Home » World » Why we communicate more and more and listen to less and less

Why we communicate more and more and listen to less and less

The Art of Listening⁤ in a Noisy World: Why We Communicate⁣ More but Understand less ‌

In an era⁤ defined by constant connectivity, we ‌find ourselves in a paradox: we communicate more⁤ than ever, yet understanding seems to elude ‍us. Social norms dissolve as‌ dialogue rules ​multiply. Social media platforms give⁤ everyone a voice, yet manny⁣ feel unheard. This⁢ contradiction has been the subject of⁢ extensive research and debate, but one critical⁤ aspect has ​been largely overlooked: the art of listening. ‌

Bernhard⁤ Pörksen, a media scientist at the University of ⁤Tübingen, ⁤delves into⁤ this underappreciated facet of communication in his book, “Listening – Art to ‍open Up‌ the World.” Pörksen’s work ‍is not just ⁢an analysis​ but ‍a ⁤call to shift our perspective on how we engage with ​one⁤ another in an increasingly noisy digital age. ‍

The puzzle of‍ “Knowing Ignorance”

At the heart of Pörksen’s ⁤exploration ⁤is the concept of “knowing ‌ignorance.” ⁤He illustrates this ​through⁤ the decades-long sexual⁢ abuse scandal at the German​ Odenwald School,⁢ which persisted as an “open secret”‌ despite‍ media⁢ reports as early as 1999.​ It took a ⁢full decade for ⁤the events to be ⁣truly ⁣acknowledged and ‍addressed. Pörksen examines why⁣ such critical information often goes unheard, ⁣even when it’s ⁣publicly⁣ available.

He introduces the​ idea of the⁤ “deep story,” an emotionally charged framework ⁢that shapes how we listen. “Listening is one of‍ the few free acts that ​a person can perform,” Pörksen quotes Spanish ‌philosopher Francesc Torralba. This‍ deep story acts⁢ as a filter,influencing what we hear and how⁣ we interpret it.

The Attention Economy and the Challenge of Listening​ ⁤

The digital age ⁢has amplified the competition for attention. While⁤ more people than ⁢ever can raise their voices, as seen in the Odenwald School ‍case, ‍the sheer ​volume of information makes‍ it harder⁤ to discern what truly ‍matters. ⁢Social media platforms excel⁢ at ⁣capturing attention but fail to distinguish the essential from the trivial.

Pörksen highlights the phenomenon ⁣of “intellectual immunization,” where individuals reject information that ⁢challenges their worldview.​ A poignant​ example is ⁤the failed project “Papa ‌Pover” (“Papa, ‌Believe Me”), where⁣ Ukrainians attempted to discuss the​ war ⁢with their Russian relatives. Despite their⁤ efforts, Russian propaganda proved stronger than familial bonds. ‌

“Real listening takes time, calm, and concentration,” Pörksen writes. ⁢This is ​not ​just an‍ observation but a reminder of what we lose ⁣in the⁣ cacophony of ⁢modern communication.

A Shift in Perspective

Pörksen’s book is not ⁣a guide but a call ‌to rethink ⁣how we approach communication.⁢ By emphasizing the importance of listening, he challenges us to move beyond⁤ the ‍noise and truly‍ engage with one another.

| Key Insights from “Listening – Art to​ Open Up the World | ⁣
|—————————————————————|
| Paradox of Modern Communication: More communication, less understanding. | ⁢
|⁢ deep Story: Emotional ⁢frameworks shape how ⁣we listen. |
| Attention Economy: Social media​ amplifies noise, making it harder to listen. | ⁤
| Intellectual Immunization:⁤ rejecting information that challenges ⁢our ⁣worldview. ‍| ​

In a⁣ world where ⁤everyone speaks‌ but few truly listen,⁣ Pörksen’s work‌ is a timely reminder of the power⁢ of listening. it’s not just⁢ about hearing‌ words but ⁤opening ourselves to⁣ the world⁢ and the people in it.

“Listening – Art to open Up the World”* is published by Hanser ⁤Verlag and is available for purchase here.

The Art of Listening in a Noisy World: Why We Communicate More but Understand Less

In an era defined ‌by​ constant connectivity, we find ourselves in a paradox: ⁤we communicate more than ever, yet understanding seems to elude us. Social norms dissolve as dialog rules multiply. Social​ media platforms ​give everyone a voice, yet many⁢ feel unheard. This contradiction has been​ the subject of extensive research and debate, but one critical aspect⁣ has been largely overlooked: the art⁣ of listening.​

Bernhard Pörksen, a media scientist at the University of ‍Tübingen, delves into this underappreciated facet ‌of dialogue⁤ in his book, “Listening -​ art to Open Up the World.” Pörksen’s work ⁣is not just an analysis but a call to shift our perspective on how we engage with one another in⁤ an increasingly noisy digital ⁢age.​

the Puzzle of “Knowing​ Ignorance”

Senior Editor: Dr. Pörksen, you introduce⁢ the concept of “knowing ignorance” in your⁤ book. Can you ⁢elaborate on what this means ⁢and why it’s so ⁣critical in ‍understanding⁢ the challenges of listening today?

Dr. Pörksen: Absolutely.”Knowing ignorance” refers to the phenomenon where‌ critical‌ data is available,yet it goes unheard or unacknowledged.I illustrate this thru ⁢the⁢ decades-long sexual abuse scandal at the German Odenwald School, which persisted ‍as an​ “open​ secret”⁤ despite media reports‍ as early as 1999. It took a full decade for the events to be truly acknowledged and⁣ addressed.This concept highlights how ‌societal and emotional frameworks can act as filters, shaping what we‍ hear and how we interpret it. Listening⁤ is not just about hearing words; it’s about being‌ open to the truths they convey.

The ​Attention Economy and the⁢ Challenge ‌of Listening

Senior Editor: ⁤ The digital age has amplified the competition for attention. How ⁢does this impact our ability to listen effectively?

Dr. Pörksen: The digital age ​has given more people than ever the ⁣ability to⁢ raise their voices, but the sheer volume of information makes it harder to discern ⁤what truly‍ matters. Social media platforms excel at capturing attention but frequently enough fail to distinguish ⁣the essential⁣ from the trivial. This environment fosters what I ​call “intellectual immunization,”⁢ where⁤ individuals⁢ reject information that challenges their worldview. A poignant exmaple is the failed project “Papa Pover” (“papa,⁢ Believe Me”), where⁢ Ukrainians attempted​ to discuss the war with their Russian relatives. Despite ‌their efforts, Russian propaganda proved stronger than familial bonds.Real listening takes time, calm, and concentration, qualities that are increasingly scarce‌ in the cacophony of ​modern communication.

A⁤ Shift in Perspective

Senior Editor: Your book is not a‌ guide but a call to rethink how we approach communication. ⁤What are the key insights you hope readers will take ⁣away?

Dr. Pörksen: My work emphasizes the importance of moving beyond the ‌noise and truly engaging⁤ with one another. Here are the key ‍insights I‍ hope readers will consider:

Key Insights
Paradox of Modern ⁣Communication: ⁢More ‌communication, less‍ understanding.
Deep Story: Emotional frameworks⁤ shape⁣ how we listen.
Attention Economy: Social media amplifies noise, making it harder to‌ listen.
Intellectual Immunization: Rejecting information that challenges our worldview.

In ⁤a world⁤ where everyone speaks but few truly listen, it’s ⁤crucial to open ourselves to the world and the people in it. ⁣Listening ​is not just about hearing words but about‌ understanding and connecting‌ on a deeper level.

Conclusion

Senior Editor: Thank you, Dr. Pörksen, for this insightful discussion. Your ⁢work is a timely reminder of the ⁤power of listening in an age where‍ it’s increasingly undervalued. We hope our⁤ readers​ will take your ⁤call to action to heart and strive to listen more deeply and meaningfully in their own lives.

Dr. Pörksen: Thank ‍you. I hope that by shifting our perspective, we can⁣ create more meaningful connections and ⁢foster a greater understanding in our increasingly noisy‍ world.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.