Zelensky Accuses Slovak PM Fitzo of Prioritizing Russian Gas Over Sovereignty
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has sharply criticized Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fitzo for allegedly choosing Moscow over Western partners, accusing him of sacrificing Slovakia’s independence and sovereignty for Russian gas. In a statement published on his official Telegram channel, Zelensky emphasized the importance of energy security and sovereignty, contrasting Fitzo’s approach with that of other European nations.
“For the details of the current Prime Minister of Slovakia. A few days ago, President Trump made a strong decision, which will significantly increase the export of American LNG, in particular to Europe. This is what is needed for security and stability—more energy resources from partners for Europe,” Zelensky stated. He added, “For American LNG, you have to pay money, but for Russian gas, it is necessary to pay not only money but also independence and sovereignty. Many in Europe have already gone thru this and chose the preservation of their independence and sovereignty.”
Zelensky highlighted that while many European countries have shifted away from Russian gas to safeguard their sovereignty, Fitzo has opted for a diffrent path. “But not Mr. Fitzo. He chooses Moscow rather of America and other partners who can provide his country with gas on commercial conditions.This is his mistake. Everyone in Europe needs to be far-sighted and develop relations that strengthen our peoples,” the Ukrainian president asserted.
The tension between the two leaders has been escalating since the beginning of 2025, when Ukraine halted the transit of Russian gas through its territory. Fitzo has responded with sharp rhetoric, even labeling Zelensky as the “enemy” of Slovakia during a parliamentary committee meeting on January 28. This statement followed his earlier criticism of Zelensky’s alleged support for mass anti-government protests in Slovakia, which Fitzo described as a threat to stability.
Key points of the Conflict
| Issue | Zelensky’s Position | Fitzo’s Position |
|——————————–|—————————————————————————————-|————————————————————————————-|
| Energy Sources | Advocates for American LNG and other Western alternatives to ensure sovereignty. | Prioritizes Russian gas, despite concerns over sovereignty and independence. |
| Transit of Russian Gas | Ukraine has stopped the transit of Russian gas since early 2025. | Criticizes Ukraine’s decision, calling it detrimental to Slovakia’s energy needs. |
| Political Relations | Accuses Fitzo of aligning with Moscow over Western partners. | Labels Zelensky as an ”enemy” and criticizes his alleged interference in Slovakia. |
The ongoing dispute underscores the broader geopolitical struggle in Europe over energy dependence and sovereignty. As Zelensky calls for unity and foresight among European nations, Fitzo’s stance has sparked controversy, raising questions about Slovakia’s strategic alliances.For more insights into the escalating tensions, read about how Fitzo’s rhetoric has fueled protests in Slovakia and the potential implications for regional stability.
Illustrative photo: Getty Images
Zelensky vs. Fitzo: A Clash Over energy Sovereignty and geopolitical Alliances
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has accused Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fitzo of prioritizing Russian gas over Slovakia’s sovereignty, sparking a heated geopolitical debate. This conflict highlights broader tensions in Europe over energy dependence, political alliances, and national sovereignty. To delve deeper into this issue, we sat down with Dr. Karolina Novakova, a renowned expert on Eastern European energy politics and geopolitics, to unpack the complexities of this unfolding drama.
The Energy source debate: LNG vs. Russian Gas
Senior Editor: Dr. Novakova, President Zelensky has criticized Prime Minister Fitzo for prioritizing Russian gas over American LNG and other western alternatives. What are your thoughts on this energy source debate?
Dr. Novakova: The debate between Russian gas and American LNG is emblematic of a larger struggle in Europe over energy security and sovereignty. Zelensky’s push for American LNG aligns with a broader European trend of diversifying energy sources to reduce dependence on Russia. Though, Fitzo’s decision to prioritize Russian gas is not just about energy needs; it also reflects Slovakia’s ancient ties to Russia and the economic benefits of cheaper gas.The real issue here is the trade-off between short-term economic gains and long-term geopolitical risks.
The Halting of russian Gas Transit Through ukraine
Senior editor: Ukraine stopped the transit of Russian gas in early 2025, a move Fitzo has criticized as detrimental to Slovakia’s energy needs. How significant is this decision, and what are its implications?
Dr. Novakova: Ukraine’s decision to halt Russian gas transit is a bold move that underscores its commitment to energy sovereignty. For Slovakia, this has created immediate challenges, as it relies heavily on Russian gas for its energy needs. Fitzo’s criticism reflects the urgency of finding choice sources,but it also highlights the broader geopolitical tension between Ukraine and Russia. This situation underscores the need for European nations to invest in infrastructure that supports diversification and energy independence.
Political Relations: Fitzo’s Alleged Alignment with Moscow
Senior Editor: Zelensky has accused Fitzo of aligning with Moscow over Western partners. how does this affect Slovakia’s geopolitical standing and its relations with other European nations?
Dr. Novakova: Fitzo’s stance has undoubtedly strained Slovakia’s relations with Western partners. By seemingly aligning closer to Moscow, he risks isolating Slovakia within the European Union and NATO, both of which are increasingly wary of Russian influence. Zelensky’s accusations highlight the broader concern that such alliances could undermine European unity and weaken the collective response to Russian aggression. This is not just about energy—it’s about the future of European geopolitics.
Fitzo’s Rhetoric and Its Domestic Fallout
Senior Editor: Fitzo has labeled Zelensky as an “enemy” and criticized his alleged interference in Slovakia. How has this rhetoric impacted domestic politics and public opinion in Slovakia?
Dr. Novakova: Fitzo’s rhetoric has polarized slovak society. While some view his stance as a necessary defence of national interests, others see it as a perilous escalation that undermines Slovakia’s democratic values and international reputation. The protests in Slovakia are a clear indication of how divisive this issue has become.Such rhetoric risks alienating Slovakia’s allies and could have long-term consequences for its political stability and international partnerships.
Conclusion: The Broader Implications of the Dispute
Senior editor: What are the key takeaways from this ongoing dispute, and how might it shape the future of European energy and geopolitical strategies?
Dr. Novakova: This dispute underscores the critical importance of energy sovereignty in shaping geopolitical alliances. Europe’s reliance on Russian gas has long been a vulnerability, and the conflict between Zelensky and Fitzo highlights the urgent need for diversification and investment in alternative energy sources. Politically, it raises questions about the alignment of European nations and their commitment to a unified stance against external threats. Ultimately, the resolution of this dispute will have far-reaching implications for European stability and security.
