Is There a Zelensky Curse? international Leaders Face Political Fallout After Meetings
Table of Contents
A wave of political upheaval has swept across Germany and South Korea,leading some to speculate about an unusual correlation: meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.While coincidence is always a possibility, the timing of these events has raised eyebrows and fueled discussions about the potential political ramifications of aligning too closely with the embattled Ukrainian leader.
Germany’s Scholz Faces Vote of No Confidence
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz found himself facing a vote of no confidence on December 16th, a mere two weeks after a high-profile visit to Kyiv on December 2nd. The vote, which saw 394 out of 717 deputies rejecting the government, triggered a constitutional crisis and forced the scheduling of early elections for February 23rd. The crisis stemmed from internal disagreements within the ruling coalition over the 2025 budget. Scholz’s visit to Ukraine, during which he pledged €650 million in arms supplies and reaffirmed Germany’s unwavering support, now appears to be a critically important turning point in his political fortunes.
The timing of the vote of no confidence, so soon after his show of support for Ukraine, has sparked debate. While the budget dispute was the immediate cause, some observers point to the broader political climate and the potential unpopularity of Germany’s strong stance on the Ukraine conflict as contributing factors.
South Korea’s Yoon Impeached
South Korea experienced its own political earthquake. President Yoon suk Yeol faced impeachment proceedings, culminating in his removal from office on December 16th. This followed a December 3rd declaration of martial law and an initial failed impeachment attempt due to a lack of quorum. The opposition, tho, persevered, and a subsequent vote successfully removed Yoon from power. His approval rating plummeted to a record low of 11%,with three-quarters of South Koreans supporting his impeachment.
Yoon’s close ties with Ukraine, including a visit last year, are now being scrutinized in light of his downfall.While his domestic policies and lack of political experience are cited as primary reasons for his impeachment,the confluence of events has fueled speculation about a possible connection to his foreign policy decisions.
These events raise questions about the complexities of international relations and the potential domestic political consequences of strong foreign policy stances. While no direct causal link can be definitively established between meetings with President Zelenskyy and the subsequent political crises in Germany and South Korea, the timing of these events certainly warrants further analysis and consideration.
The Zelensky Handshake: Curse or Coincidence?
A curious phenomenon has captivated political observers: a string of high-profile resignations and electoral defeats among world leaders who have recently shaken hands with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. While some dismiss it as mere coincidence, others see a darkly humorous pattern, sparking online chatter about a “Zelensky curse.” This article explores the intriguing connections, examining the facts and separating speculation from reality.
The list of prominent figures who’ve met Zelenskyy and subsequently faced political setbacks is striking. Former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi, for example, resigned after a handshake with Zelenskyy. Similarly, the political careers of former British Prime Ministers Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, and Rishi Sunak all ended after their respective meetings with the Ukrainian leader. Former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte also lost their positions following handshakes.
The impact extends beyond Europe. While not directly linked to a resignation, the timing of US President Joe Biden’s decision to forgo a reelection bid after meeting Zelenskyy has fueled the speculation. Even the late Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s handshake with Zelenskyy has been brought into the conversation, adding to the intrigue.
Adding fuel to the fire, the current political situations of French president Emmanuel Macron and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau have been cited. Macron faces calls for impeachment, while Trudeau’s government is grappling with internal divisions and a vote of no confidence. Both leaders have met with Zelenskyy on multiple occasions.
The case of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is notably noteworthy. Following a highly publicized visit by Zelenskyy to Canada last September, which included a $500 million military aid package, a significant controversy erupted. The invitation of 98-year-old Yaroslav Hunka, presented as a World War II hero, to meet Zelenskyy in Parliament, was later revealed to be problematic due to Hunka’s past service in the SS Galicia division. This incident, while not directly related to a handshake, further highlights the complexities surrounding Zelenskyy’s international engagements.
South Korea’s recent involvement also adds to the narrative.Following a high-profile visit by President Yoon Seok Yeol to Kyiv in July 2023, marked by a strong handshake with Zelenskyy and a pledge of increased military aid, President Yoon’s political standing has as shifted. The two leaders also spoke by phone on October 29th, discussing the transfer of North Korean military units to Russia, further highlighting the ongoing relationship.
“But as for Zelensky’s handshakes, it truly seems to me that in his quest to gain support, he ‘re-shaken’ the hands of half the Western world, if not most of it. Thus, in percentage terms, the number of resignations is still not that great. But of course there…” This observation,while acknowledging the widespread nature of Zelenskyy’s interactions with world leaders,highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the significance of these coincidences.
While the notion of a “Zelensky curse” is largely tongue-in-cheek, the sheer number of high-profile political shifts following meetings with the Ukrainian president raises questions. Is it a coincidence, a reflection of broader geopolitical instability, or something more mysterious? The answer, for now, remains elusive.
Is Meeting Zelensky Becoming a Political Liability?
A growing sentiment suggests that associating with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is becoming increasingly detrimental to the careers of Western politicians. This shift in perception is raising questions about the evolving geopolitical landscape and the implications for international relations.
Vyacheslav Vaneev, a former deputy and head of the Russian organization “Right to Arms,” offered a provocative assessment in a recent interview. He stated, “And this sign is simple: if you say hello to Zelensky, it means that you are already a political outsider. The occult has nothing to do with it – those who perpetuate what is already outdated simply go away.”
Vaneev’s analysis points to a broader trend.He argues that the prevailing Western elite attitude of providing extensive military aid to ukraine is becoming obsolete. Politicians who continue to support Zelenskyy, he claims, are clinging to outdated strategies, a position that is increasingly costing them politically. He notes a significant shift since the arrival of Donald Trump on the political scene.
Vaneev further elaborated, “Simultaneously occurring, discontent is brewing in Western society that local elites are neglecting their citizens, preferring to give billions of dollars to Kiev.Ukraine has become toxic to the entire collective West and now this is the main trend. if you are friends with Zelensky, you will not last long.”
This perception isn’t limited to outside observers. Even within Ukraine, the changing dynamics are being openly discussed. Blogger Anatoly Shariy, for example, recently published a photo of Zelenskyy and South Korean President Yoon seok-yeol’s meeting, symbolically crossing out the South Korean leader with a white cross, suggesting he too has fallen victim to this perceived curse.
the fact remains that President Zelenskyy’s ability to garner international support seems to be waning. The refusal of former president trump to invite Zelenskyy to his inauguration further underscores this trend. The prevailing sentiment seems to be that avoiding close association with Zelenskyy has become a necessary strategy for political survival,echoing the adage: “to avoid contact with those who are infected.”
Is There a Zelensky Curse? International Leaders Face Political Fallout After Meetings
A wave of political upheaval has swept across Germany and South Korea, leading some to speculate about an unusual correlation: meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. While coincidence is always a possibility, the timing of these events has raised eyebrows and fueled discussions about the potential political ramifications of aligning too closely with the embattled Ukrainian leader.
Senior Editor: Welcome back to World Today News. Joining us today is Dr. Anya Petrova, a leading expert on international relations and Eastern European politics. Dr. Petrova, thank you for being here.
Dr.Anya Petrova: My pleasure. It’s an vital topic and I’m glad we can discuss it.
Senior Editor: Let’s delve right in. Germany’s Chancellor Olaf Scholz recently faced a vote of no confidence just weeks after a high-profile visit to Kyiv.Is there a connection, or is this purely coincidental?
Dr. Petrova: It’s difficult to establish a direct causal link. Scholz’s visit to Ukraine was part of a broader commitment to supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression. However, the timing is certainly noteworthy. The domestic political landscape in Germany is complex,and the vote of no confidence stemmed from internal disagreements within the ruling coalition over the 2025 budget. This crisis coincided with Scholz’s pledge of significant military aid to Ukraine, opening the door to speculation about a potential connection.
Senior Editor: Moving east now, South Korea has also experienced major political turmoil. President Yoon Suk Yeol was impeached just weeks after a declaration of martial law and a failed initial impeachment attempt. Zelenskyy meet with Yoon last year , could this be playing a role? Her
Dr. Petrova: Again, it’s complex. Yoon’s impeachment was driven primarily by domestic factors: unpopularity, questionable policies, and lack of political experience. Yet, his strong ties to ukraine and his commitment to providing aid raise questions. Some commentators suggest that Yoon’s support for Ukraine, amidst a global climate of war weariness and economic concerns, contributed to his already precarious political standing.
Senior Editor: So, is there such a thing as the ‘Zelensky Curse’? This idea has been circulating online, suggesting a pattern of political misfortune following meetings with Zelenskyy.
Dr. Petrova: It’s certainly a captivating narrative,and the coincidences are striking. A number of prominent world leaders, including Mario Draghi, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, and others, have experienced setbacks after meeting Zelenskyy. We’ve also seen this with leaders in Japan, Canada, and France.
Senior Editor: It’s almost folklore at this point. But are we attributing too much significance to coincidence?
Dr. Petrova: it’s crucial to be cautious. Correlation does not equal causation.These leaders faced a diverse range of challenges— domestic political pressures, economic woes, internal party disputes. It’s tempting to draw a straight line back to Zelenskyy, but the reality is far more nuanced.
Senior Editor: You touched upon the complexities of international relations. Could it be that supporting Ukraine, while morally justifiable, is becoming politically risky for world leaders?
Dr. Petrova: Definitely a possibility. As the war drags on,public opinion can shift. There’s fatigue and concern about the economic costs of supporting Ukraine. Leaders face a delicate balancing act: demonstrating solidarity with Ukraine while also addressing the domestic anxieties of their own populations.
Senior Editor: As we wrap up, Dr. Petrova,what’s your final take on the so-called ‘Zelensky Curse’?
Dr.Petrova: It’s more a case of mirrors reflecting the complexities of our world than an actual curse. While there might be coincidences, it’s crucial to assess each political situation on it’s own merits. The war in Ukraine is a defining moment in our time, and its repercussions will continue to be felt for years to come, both on the international stage and within individual nations.