Home » Sport » Keje Korean Insults Spark Tensions: China’s Go Victory Highlights Korea’s Loss

Keje Korean Insults Spark Tensions: China’s Go Victory Highlights Korea’s Loss

Go Controversy Erupts as Keje 9dan Protests Defeat in LG Bae Finals

Teh centuries-old world of Go,a strategic board game revered across‌ Asia,has been ⁢thrust into turmoil following a heated dispute between korean and Chinese players. The controversy centers around Chinese Go player Keje 9dan, who was declared the loser in the 29th LG⁤ Bae Chosun Ilbo Finals held in ⁣Seoul on January 23, 2025, after violating newly introduced “seat management” regulations.

The incident unfolded during the ‌finals hosted by⁣ the Korea Baduk Association, where Keje was⁣ warned by the referee for breaching the ‍rules. ‌Unlike Korean Go, wich calculates territory as⁢ a house, Chinese Go only counts stones on the board, leading to confusion over the regulations. Keje, who refused to accept the foul declaration, did not​ resume ⁢the game, sparking a chain reaction of protests and diplomatic tensions. ‍

The China Baduk Association swiftly issued ⁣a statement rejecting the outcome, and the Chinese ​team boycotted the awards ⁤ceremony the following day. Keje,who was awarded a‍ runner-up prize⁢ of 100 million won,also abstained from attending. In a bold move,the association announced on⁤ January 25 that foreign players‍ would⁤ be barred from ‍participating in the Chinese Go League,further escalating the conflict.​

Keje took to social media to express ​his discontent, modifying his profile from “World Congress 8 Crowns” to “World Congress 9 Crowns” and stating in a live broadcast, “I was insulted in korea,” and “I ‌will never compromise.” His stance garnered widespread ‍support from Chinese netizens, with⁤ many flooding his weibo account with messages of encouragement. Chinese media echoed the sentiment, declaring, “The game‌ that did ⁣not realy win⁢ in the game has won the championship.”

The controversy has ​also impacted international Go events. The⁤ 1st Sawpal Cosanol World’s Best Articles tournament, scheduled for February 6 ⁤in Seoul, ⁣was postponed after the China Baduk Association declared its absence. Four Chinese⁤ players, including Keje, were slated to compete.In response,‌ the Korea Baduk Association announced plans to review the seat management⁤ regulations after the Lunar New Year holidays. Initially introduced in⁤ November 2024 to prevent confusion during international competitions, the rules have now become a focal point of contention. ⁣

|⁣ Key Points ⁢ ​ ⁣ | Details ⁢ ⁤ ‌⁤ ⁢ ​ ‍ ‍ ​ ​ ⁣ |
|————————————|—————————————————————————–|
| Event ‍ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁤ ‌ ⁤ ‍ |​ 29th LG ​Bae Chosun Ilbo Finals ⁢ ⁤ ⁤ ‍ ​ |
| Date ⁤ ⁤| January 23, 2025 ‌ ⁤ ⁣ ‍ ​ ⁢ |
| Location ​ | Seongdong-gu, ⁤Seoul, Korea ⁢ ​ ⁢ ​ ⁣ ‌ ​ ‌ ​ |
| ​ Main‍ Figure ‍ ‍ ⁣⁤ ⁢ ⁤ | Keje 9dan,⁤ Chinese Go player ‍ ‌ ⁣ ⁣ ‍ ⁤ ⁣ ‌ |
| Controversy ⁤ ⁢ | Violation of seat management regulations ⁢​ ⁢ ‌ ‍ ⁣ |
|‍ Outcome ⁣ ⁣ ‌ | Keje declared loser; Chinese team boycotts awards ceremony ‍ ⁢ ​⁤ ‌ ⁢ ‍ |
| ⁣ Impact ⁢ ​ | Postponement ⁤of 1st⁣ Sawpal Cosanol World’s Best Articles tournament |
| Social Media ⁢Reaction | Keje’s Weibo flooded with supportive comments ⁢ ⁤ ‍ ⁢ ‌ |
| Future Action ‌ ⁣ ‌‍ ⁢ | Korea Baduk Association to review regulations post-Lunar New Year holidays |

as tensions simmer, the Go‍ community awaits a resolution that could redefine the rules of engagement ‍in this ancient game. The incident⁣ underscores the cultural and procedural differences between korean and Chinese Go,​ highlighting the challenges of maintaining harmony in international ⁣competitions.

For more ‌details on⁣ the unfolding controversy, visit⁣ the⁣ original source here.

EditorS⁤ Questions with Insights on the Go Controversy

Editor: can you explain the core issue that led to​ the‍ dispute between Korean ⁤and Chinese go players?

Guest: The dispute centers around the newly introduced “seat management” regulations in the⁣ 29th LG Bae Chosun⁣ Ilbo Finals. Keje 9dan,a Chinese Go player,was⁤ declared the loser after violating these rules. The primary confusion arose due to the differences in how ⁤Korean and Chinese Go ‌calculate territory—Korean Go counts territory as a house, while Chinese Go only counts stones on the board. this procedural difference ⁣led to the misunderstanding and subsequent controversy.

Editor: How did Keje and the⁢ Chinese Baduk Association ​react to the decision?

Guest: Keje refused to accept ⁢the foul⁢ declaration and did not resume the game, which escalated the situation. The China Baduk Association swiftly rejected the outcome, ⁣and the Chinese team boycotted the awards ceremony. Keje also abstained from attending, despite being⁣ awarded a runner-up prize of 100 million won.Additionally,the association announced that ​foreign players would be barred from participating in ‌the Chinese Go League,further ‍intensifying the conflict.

editor: What was the public reaction⁤ to this incident?

Guest: Keje ⁢took to social media to express his ‍discontent, changing his profile from “World Congress 8 Crowns” to “World ‌Congress 9 Crowns.” He stated in a live broadcast, “I was ‌insulted in Korea,” and “I will never ⁣compromise,” which garnered widespread support ⁣from Chinese netizens. Many flooded his Weibo account with messages of encouragement. Chinese media also backed his stance, with headlines ⁣declaring, “The game that did not really win in ⁤the game has won the ⁣championship.”

Editor: How has this controversy impacted international Go events?

Guest: The dispute has caused significant disruptions. The​ 1st Sawpal Cosanol World’s Best Articles ‍ tournament, scheduled for February 6 in⁢ Seoul,⁣ was postponed after the China ⁢Baduk association declared its absence. Four Chinese players, ‌including‌ Keje, were slated to compete. In response,‌ the Korea Baduk Association ​announced plans ⁤to review the seat⁢ management regulations after the ⁢lunar New Year holidays.

Editor: What are the broader ⁣implications of this controversy?

Guest: This incident underscores the cultural and procedural differences‍ between Korean and Chinese Go, highlighting the challenges of maintaining harmony ⁤in international competitions. It⁤ has also ⁤brought attention to the need for clearer and more universally accepted regulations to prevent such disputes‌ in the future.

Concluding Thoughts: The Go community is ⁢now⁢ at⁣ a crossroads, awaiting a resolution that‍ could redefine the rules of engagement in⁣ this ancient game. ⁤The controversy between Korea‌ and ⁢China has not only disrupted ⁤major tournaments but also emphasized the importance of understanding and respecting differing traditions and procedures in international⁣ sports.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.