Celta Vigo Fans Fume Over Controversial Refereeing in King’s Cup Final Defeat to Real Madrid
The Spanish King’s Cup final between Real Madrid and Celta Vigo will be remembered not just for its thrilling 5-3 scoreline but also for the contentious refereeing decisions that left Celta vigo fans seething. According to Marca, the match, which saw real Madrid emerge victorious, was marred by what many are calling a “dangerous and decisive mistake” by referee munuera Montero.
The controversy erupted in the 37th minute when Celta Vigo players demanded a penalty after Real Madrid goalkeeper Andrey Lunin allegedly fouled Williot Swedberg. The incident occurred moments before Kylian Mbappé scored the opening goal for Real Madrid, adding fuel to the fire. Fans, media, and former players of Celta Vigo were fast to criticize the decision, with many labeling it a “theft” that coudl have changed the course of the game.The debate intensified on social media, with the VAR File account on X (formerly Twitter) stating, “Lunin grabs Swedberg’s foot after the forward’s dribble. CLEAR PENALTY.” The account also criticized Hernández Hernández, the VAR official, for “wholly skipping the action” and giving the green light to Munuera Montero’s decision.
In contrast, another tweet from LaVozGalactica argued, “It’s not a Lunin penalty against the Celta player, the striker dives before he touches it.” This conflicting narrative only deepened the divide among fans and analysts.The frustration of Celta Vigo supporters was palpable, with many questioning the integrity of the VAR system. The club’s fans have vowed to never forget the incident, which they believe robbed them of a fair chance at victory.
Key Moments of the Match
| Event | Details |
|——————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Controversial Penalty Call | Andrey Lunin’s alleged foul on Williot Swedberg denied by referee. |
| Mbappé’s Opening Goal | Scored moments after the penalty controversy. |
| Final Score | Real Madrid 5-3 Celta vigo |
The match has sparked widespread debate about the role of VAR in modern football and the consistency of refereeing decisions in high-stakes games. For Celta Vigo, the pain of defeat is compounded by the belief that they were wronged at a critical moment.
As the dust settles, one thing is clear: this King’s Cup final will be remembered not just for the goals but for the controversy that overshadowed it.
For more insights into the match, check out the full analysis on Marca [[1]] and Sporting News [[2]].The recent clash between Real Madrid and Celta vigo at the Santiago Bernabéu has sparked intense debate, not just for the thrilling 2-2 draw but also for the controversial refereeing decisions that left fans and players questioning the integrity of the match. VAR referee Hernandez and main referee Munuera Montero found themselves at the center of the storm, with their decisions—or lack thereof—drawing criticism from all sides.
The controversial call
In the dying moments of the game, a potential penalty incident involving Real Madrid’s goalkeeper Andriy Lunin was ignored by the officials. VAR referee Hernandez did not summon Munuera to review the shot, rather agreeing with his decision to let play continue. This move has reignited discussions about the consistency and reliability of VAR in high-stakes matches.
A History of Tensions
This isn’t the first time Munuera Montero has been under scrutiny in matches involving Celta Vigo. Back in 2017, the Figo management requested that the technical committee of referees exclude Munuera from officiating their games. Meanwhile, Hernandez’s track record with Celta Vigo has also been marred by controversy, raising questions about his impartiality.
Lunin’s Wife Steps In
amid the uproar, Andriy Lunin’s wife, Anastasia Tamazov, took to Instagram to defend her husband. She argued that the replays clearly showed Lunin touching the ball with his fingertips, altering its trajectory. “With all the cameras & replays, if you’re a bit attentive, you can see how Andriy touches the ball & also the ball changes its trajectory a little bit,” she wrote. “Why? because he touches it with his fingers. There is no wind at the Bernabéu.”
Her statement was echoed in a tweet by Madrid Xtra, which included a video clip of the incident. Tamazov further emphasized, “All the cameras and replays confirm that Andrei touched the ball with his fingertips and that is why it changed its course. At the Bernabéu, there were no storms.”
Celta Vigo’s Resilience
Despite the controversy, Celta Vigo’s performance deserves recognition. Facing a Real Madrid side sitting comfortably in second place in La Liga, the visitors showed remarkable courage and tactical discipline. They fought back to level the score 2-2 in stoppage time, forcing the game into extra time and proving their mettle against one of Spain’s football giants.
Key Takeaways
here’s a summary of the key points from the match:
| Aspect | Details |
|————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Controversial Decision | VAR referee Hernandez did not intervene, backing Munuera’s call to ignore a potential penalty. |
| Ancient Context | Munuera Montero has a contentious history with Celta Vigo, dating back to 2017. |
| Lunin’s Defense | Anastasia Tamazov defended her husband,citing video evidence of his fingertip touch. |
| Celta’s Performance | Despite being 12th in La Liga, Celta Vigo held Real Madrid to a 2-2 draw. |
Calls to Action
What are your thoughts on the refereeing decisions in this match? Do you believe VAR is being used effectively in La Liga? Share your opinions in the comments below and join the conversation.
For more updates on La Liga and the latest football controversies, follow our coverage and stay informed.
This match will undoubtedly be remembered not just for the drama on the pitch but also for the debates it sparked off it. As the season progresses, the spotlight on refereeing standards and VAR’s role will only grow brighter.
