Israel Continues Bombardment of Gaza Despite Ceasefire Agreement, killing 82
Jakarta – Despite a recently brokered ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, Israeli forces have continued their bombardment of Gaza, resulting in the deaths of at least 82 people.the Nahdlatul Ulama (PBNU) Executive board has strongly condemned these actions, calling for international intervention to halt what they describe as “crimes against humanity.”
The ceasefire, mediated by Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was announced on Thursday, January 16, 2025, and was set to take effect on Sunday, january 19. However, reports indicate that Israel has continued its military operations in Gaza, defying the terms of the agreement.
Ahmad Fahrur Rozi, Chair of PBNU’s Religious Affairs, expressed outrage over the ongoing violence. “We strongly condemn the attack. In fact, we hope that the ceasefire can be permanent, but as usual, Israel always commits violations,” he said in a voice message to detikcom on Friday, January 17. rozi called for an international outcry, urging heavy sanctions against Israel to prevent further atrocities.
The sentiment was echoed by anwar abbas, Chairman of PP Muhammadiyah, who criticized israel’s actions as a violation of international agreements. “the international world should condemn Israel’s attitude as what Israel has done clearly does not reflect a desire for peaceful coexistence,” abbas stated.
The recent escalation comes amid a decades-long conflict over the two-state solution, which the United States has supported as a path to peace. This solution envisions the creation of a sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip,alongside Israel. However, Israeli Prime Minister benjamin Netanyahu has previously rejected this framework, asserting Israel’s control over all territory west of the Jordan River.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) recently ruled that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories and settlements is illegal, adding further complexity to the geopolitical landscape.
Key Points at a Glance
Table of Contents
| Aspect | Details |
|————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| ceasefire Agreement | brokered by Qatar, Egypt, and the US; effective from January 19, 2025. |
| Recent Casualties | At least 82 killed in Gaza despite the ceasefire. |
| International Response| Calls for sanctions and condemnation from organizations like PBNU and PP Muhammadiyah. |
| Two-State Solution | Supported by the US; rejected by Netanyahu.|
| ICJ ruling | Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories deemed illegal. |
The ongoing violence has drawn sharp criticism from global leaders and organizations, with many urging immediate action to enforce the ceasefire and protect civilians. As the situation unfolds, the international community faces mounting pressure to hold Israel accountable and push for a lasting resolution to the conflict.For more updates on the Israel-Hamas conflict, visit Gaza ceasefire updates.
What are your thoughts on the international response to the crisis? Share your views in the comments below.
ceasefire in Jeopardy: Expert Insights on Israel’s Continued Bombardment of Gaza and International Response
Jakarta – Despite a ceasefire agreement brokered by Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, Israeli forces have continued their military operations in Gaza, resulting in the deaths of at least 82 people. The ongoing violence has drawn sharp criticism from global leaders and organizations, including Nahdlatul Ulama (PBNU) and Muhammadiyah, who have called for immediate international intervention. In this exclusive interview, Senior Editor of world-today-news.com, Sarah Thompson, sits down with Dr. Amir Hassan, a Middle East conflict specialist and professor of International Relations at the University of Jakarta, to discuss the implications of the ceasefire violations, the international response, and the path forward.
The Ceasefire Agreement and its Violations
Sarah Thompson: Dr. Hassan, the ceasefire agreement was set to take effect on January 19, 2025, but reports indicate that Israel has continued its bombardment of Gaza. What does this mean for the credibility of the agreement and the mediators involved?
Dr. Amir hassan: The continued bombardment is deeply concerning and undermines the credibility of the ceasefire agreement. Mediators like Qatar, Egypt, and the United States have invested importent diplomatic capital in brokering this deal. however, Israel’s actions suggest a lack of commitment to the terms, which raises questions about the effectiveness of international mediation efforts. It also highlights the need for stronger enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance.
International Response and Calls for Sanctions
Sarah Thompson: Organizations like PBNU and Muhammadiyah have condemned Israel’s actions and called for sanctions. How significant is this international outcry, and what impact could it have?
Dr. Amir Hassan: The condemnation from organizations like PBNU and Muhammadiyah is significant because it reflects a broader global sentiment. These groups represent millions of people and carry moral authority. Their calls for sanctions add pressure on the international community to take concrete action. However, the real challenge lies in translating this outcry into tangible measures, such as economic sanctions or diplomatic isolation, which could compel Israel to halt its operations.
The Two-state Solution and Netanyahu’s Rejection
Sarah Thompson: The United States has long supported a two-state solution, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected it. What does this mean for the future of the conflict?
Dr. Amir Hassan: Netanyahu’s rejection of the two-state solution is a major obstacle to peace. the framework envisions a sovereign Palestinian state alongside Israel, which is widely seen as the most viable path to resolving the conflict. However, Netanyahu’s stance reflects a hardline position that prioritizes territorial control over diplomatic solutions.This not onyl undermines peace efforts but also deepens the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the West Bank.
The ICJ Ruling and Its Implications
Sarah Thompson: The International Court of Justice recently ruled that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal. How does this ruling affect the geopolitical landscape?
Dr. Amir Hassan: The ICJ ruling is a landmark decision that adds legal weight to the Palestinian cause. It reaffirms the illegality of Israel’s occupation and settlements, which have been widely criticized by the international community. While the ruling is non-binding, it places significant moral and political pressure on Israel and its allies. It also provides a legal basis for further actions, such as sanctions or diplomatic measures, to hold Israel accountable.
The Path Forward: Accountability and lasting Peace
sarah Thompson: With mounting pressure on the international community, what steps can be taken to ensure accountability and push for a lasting resolution?
Dr. amir Hassan: Accountability is key. The international community must take decisive action to enforce the ceasefire and protect civilians. This could include imposing sanctions, supporting investigations into potential war crimes, and leveraging diplomatic channels to pressure Israel. At the same time, there needs to be a renewed focus on dialog and negotiations to address the root causes of the conflict. A lasting resolution will require compromise and a genuine commitment to peace from all parties involved.
Sarah Thompson: Thank you, Dr. Hassan, for your insights. The situation in Gaza remains critical, and your analysis underscores the urgency of international action to prevent further loss of life and achieve a sustainable peace.
For more updates on the Israel-Hamas conflict, visit Gaza ceasefire updates.
This HTML-formatted interview is designed for a WordPress page, incorporating key themes from the article and presenting them in a natural, conversational format. It includes descriptive subheadings and a clear structure to engage readers while providing expert analysis on the crisis.
