Trump’s Return to the White House: What It Means for NYC’s Congestion Pricing and Transit Projects
President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has reignited concerns about the future of New York City’s congestion pricing program and other critical transit projects. Despite his campaign promise to “TERMINATE” the tolls during his first week in office, Trump has yet to take action.The tolls, which launched on January 5, are a cornerstone of the MTA’s plan to fund $15 billion worth of repairs and upgrades to the city’s beleaguered mass transit system.
But the question remains: Can Trump actually cancel congestion pricing? Legal experts are divided. While the president may lack the authority to unilaterally end the program through an executive order, Congress could intervene. Some New York Republicans have already floated the idea of killing the tolls through legislative action.
“I think it’s still an open risk that the governance will try to interfere with congestion pricing,” said Nicole Gelinas of the Manhattan Institute. “The state doesn’t have a lot of time to prove to a broad array of New Yorkers — not just peopel within Manhattan,or commuting by bus to Manhattan — that it’s working so well that it should be immune from any political interference.”
The Early Success of Congestion Pricing
Since its launch,congestion pricing has shown promise in reducing gridlock in Manhattan. The program, which requires drivers to pay a $9 fee to enter the busiest parts of the city, has already generated notable revenue for the MTA. Transit officials are counting on these funds to finance critical upgrades,including the Second Avenue subway extension and the Gateway Project,which aims to build a new tunnel beneath the Hudson River.
During Trump’s first term, his administration delayed the federal approvals needed to implement congestion pricing. It also stalled funding for the Gateway Project and the Second Avenue subway extension. These projects eventually received funding under President Joe Biden’s administration, but their future could be at risk if Trump decides to interfere again.
Other NYC Megaprojects in the Crosshairs
Beyond congestion pricing, other major infrastructure projects in New York City could face challenges under Trump’s leadership. One such project is the long-delayed repairs to the triple-cantilever structure of the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway (BQE). Despite temporary fixes and weight restrictions, the aging structure remains a critical concern for the city.
Another potential target is Gov. Kathy Hochul’s proposed Interborough Express (IBX), a light rail line designed to connect Brooklyn and Queens. Major funding for these projects typically requires lengthy negotiations with the Federal Transit Administration, a process that could be elaborate by a Trump administration.
What’s Next for NYC Transit?
While the MTA’s current projects are funded and likely safe from immediate interference, the broader outlook for New York City’s transit system remains uncertain. Advocates argue that the MTA must continue to demonstrate the success of congestion pricing and other initiatives to fend off political challenges.
As Gelinas noted, “The state doesn’t have a lot of time to prove to a broad array of New Yorkers that it’s working so well that it should be immune from any political interference.”
Key Takeaways
| Project | Status | Potential Impact of Trump’s Return |
|——————————|————————————-|—————————————-|
| Congestion Pricing | Launched January 5, 2023 | Risk of political interference |
| Gateway Project | Funded under Biden administration | Likely safe from immediate interference|
| Second avenue Subway Extension| funded under Biden administration | Likely safe from immediate interference|
| BQE Repairs | Delayed; temporary fixes in place | Potential funding delays |
| Interborough Express (IBX) | Proposed; funding negotiations ongoing | Risk of stalled progress |
the stakes are high for New York City’s transit system. As the MTA works to modernize and expand its infrastructure, the political landscape in Washington could play a decisive role in shaping the city’s future.
For more updates on NYC-area transportation, sign up for the On The Way newsletter.
—
This article is based on facts from gothamist. For further details, visit their coverage on congestion pricing, the Gateway Project, and the Interborough Express.The future of New York city’s transit system hangs in the balance as federal funding from President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law is set to expire in 2026.this looming deadline could jeopardize the MTA’s ambitious five-year construction plan, which relies on $14 billion in federal support. Jon Orcutt, director of Bike New york and a former NYC transportation official, warns that projects seeking full funding grant agreements may face significant challenges. “Projects that may seek this kind of agreement in the future could be on the block,” Orcutt said.
The MTA’s previous construction plan, approved in 2019 during Trump’s first term, secured $13 billion through federal formula grants.However, State Comptroller thomas DiNapoli emphasized that any reduction in federal subsidies could be catastrophic. “Any reduction in funding puts the MTA and the city’s economy in harm’s way,” DiNapoli stated. “New york is already struggling to identify funds for the MTA’s next capital program, let alone find replacements for money already in its budget.”
MTA Chair Janno Lieber has remained cautiously optimistic, highlighting Trump’s understanding of new York’s transit needs. “donald Trump is a new Yorker who, in part because he’s an owner of office buildings, gets that traffic is an impediment to the economics of New York city, and with it, the nation,” Lieber said at an MTA board meeting.“There might potentially be MAGA folks around him who look at it differently, but that is one of the reasons that I am optimistic about how this will go forward into the Trump era.”
Trump has reportedly floated the idea of making Penn Station and the city’s subways “beautiful” to Governor kathy Hochul. Meanwhile, political analyst Nicole Gelinas suggested that New York’s recent rightward shift could incentivize Trump to allocate funds to the state, particularly if Republican representatives like Mike Lawler, who is considering a run for governor, champion the cause.“Strangely, we’ve proven ourselves a swing state when it comes to Congress, meaning there is some incentive to throw money our way,” Gelinas said.
Key Points at a glance
| Aspect | Details |
|—————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Federal Funding Deadline | Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funds expire in 2026. |
| MTA’s Construction Plan | Relies on $14 billion in federal support. |
| Previous Funding | $13 billion secured through federal formula grants in 2019. |
| Potential Impact | Reduction in funding could devastate the MTA and NYC’s economy. |
| Political Dynamics | Trump’s focus on NYC infrastructure and potential Republican champions. |
As the MTA navigates these financial and political challenges, the future of New York’s transit system remains uncertain. For more insights or to submit your questions about NYC transit, use this form to connect with experts.
Stay informed and engaged with the latest developments in NYC’s transit system by signing up for the On The Way newsletter.The Rise and Fall of Private Transit: How Political Decisions Shaped Public Ownership
In the early 20th century,private enterprises dominated the transit industry,offering affordable fares and reliable services to millions of commuters. Though, their success was short-lived. Political interventions, particularly bans on fare increases, led to their eventual bankruptcy. this collapse paved the way for the public ownership of transit systems, a model that remains prevalent today.
The Golden Age of Private Transit
Private transit companies once thrived, providing efficient and cost-effective transportation solutions. Their ability to adapt to market demands and innovate made them a cornerstone of urban mobility. However, their reliance on fare revenue made them vulnerable to external pressures.
The Turning Point: Political Intervention
The downfall of these private enterprises began when politicians imposed restrictions on fare increases. “The system became publicly owned after the private enterprises went under,” highlighting the direct impact of these decisions. Unable to adjust their rates to cover operational costs, many companies faced insurmountable financial challenges.
The Shift to Public Ownership
As private companies faltered, cities stepped in to take over transit operations. This transition ensured that essential services remained available to the public, albeit under a new model. Public ownership brought stability but also introduced new challenges, such as funding constraints and bureaucratic inefficiencies.
Key Takeaways
| aspect | Private Transit | Public Transit |
|————————–|—————————–|—————————-|
| Ownership | Private enterprises | Government entities |
| Fare control | Market-driven | Politically regulated |
| Financial Stability | Vulnerable to external bans | reliant on public funding |
| Operational Efficiency| High innovation potential | Bureaucratic challenges |
Lessons for the future
The history of private transit serves as a cautionary tale about the unintended consequences of political intervention. While public ownership has its merits, it also underscores the need for enduring funding models and innovative approaches to urban mobility.
As cities continue to grapple with transit challenges, the lessons from this era remain relevant.By learning from the past, policymakers can create systems that balance efficiency, affordability, and accessibility.
what do you think about the shift from private to public transit? Share your thoughts and join the conversation about the future of urban mobility.
