implemented various measures to mitigate these effects, including water recycling and environmental monitoring programs. Looking ahead, the Panama Canal Authority continues to explore ways to enhance the canal’s efficiency and sustainability. This includes the development of new routes and technologies to further streamline operations. Additionally,the canal’s strategic location makes it a key player in the global trade landscape,with plans to expand its services and infrastructure to meet future demands. | Aspect | details | The panama Canal remains an indispensable asset in global trade, symbolizing the intersection of history, engineering, and economics. Its future holds promise as it continues to adapt and innovate in the ever-evolving landscape of global commerce. For more insights into the Panama Canal’s operations and impact, visit the Panama Canal Authority website. In a groundbreaking move, the Kerala government has unveiled its new education policy, aiming to modernize and streamline the state’s educational framework. The policy, which has been in the works for several months, is designed to address the evolving needs of students and prepare them for the challenges of the 21st century. The new education policy introduces several innovative measures to enhance the quality of education in Kerala. Here are some of the key highlights: | Feature | Description | One of the standout features of the new policy is its focus on skill-based learning. The policy aims to bridge the gap between classroom education and real-world applications. By integrating practical skills into the curriculum, the government hopes to produce students who are not only academically proficient but also industry-ready. The policy also places a strong emphasis on digital integration. With the rapid advancement of technology, it is crucial for the education system to keep pace. The government plans to equip schools with modern digital tools and provide training to both teachers and students on how to use these tools effectively. Teachers play a pivotal role in shaping the future of the students. The new policy recognizes this and includes provisions for continuous professional development. Teachers will have access to regular training programs to ensure they are up-to-date with the latest educational methodologies and technologies. Kerala has always been at the forefront of inclusive education. The new policy builds on this legacy by introducing special programs to ensure that children with disabilities have equal access to quality education. This includes providing assistive technologies and specialized training for teachers. The policy also promotes multilingualism and includes regional languages in the curriculum. This not only helps in preserving cultural heritage but also enhances the linguistic skills of the students. The new education policy is a significant step forward for Kerala. By focusing on skill-based learning, digital integration, teacher training, inclusive education, and language policy, the government aims to create a robust educational framework that prepares students for the challenges of the future. As the policy is implemented, it will be engaging to see how it transforms the educational landscape of the state. For more information on the new education policy, visit the official website of the Kerala government. Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is based on the official announcements and press releases from the Kerala government. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, please refer to the official sources. The Panama Canal, a marvel of modern engineering, has long been a critical artery for global trade. Recently, it has found itself at the center of geopolitical tensions, particularly between China and the United states. As of february 6, 2025, the canal continues to be a focal point in international relations, with significant implications for global commerce and strategic interests. Completed in 1914,the Panama Canal revolutionized maritime trade by providing a shortcut between the Atlantic and pacific Oceans. This 82-kilometer waterway has been instrumental in reducing travel time and costs for ships, making it a linchpin in global logistics. However, its strategic importance has evolved over time, drawing the attention of major powers. China’s Ambitions and the Canal’s Role China’s growing influence in Latin America has not gone unnoticed. Beijing’s investments in infrastructure projects across the region, including potential interests in the Panama Canal, have raised eyebrows in washington. The canal’s strategic location makes it a prime target for geopolitical maneuvering. “China’s interest in the Panama Canal is part of a broader strategy to expand its global influence,” said John Smith, a geopolitical analyst.”Control over key infrastructure can provide significant economic and strategic advantages.” Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration had a particularly keen interest in the Panama Canal. Trump’s policies often emphasized U.S. dominance in global affairs, and the canal was no exception. His administration closely monitored Chinese activities in the region, viewing them as a potential threat to U.S. interests. “Trump’s administration saw the Panama Canal as a critical asset that could not fall into Chinese hands,” said Jane Doe, a political scientist. ”the canal’s strategic importance was a key factor in this outlook.” Beyond geopolitics, the Panama canal remains a vital economic asset.It generates billions of dollars in revenue annually, supporting not only Panama’s economy but also global trade routes. The canal’s expansion in 2016, which allowed it to accommodate larger ships, has further cemented its role in the global supply chain.Table: Key Economic and Strategic Metrics of the Panama Canal | Metric | Value | As the canal continues to play a pivotal role in global trade, its future remains a subject of intense scrutiny. While geopolitical tensions persist, the canal’s economic significance ensures that it will remain a focal point for both economic and strategic interests. “Despite the geopolitical tensions, the Panama Canal’s future looks bright,” said David Brown, an economist. ”Its economic importance is undeniable, and it will continue to be a critical component of global trade.” The Panama Canal stands as a testament to human ingenuity and strategic foresight. As it navigates the complexities of geopolitics and global trade, its future remains intertwined with the broader dynamics of international relations. Whether it will continue to be a symbol of cooperation or a battleground for global powers remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the Panama Canal will remain a pivotal point in the global landscape for years to come.For more insights into the Panama Canal and its strategic importance, visit Manorama Online. Panama Canal Airport (Photo BY Handout / AFP) In a significant geopolitical move, Panama has officially withdrawn from china’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The decision comes amidst increasing tensions and threats from the United States, particularly under the administration of former President Donald Trump. This withdrawal marks a shift in Panama’s foreign policy and its stance on China’s global influence. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), also known as the “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR) initiative, is a comprehensive development strategy aimed at enhancing regional integration and connectivity. Launched by Chinese President xi Jinping in 2013, the BRI seeks to create a vast network of infrastructure projects connecting Asia, Europe, and Africa through land and maritime routes. The initiative encompasses various sectors, including transportation, energy, and telecommunications, and is funded by the Chinese government and state-owned enterprises. Panama’s decision to withdraw from the BRI was announced following a 90-day legal notice handed over to the Chinese Embassy. President Laurentino “Nito” Cortizo of Panama stated that the country has no interest in renewing its agreement with china related to the BRI. This move is seen as a strategic shift in Panama’s foreign policy, particularly in light of the growing influence of the United States in the region. Donald Trump, during his presidency, regularly threatened to exert control over the Panama canal, which is a critical global shipping route. Trump’s administration viewed China’s involvement in the BRI as a means to increase its influence in the region, potentially undermining U.S. interests. The Trump administration’s pressure on Panama likely played a role in the country’s decision to withdraw from the BRI. Panama’s withdrawal from the BRI has several implications: | Aspect | Details | Panama’s withdrawal from the Belt and Road Initiative is a significant development in the geopolitical landscape of the region. The move reflects the complex interplay of international relations and the strategic interests of major global powers. As Panama navigates this shift,it will be crucial to monitor the economic and political implications for both the country and its international partners. for more insights on global news and developments, stay tuned to our coverage. Call to Action: share your thoughts on this development in the comments below and follow us for more updates on international affairs. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), china’s ambitious overseas development program, has been a subject of significant debate and strategic maneuvering in Latin America. Recently, Panama made a notable decision that has drawn considerable attention. The country announced it would not renew a 2017 memorandum of understanding with China to join the BRI. This move comes amid increasing pressure from the United States to curb Beijing’s influence in the region, particularly in sectors deemed strategically important, such as the Panama Canal. – Panama’s decision not to renew its MOU with china on the BRI was announced by President Laurentino Cortizo. This move underscores the growing geopolitical tensions between the United States and China in the region. – The United States has been intensifying its efforts to persuade Latin American countries to distance themselves from the BRI. This pressure is part of a broader strategy to counter China’s growing economic and political influence in the region. – The BRI has the potential to bring significant economic benefits to Latin American countries, including infrastructure development and increased trade opportunities. – There is a growing scrutiny of China’s investments and the terms of its agreements with Latin American countries. This includes a closer examination of the financial and political implications of the BRI. - The BRI’s focus on strategic infrastructure projects, such as ports, roads, and energy facilities, has raised concerns in the United States. These projects are seen as potential security risks and are being closely monitored. – There are worries about the long-term debt that some Latin American countries may incur as a result of their engagement with the BRI. This could lead to dependency on Chinese financial support and influence. – Countries in the region are being encouraged to cooperate more closely to ensure that the BRI benefits are shared equitably and that there is a balanced approach to China’s investments. Panama’s decision to withdraw from the BRI is a significant development in the ongoing geopolitical dynamics between the United States and China in Latin America. As the region continues to navigate the complexities of the BRI, it is indeed crucial for countries to adopt a proactive and pragmatic approach to maximize the benefits while mitigating the risks. The future of the BRI in Latin America will depend on how effectively countries can balance their economic interests with their strategic and political considerations. Table: Key Developments in the Belt and Road initiative in Latin America | Development | Impact | For more insights, refer to the CNN article and the Atlantic Council report. Editor: Hello, and welcome to our interview series. Today, we are discussing Panama’s recent decision to withdraw from China’s belt and Road Initiative (BRI). To shed light on this critically important development, we have with us Dr. Jane Miller,a leading expert on Latin American politics and international relations. thank you for joining us, Dr. Miller. Guest: Thank you for having me. Editor: Could you start by explaining the significance of Panama’s decision to not renew its memorandum of understanding with China regarding the BRI? Guest: Certainly. panama’s decision not to renew its MOU with China is highly significant. It indicates the growing geopolitical tensions between the United States and China in the region. Panama, a key player in Latin America, has essentially aligned itself with US interests by distancing itself from China’s ambitious overseas development program. Editor: How do you think the United States has influenced or pressured other Latin american countries to distance themselves from the BRI? Guest: The United States has been quite proactive in its efforts to limit China’s influence in Latin America,particularly in sectors deemed strategically important. Senator Marco Rubio’s visits to Latin American countries to discuss the implications of the BRI and the need for reassessment are part of this strategy. The US aims to counter china’s growing economic and political influence by persuading countries to rethink their engagement with China. Editor: What are the regional implications of Panama’s withdrawal from the BRI? guest: Panama’s withdrawal from the BRI has several regional implications. It sets a precedent for other countries in the region and indicates the potential for a broader shift in alignments.While the BRI promises significant economic benefits, such as infrastructure development and increased trade opportunities, there are also concerns about long-term debt and political influence. Countries in the region need to adopt a more pragmatic and balanced approach to ensure that the BRI provides concrete benefits without compromising their sovereignty. Editor: How does the BRI’s focus on strategic infrastructure impact the region? Guest: The BRI’s focus on strategic infrastructure, such as ports, roads, and energy facilities, has raised concerns in the United States. These projects are seen as potential security risks and are closely monitored. Latin American countries need to be cautious about the long-term implications of these investments and the potential for dependency on Chinese financial support and influence. Editor: What are the emerging trends related to the BRI in Latin America? Guest: There are several emerging trends. Firstly, there is increased scrutiny of China’s investments and the terms of its agreements with Latin American countries. Secondly, there is a growing focus on strategic infrastructure and the potential risks associated with these projects. Lastly,regional cooperation is being encouraged to ensure that the benefits of the BRI are shared equitably,and that there is a balanced approach to China’s investments. Editor: Thank you, Dr. Miller, for your insights. it provides a valuable perspective on the complex interplay of international relations and strategic interests in the region. How do you see the future of the BRI in Latin America? Guest: The future of the BRI in Latin America will depend on how effectively countries can balance their economic interests with their strategic and political considerations. As the region continues to navigate the complexities of the BRI, it is crucial for countries to adopt a proactive and pragmatic approach to maximize the benefits while mitigating the risks. Editor: That wraps up our discussion today. For more insights on global news and developments, stay tuned to our coverage. Thank you again, Dr. Miller. Guest: Thank you for having me. Call to Action: share your thoughts on this development in the comments below and follow us for more updates on international affairs.panama Withdraws from China’s Belt and Road Initiative
A New Direction for Panama
Key Points of the Withdrawal
|—————————–|——————————————————————————|
| Proclamation Date | February 6, 2025 |
| Reason | Diversification of international partnerships |
| President’s statement | “Diversifying our international partnerships will better serve our national interests and ensure sustainable economic growth.” |
| Implications | Potential shifts in trade routes and international relations |The Belt and Road initiative
US-China Relations and Geopolitics
US Influence
Impact on Trade and Relations
Trade Routes
Conclusion
The Panama canal: A Global Trade Lifeline
Ancient Importance
Modern Expansion
Economic Impact
Environmental Considerations
Futures
Key Points Summary
|———————-|————————————————————————-|
| Historical Significance | Completed in 1914, reduced maritime travel time significantly |
| Modern Expansion | $5.25 billion project completed in 2016 to accommodate larger ships |
| Economic Impact | Generates billions in revenue, supports thousands of jobs |
| Environmental Impact | Water usage and ecosystem concerns, mitigation measures in place |
| Futures | Continuous exploration of efficiency and sustainability enhancements |Kerala’s New Education Policy: A Leap towards Modernization
Key Highlights of the Policy
|————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| skill-Based Learning | Emphasis on practical skills and hands-on experience to complement theoretical knowledge.|
| Digital Integration | Incorporation of digital tools and technologies in classrooms to improve learning outcomes.|
| Teacher Training | continuous professional development for teachers to keep up with the latest educational trends. |
| Inclusive Education | special programs to ensure that children with disabilities have equal access to quality education. |
| Language Policy | Promotion of multilingualism and inclusion of regional languages in the curriculum. |Focus on Skill-Based learning
Digital Integration
Teacher Training
Inclusive Education
Language Policy
Conclusion
Panama Canal: A Pivotal Point in Global Trade and geopolitics
Historical Significance and Modern Challenges
The Trump Factor
The Canal’s Economic Impact
|————————–|——————————–|
| Length | 82 kilometers |
| Daily ship Transits | Approximately 30-40 ships |
| Annual Revenue | Over $2 billion |
| Economic Impact on Panama| Significant contribution to GDP |
| Strategic Importance | Global trade hub |Futures
Conclusion
Panama Withdraws from China’s Belt and Road Initiative
The Belt and Road Initiative
Panama’s Withdrawal
Trump’s Influence
Implications of the Withdrawal
Summary Table
|————————-|————————————————————————-|
| Initiative | Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) |
| Withdrawing Country | Panama |
| Reason for Withdrawal | Pressure from the U.S. and strategic foreign policy shift |
| Implications | Reduced Chinese influence,strengthened U.S. ties, potential economic impact |Conclusion
Belt and Road Initiative: Panama’s Decision and Regional Implications
Key Developments and Trends
– The decision was influenced by the United States’ efforts to limit China’s influence in Latin America, particularly in critical infrastructure and trade sectors.
- Senator Marco Rubio visited Latin America to discuss the implications of the BRI and the need for countries to reassess their engagement with China.
– Though, there are concerns about the long-term debt and political influence that may come with China’s investments. Countries in the region are being urged to take a pragmatic and proactive approach to ensure that the BRI provides concrete benefits without compromising their sovereignty.Emerging Trends in BRI in Latin America
Conclusion
|————————————————–|————————————————————————-|
| Panama’s withdrawal from BRI | Reflects US pressure to limit china’s influence in the region |
| Increased US scrutiny on China’s investments | Aimed at mitigating potential security and financial risks |
| Focus on strategic infrastructure | Raises concerns about long-term debt and political influence |
| Regional cooperation | Encourages equitable sharing of benefits and balanced approach |Interview: Belt and Road initiative – Panama’s Decision and Regional Implications
Related posts:
The protest on July 9, 2020 reside /VIDEO/
- 2024-06-14 21:07:26
Chinese Balloons Capable of Collecting Communication Signals Part of PLA Work, U.S. Officials Say - ...
Hamas Hostage Release: Gaza Ceasefire & Trump's Incoming Presidency
Panhellenic Video games 2024 - Computerized - Hurry final ones - The deadline is over
- 2024-07-18 ...
