Enkeling
Table of Contents
De makers van het programma Koningswens enquêteerden ruim vijftig verloskundigen. Vijftien van hen geven aan weleens te hebben meegemaakt dat het geslacht van een kind reden vormde voor een abortus. De meesten hebben het één keer meegemaakt. Slechts een enkeling zegt het vaker te hebben gezien, zoals Daphne mol. Deze verloskundige, die zelf commerciële echo’s aanbiedt, zegt tegen de programmamakers dat ze in 2024 in zes weken tijd drie à vier cliënten had die vanwege de echo naar een abortuskliniek stapten.
Of er daadwerkelijk meer abortussen plaatsvinden vanwege geslachtselectie is echter nog niet met cijfers bewezen. In Nederland wordt de motivering die mensen aandragen bij een abortusverzoek niet bijgehouden. Bovendien kan iemand bij een arts ook een schijnreden opgeven.
SGP, CU, CDA en BBB vragen de staatssecretaris dan ook of hij wil onderzoeken hoe vaak abortus vanwege geslachtsselectie in Nederland voorkomt.
Geanonimiseerd
Begin 2024 dienden Diederik van Dijk (SGP) en Mirjam Bikker (CU) al een motie in om per jaar de redenen voor een abortus geanonimiseerd en geaggregeerd openbaar te maken. De motie werd destijds alleen gesteund door de fracties van FVD, Denk, SGP en CU.
Investigating Gender-Selective Abortions: An Interview with Dr. Daphne Mol
In a recent investigation by the program “Koningswens,” it was revealed that a critically important number of women in the Netherlands have considered or undergone abortions due to the gender of their unborn child. This issue has sparked debate adn concern among healthcare professionals and policymakers. World-Today-News.com sat down with Dr. Daphne Mol, a specialist in obstetrics and gynecology, to discuss this critical topic.
Initial Findings and Prevalence
Senior Editor: Dr. Mol, can you start by telling us about the initial findings from the “Koningswens” investigation regarding gender-selective abortions?
Dr. Daphne Mol: Sure. The investigation interviewed approximately fifty midwives,and about fifteen of them reported having encountered cases where the gender of the child was a factor in the decision for an abortion.Most of these incidents were one-off cases, but a few, like myself, have seen it more frequently.
Personal Experiences and observations
Senior Editor: You mentioned that you have seen this more frequently enough. can you elaborate on your personal experiences and observations?
Dr. Daphne Mol: Yes, in early 2024, within a span of six weeks, I had three to four clients who decided to have an abortion solely as of the gender of the fetus. This is quite concerning, as it indicates a trend that needs to be addressed.
Lack of official Data
Senior Editor: The article mentions that there is no official data on the prevalence of gender-selective abortions in the Netherlands. Why do you think this is the case?
Dr. Daphne Mol: That’s correct. In the Netherlands, the reasons given for abortion requests are not officially recorded. Additionally, individuals can provide false reasons to healthcare providers, making it arduous to obtain accurate data.
Political Response
Senior Editor: Political parties such as SGP, CU, CDA, and BBB have called for an investigation into this issue. What are your thoughts on their initiative?
Dr. Daphne Mol: I think it’s a positive step. Openness and data collection are crucial for understanding the extent of the problem and developing effective policies to address it. It’s essential to ensure that women have access to accurate information and support, nonetheless of their decision.
Proposed Motions
Senior Editor: Earlier this year, Diederik van Dijk and Mirjam Bikker proposed a motion to make the reasons for abortions public annually. What impact do you think this could have?
Dr. Daphne Mol: This motion could lead to better understanding and awareness. If the reasons for abortions are made public, it could help in identifying patterns and addressing underlying issues. Though, it’s significant to ensure that this information is handled sensitively and respectfully to protect patient confidentiality.
Conclusion
Senior Editor: Dr. Mol, what are the main takeaways you would like our readers to understand from this interview?
Dr. Daphne Mol: Firstly, gender-selective abortions are a real and concerning issue. Secondly, we need more data and transparency to address this problem effectively. Lastly, it’s crucial to provide support and education to women to help them make informed decisions about their pregnancies.
