“I have made an important decision and you informed about it. My government will not renew the 2017 Memorandum of Understanding on the “New Silk Road” initiative. (..) We will study the possibility of completing the project ahead of time, ”Mulino announced after talks with US Secretary of State Marko Rubio.
Rubio and Mulino met on Sunday in Panama.
Rubio called on Panama on Sunday, China‘s influence on the Panama Canal area and warned of the US countermeasures if it did not.
According to Mulino, Rubio did not express a real threat to recover the Panama channel or apply force, but said US President Donald Trump considered China’s presence in the region as a contract infringement, according to which Washington handed over the channel to Panam.
The influence of Beijing on the channel violates the principle of permanent neutrality of the US -built channel resulting from Washington and Panama treaties, the US Secretary of State explained.
Therefore, changes in its use should be made immediately, Rubio emphasized.
Rubio, in a meeting with Mulino, “clearly stated that the current situation is unacceptable, and if the situation does not change immediately, the US will have to act to protect its rights,” said US State Department spokeswoman Tamia Bruce.
Mulino, for his part, described the dialogue with Washington as positive. There is no doubt that the channel is managed by Panama and this status will not change, Panama president explained.
Both countries agreed to set up a bilateral technical group to investigate the situation in ports.
The US Secretary of State and the President of Panama was accompanied by protests.
Dozens of people on the streets of Panama protested against Washington’s claims to the important shipping route.
Table of Contents
The Panama Canal, a vital shipping route connecting the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, has recently been at the center of geopolitical debates.Following a meeting between US Secretary of State Marko Rubio and Panamanian President Mulino, tensions have risen over the canal’s neutrality and management. To unpack the complexities of this issue, World Today News’ Senior Editor sat down with Dr. Elena Martinez, a renowned expert in international relations and Latin American geopolitics.
The Principle of Permanent neutrality: A Past Outlook
Editor: Dr. Martinez, can you explain the principle of permanent neutrality of the Panama Canal and its importance?
Dr. Martinez: Absolutely. The principle of permanent neutrality stems from the Torrijos-Carter Treaties of 1977, which transferred control of the canal from the US to Panama while ensuring its neutrality. This means the canal must remain open to all nations, regardless of political or military affiliations, ensuring it functions as a global transit route. The US played a pivotal role in its construction, so Washington has historically emphasized this neutrality to maintain its strategic interests.
China’s Growing Influence: A Concern for the US
Editor: Secretary Rubio expressed concerns about China’s influence in the region. Why is this a pressing issue for the US?
Dr. Martinez: China’s increasing presence in Latin America, notably through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative,has raised alarms in Washington.The US views China’s involvement as a potential infringement on the canal’s neutrality. Secretary Rubio’s remarks suggest that Beijing’s influence could destabilize the region and undermine the treaties that ensure the canal’s impartiality. This is why the US is calling for immediate changes to address these concerns.
The Bilateral Technical Group: A Step Forward?
Editor: Both countries agreed to establish a bilateral technical group. What role could this play in resolving tensions?
Dr. Martinez: This is a promising growth. The technical group could serve as a platform for both nations to investigate port operations and address issues collaboratively.It demonstrates a willingness to engage diplomatically rather than escalating the situation. However, its effectiveness will depend on mutual trust and transparency, which have been somewhat strained in recent years.
Public Protests and Local Sentiment
Editor: what do the protests in Panama signify, and how might they influence the situation?
Dr. Martinez: The protests reflect Panama’s strong national pride and desire to maintain sovereignty over the canal. Many Panamanians view the US’s concerns as a potential threat to their autonomy. President Mulino’s assurance that the canal is managed by Panama and will remain so is crucial for domestic support. These protests underscore the delicate balance Panama must strike between managing its key asset and navigating international pressures.
Conclusion: A Complex Geopolitical Landscape
Editor: What are the key takeaways from this ongoing situation?
Dr. Martinez: The Panama Canal remains a critical artery of global trade, and its neutrality is essential for international commerce. The recent discussions highlight the complexities of managing this vital waterway amidst shifting geopolitical dynamics. While the establishment of a technical group is a positive step, both the US and panama must work collaboratively to ensure the canal’s neutrality and operational integrity are preserved for the benefit of all nations.