The Commission on Elections (Comelec) is racing against time to meet the demands of the upcoming may elections, but the specter of new temporary restraining orders (TROs) from the Supreme Court looms large. Comelec Chairman George Erwin Garcia expressed concerns over the potential delays, stating that any new TROs issued after January 22 could derail their already tight schedule.
The issue stems from the Supreme Court’s earlier decision to restore the names of several candidates, including senatorial candidate Subair Mustapha, to the ballot. This move forced the Comelec to halt the printing of approximately 6 million ballots and make significant adjustments to their systems. Garcia emphasized the complexity of the process, saying, “Baka hindi na namin kayanin (We might not be able to handle it).”
To accommodate the court’s order, the Comelec had to overhaul its candidates’ database, election management system, automated counting machines, and consolidation and canvassing system. These changes are part of the “trusted build”, a critical process ensuring the integrity, security, and accuracy of the automated election system. Additionally, the poll body had to generate 1,667 ballot templates to reflect changes in candidate numbering and conduct an inventory of all printed ballots, including those for local absentee voting, overseas voting, and the Bangsamoro Autonomous region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM) parliamentary elections.
The Supreme Court’s intervention didn’t stop there. On January 17, it issued three more TROs, staying the disqualification of three local candidates. This came on top of the five earlier TROs involving Mustapha and four other local candidates. Garcia warned that if new TROs are issued after the printing resumes, the Comelec would have to start the process all over again. “It would be back to zero again for the Comelec if new orders would be issued after we have started the reprinting process,” he said.
The delays have already pushed the Comelec’s timeline off track. The initial plan was to complete the printing of 73 million ballots in 77 days, but the issuance of the first five TROs set them back by at least 14 days.Garcia noted,“We are already delayed at the moment. We are more than two weeks delayed from our 77-day printing schedule.”
to mitigate further disruptions, the Comelec is working to complete the trusted build by January 20 and finalize the generation of ballots faces and serialization of ballots by January 21. Printing is set to resume on January 22, provided no new TROs are issued.Garcia has informed the Supreme Court of the new schedule, hoping for no further interruptions.
Key Points at a Glance
Table of Contents
- Navigating Election Delays: A Deep Dive into Comelec’s Challenges wiht Supreme Court TROs
-
- The Impact of Supreme Court TROs on Election Preparations
- The “Trusted Build” Process and its Importance
- Ballot Printing and the Challenge of Timeliness
- The Role of Judicial Oversight in Election Logistics
- Looking Ahead: Can the Comelec Meet the Deadline?
- Final Thoughts: Lessons for Future Elections
-
| Aspect | Details |
|———————————|—————————————————————————–|
| Ballots Printed | 6 million before Supreme court intervention |
| Total Ballots Needed | 73 million for midterm elections and BARMM parliamentary polls |
| Printing Schedule | 77 days, delayed by 14 days due to TROs |
| Systems Adjusted | Candidates’ database, election management system, automated counting machines, consolidation and canvassing system |
| Ballot Templates Generated | 1,667 |
| New TROs Issued | 3 on January 17, along with 5 earlier TROs |
| Printing Resumption Date | January 22, 2025 |
The comelec’s race against time underscores the delicate balance between judicial oversight and election logistics. As the May elections approach, all eyes are on the Supreme Court to see if it will issue further tros, possibly throwing the Comelec’s preparations into disarray onc again.
The upcoming May elections in the Philippines are already shaping up to be a logistical challenge for the Commission on Elections (Comelec). With the Supreme Court issuing multiple temporary restraining orders (TROs) that have disrupted ballot printing and system adjustments, the Comelec is racing against time to ensure a smooth and timely election process. World-Today-News senior Editor, Maria Santos, sits down with Dr. Luis Manalo, an election systems specialist, to unpack the complexities of this situation and its implications for the integrity of the automated election system.
The Impact of Supreme Court TROs on Election Preparations
Maria Santos (MS): Dr. Manalo, the Supreme Court’s recent TROs have forced the Comelec to halt ballot printing and make important adjustments to their systems. Can you explain how these interventions are affecting the election timeline?
Dr. Luis Manalo (LM): Absolutely, Maria. The Supreme Court’s TROs have been a double-edged sword. while they address legal disputes over candidate qualifications, they’ve caused major disruptions to the election preparations. The Comelec had to stop printing 6 million ballots and rework its entire candidate database, election management system, and automated counting machines. these changes are part of the “trusted build” process, which ensures the integrity and security of the election system. However, each TRO adds days—or even weeks—to an already tight schedule, pushing the Comelec further behind.
The “Trusted Build” Process and its Importance
MS: you mentioned the “trusted build” process. For our readers who may not be familiar, what does this entail, and why is it so critical?
LM: The “trusted build” is essentially the backbone of the automated election system. It involves configuring and validating all software and hardware components to ensure they function securely and accurately. This includes updating the candidates’ database, reconfiguring the automated counting machines, and testing the consolidation and canvassing system. Any changes forced by TROs require a reevaluation of this entire process, which is time-consuming but essential to maintain public trust in the election results.
Ballot Printing and the Challenge of Timeliness
MS: The Comelec initially planned to print 73 million ballots in 77 days, but delays have pushed them back by at least 14 days. How does this impact the overall election preparations?
LM: Printing 73 million ballots is a monumental task, and even a single day’s delay can have ripple effects. The Comelec had to generate 1,667 new ballot templates to reflect changes in candidate numbering, which is a huge undertaking. Additionally, they had to conduct an inventory of all printed ballots, including those for local absentee voting, overseas voting, and the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM) parliamentary elections. These delays mean less time for quality checks and distribution, increasing the risk of errors or logistical issues closer to election day.
The Role of Judicial Oversight in Election Logistics
MS: The Supreme Court’s role in ensuring fair elections is undeniable, but how do we balance this with the Comelec’s logistical needs?
LM: It’s a delicate balance, Maria. Judicial oversight is crucial to uphold the rule of law and ensure that all candidates are treated fairly. However, the timing of these interventions can create significant challenges for election officials. The Comelec’s Chairman, George Erwin Garcia, has rightly pointed out that new TROs issued after January 22 could force them to restart the entire printing process, setting them back to zero. This underscores the need for clearer timelines and dialogue between the judiciary and election bodies to minimize disruptions.
Looking Ahead: Can the Comelec Meet the Deadline?
MS: With printing set to resume on January 22, assuming no new TROs are issued, do you think the comelec can still meet the election deadline?
LM: It’s going to be tight, but it’s not impossible. The Comelec is working diligently to complete the trusted build by January 20 and finalize the generation and serialization of ballots by January 21. If no further TROs are issued, they can resume printing on January 22 and work around the clock to catch up. However, any additional disruptions could jeopardize the entire timeline, so all stakeholders must work together to ensure the elections proceed as planned.
Final Thoughts: Lessons for Future Elections
MS: What lessons can we take from this situation to improve future election processes?
LM: This situation highlights the need for better coordination between the judiciary and election management bodies. Establishing clear deadlines for election-related legal disputes could help prevent last-minute disruptions. Additionally, investing in more flexible and resilient election systems could make it easier to accommodate changes without derailing the entire process. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure that every vote counts while maintaining the integrity and timeliness of the electoral process.
MS: Thank you, Dr. Manalo, for shedding light on these critical issues. We’ll be closely watching how the Comelec navigates these challenges in the coming weeks.
LM: Thank you, Maria. it’s been a pleasure discussing this critically important topic.
—
stay tuned to World-Today-News for more updates on the 2025 Philippine elections and the ongoing efforts to ensure a free, fair, and timely electoral process.
