Zelensky Accuses Slovak PM fico of Betting on Moscow Amid Gas Transit Dispute
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has sharply criticized Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico for his recent visit to Moscow adn his rejection of Kyiv’s offers to help Slovakia adapt to the end of Russian gas transit through Ukraine. In a series of posts on the social network X, Zelensky accused Fico of prioritizing Moscow over his own country and Europe, calling it a “losing bet from the begining.”
“It was an obvious mistake on Fico’s part to hope that his shady plans with moscow would last indefinitely,” Zelensky wrote. “He bet on moscow, not on his country, not on a united Europe, and not on common sense.”
The dispute stems from Ukraine’s decision to halt the transit of Russian gas through its territory after the existing contract expired at the end of 2024. This move has left Slovakia, which relied on russian gas, scrambling for alternatives. Zelensky revealed that Kyiv had offered assistance to Slovakia to mitigate the impact of the gas cutoff, but Fico “arrogantly refused.”
“Many in Europe warned him that he cannot do nothing and just wait,” Zelensky added, accusing Fico of using “PR, lies, and loud accusations to shift the blame from himself to someone else.”
Fico, however, has not shied away from escalating the rhetoric. Earlier this month, he labeled Zelensky a “beggar and blackmailer,” accusing the Ukrainian president of running around Europe “only begging and blackmailing, begging for money from others.” These comments were widely reported by Ukrainian justice, which described Fico’s statements as offensive.
The Slovak leader has also threatened to veto further aid to Ukraine in the european Union if the gas transit issue is not resolved. “If Zelensky ‘does not give us our gas,’ a serious conflict may arise,” Fico stated, as reported by News Pravda.
Zelensky, meanwhile, remains optimistic about europe’s energy future. He emphasized the importance of diversifying energy supplies, collaborating with the European Commission, and leveraging the incoming US management’s policies to increase American gas exports to Europe. These measures,he believes,will help overcome “problems that arise as an inevitable result of the short-sightedness of individual European personalities.”
The Ukrainian president also hinted at a potential resolution to the gas transit issue, stating that Kyiv would consider extending the contract only if Russia received payment for exported gas after the war ends.
Key Points at a Glance
Table of Contents
- Ukraine-Slovakia Gas Transit Dispute: Expert Insights on energy Security and Geopolitical Tensions
-
- The End of Russian Gas Transit: What It Means for slovakia
- Zelensky’s Accusations: A Bet on Moscow or a Strategic Misstep?
- The Role of the EU and U.S. in Resolving the crisis
- Fico’s Rhetoric: Escalation or Political Posturing?
- A Path Forward: Can Diplomacy Prevail?
- Final Thoughts: What’s at Stake for Europe?
-
| Issue | Zelensky’s Position | Fico’s Position |
|——————————-|—————————————————————————————-|————————————————————————————|
| Gas Transit | Ukraine halted Russian gas transit; offered Slovakia alternatives | Rejected Kyiv’s offers; threatened to veto EU aid to Ukraine |
| Accusations | Fico bet on Moscow, not Europe; used PR to shift blame | Zelensky is a “beggar and blackmailer” |
| Future Solutions | Diversification of energy sources; cooperation with EU and US | Demands Ukraine resume gas transit; threatens conflict if demands are not met |
The escalating tensions between Kyiv and Bratislava highlight the broader challenges Europe faces in navigating energy security amid geopolitical conflicts. As the situation unfolds, the international community will be watching closely to see whether diplomacy or further confrontation prevails.
For more updates on this developing story, follow Zelensky’s official X account and stay tuned to Kyiv Independent for in-depth coverage.
Ukraine-Slovakia Gas Transit Dispute: Expert Insights on energy Security and Geopolitical Tensions
The ongoing dispute between Ukraine and Slovakia over the halt of Russian gas transit has escalated into a war of words between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico. with Ukraine ending its gas transit agreement with Russia at the close of 2024, Slovakia, heavily reliant on Russian gas, has been left scrambling for alternatives. Zelensky has accused Fico of prioritizing Moscow over European unity, while Fico has retaliated with harsh rhetoric, labeling Zelensky a “beggar and blackmailer.” To shed light on the complexities of this issue, we spoke with Dr. Elena Kovalenko, a leading energy security expert and professor of International Relations at the European University Institute.
The End of Russian Gas Transit: What It Means for slovakia
Senior Editor: Dr. Kovalenko, Ukraine’s decision to halt russian gas transit has left Slovakia in a arduous position.How notable is this move for Slovakia’s energy security?
dr. Kovalenko: Slovakia’s reliance on Russian gas has been a longstanding issue,with nearly 90% of its gas imports historically coming from Russia. The halt of transit through Ukraine is a major blow, as it disrupts a critical supply route. Slovakia now faces the urgent task of diversifying its energy sources. While Zelensky has offered assistance, Fico’s rejection of these offers reflects a deeper political rift.Slovakia’s energy security is at a crossroads, and its ability to adapt will depend on how quickly it can secure alternative supplies, such as liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the U.S. or increased imports from Western Europe.
Zelensky’s Accusations: A Bet on Moscow or a Strategic Misstep?
Senior Editor: President Zelensky has accused Fico of “betting on Moscow” rather than aligning with Europe. Do you think this criticism is justified?
Dr. Kovalenko: Zelensky’s criticism is rooted in Fico’s recent visit to Moscow and his apparent reluctance to engage with Ukraine’s proposed solutions. From a geopolitical outlook, Fico’s approach seems shortsighted.By rejecting Kyiv’s offers and escalating tensions,he risks isolating Slovakia within the EU. However, it’s also crucial to consider the domestic pressures Fico faces. Slovakia has a significant pro-Russian sentiment in certain regions, and Fico’s rhetoric may be aimed at appeasing these constituencies. Having mentioned that, aligning too closely with Moscow at a time when Europe is striving for energy independence is a risky strategy.
The Role of the EU and U.S. in Resolving the crisis
Senior Editor: Zelensky has emphasized the importance of diversifying energy supplies and collaborating with the EU and U.S. How feasible are these solutions in the short term?
Dr. Kovalenko: Diversification is absolutely critical, but it’s not an overnight solution. The EU has been working on reducing its dependence on Russian energy since the invasion of ukraine in 2022, and significant progress has been made. The U.S. has also ramped up LNG exports to Europe, which could help fill the gap. Though, infrastructure limitations, such as the capacity of LNG terminals and pipelines, remain a challenge. In the short term, Slovakia may need to rely on interim measures, such as increased gas storage or temporary agreements with neighboring countries.
Fico’s Rhetoric: Escalation or Political Posturing?
Senior Editor: Fico has called Zelensky a “beggar and blackmailer” and threatened to veto EU aid to Ukraine. Is this rhetoric likely to escalate the conflict further?
Dr. Kovalenko: Fico’s language is undoubtedly inflammatory and risks deepening the divide between Slovakia and Ukraine. However, it’s worth noting that such rhetoric often serves domestic political purposes. By positioning himself as a defender of Slovak interests, Fico may be trying to rally support at home. That said, his threats to veto EU aid to Ukraine are concerning. Such a move would not only strain Slovakia’s relationships within the EU but also undermine European unity at a critical time.
A Path Forward: Can Diplomacy Prevail?
Senior Editor: Zelensky has hinted at a potential resolution, suggesting that Ukraine might consider extending the gas transit contract if Russia pays for exported gas after the war ends. Is this a realistic proposal?
Dr.Kovalenko: It’s an engaging proposal, but its feasibility depends on several factors. First, it assumes that the conflict in Ukraine will eventually reach a resolution, which is far from certain. Second,it requires Russia to agree to post-war payments,which Moscow may be reluctant to do. any such agreement would need to be negotiated within the broader context of EU energy policy and international sanctions. While the proposal highlights Zelensky’s willingness to seek solutions, it’s unlikely to provide immediate relief for Slovakia.
Final Thoughts: What’s at Stake for Europe?
Senior Editor: As this dispute unfolds, what are the broader implications for Europe’s energy security and geopolitical stability?
Dr. Kovalenko: This dispute underscores the challenges Europe faces in achieving energy independence while navigating complex geopolitical dynamics. The rift between Ukraine and Slovakia highlights the need for greater solidarity and coordination within the EU. If left unresolved, this conflict could weaken Europe’s collective response to Russian aggression and hinder efforts to build a more resilient energy infrastructure. Ultimately, the international community will be watching closely to see whether diplomacy or further confrontation prevails.
For more updates on this developing story, follow Zelensky’s official X account and stay tuned to Kyiv Self-reliant for in-depth coverage.
Dr. Elena Kovalenko is a professor of International Relations at the European University institute and a leading expert on energy security and European geopolitics. Her research focuses on the intersection of energy policy, international relations, and conflict resolution.
