Home » News » Social Services Federation Chairman Critiques Protest Culture Shift

Social Services Federation Chairman Critiques Protest Culture Shift

Hong Kong social Worker Advocates for Collaboration Over Confrontation

Guan Haoming, newly elected⁢ chairman of the Hong Kong Social services Federation, ‌is calling for a significant shift in how social ⁢workers engage with the government. Known⁢ for his past involvement ⁢in social ​movements, Haoming now champions a collaborative approach, prioritizing dialog and partnership​ over protest.

Social Services Federation Chairman Critiques Protest Culture Shiftsocial workers do not need to take an oath. ‍(Photo by Lin Junyuan)”>
Guan Haoming, the new chairman‍ of‍ the ‍Federation of Social Services, aims to foster⁣ a more collaborative relationship between social workers and the government.

Haoming’s ‌election this month‍ marks a turning point, replacing Chan Chi-si, who held the position for 22 years.‌ In a recent interview, Haoming acknowledged ‌the past emphasis on ⁤protest as a means of advocacy. He stated, “Either demonstrating, making noise, or ‍scolding, evil enough​ that the government is afraid of you and fight for it, as this method was taught‌ in the past.”

A New Era of Collaboration?

Haoming’s ​vision centers on fostering a more constructive relationship between social workers and ‍the government.He ⁢believes that open ⁣communication and collaborative problem-solving are⁤ essential for effective advocacy.‌ He aims to “make social workers understand⁤ how to work with the government,where resources always come from.”

He ⁤attributes the previous reliance on protest⁢ to a lack of complete training, stating that⁤ past training⁢ focused solely on the needs of those in distress, neglecting the financial realities and operational ⁢challenges faced ⁢by the government.He emphasizes the need ‍for greater transparency regarding ‌government funding and operations. ​ he explains, ⁣”The shouting is over, everyone has to go ⁣back ‌to (review), some things need to ⁣be ⁤read longer.”

Understanding​ the financial Landscape

Haoming also criticized a lack ‌of understanding within the social welfare sector regarding government spending.while acknowledging the considerable social welfare budget (over⁢ $100 billion), he points out that a significant portion is allocated to social⁤ security and ‌direct services, leaving a smaller amount for other initiatives. He stated, “(The social⁢ welfare sector) is accustomed to getting (money) against it, not as a business… In fact, you ⁤(social⁤ welfare‌ organizations) are⁣ also ‌a business, (should think about) how to do it better, it really helps.”

haoming’s call for a more collaborative approach resonates with similar discussions in the⁢ United States, where non-profit⁢ organizations and government agencies are increasingly exploring partnerships to address complex ⁢social issues.​ His emphasis on understanding the financial constraints‍ of government funding mirrors the challenges​ faced by social service providers across the globe.

“/>Social Services Federation Chairman Critiques Protest Culture Shift

guan Haoming believes that there is no need to tighten national security ⁤requirements in the social welfare sector, and social‍ workers do not need ⁢to take‌ an oath. (Photo by Lin Junyuan)

Detailed ‌agencies have high administrative costs and should be consolidated

In terms of industry structure, ​Guan believes that there are not ⁤many restrictions⁤ on the establishment of ⁤non-governmental institutions in Hong Kong, resulting in a large number and too⁤ specialized charities. Because the administrative costs ⁣are relatively ​fixed,the average administrative costs of small institutions are higher It will be better,because ​the management does not have to so much”,but the government or the Social Union cannot force the integration of ⁣institutions,“there ⁢is no force,but the admin (administrative) account is counted”.

Guan Haoming said that⁢ some groups​ have specialized services, such as only for autism and dementia, can provide better services, but ‍from a⁣ cost-effectiveness viewpoint,‍ they should​ not be removed It’s too small and can ​create the illusion of insufficient resources. “Maybe ‍the government is doing a good job in social welfare as a whole, but it’s not doing enough ⁢for you. That’s noisy. Should it actually ​be like this?”

Social workers know red​ lines and do not⁢ need to take oaths

Regarding the differences between the proposal ⁣and ​the social welfare sector,Guan admitted that ‌the social welfare sector used communication thinking less in the past. As for whether the social welfare sector‌ is sufficient in maintaining national⁢ security, Guan Ho-ming said that⁣ the social welfare sector’s purpose is to help the disadvantaged. The social welfare sector’s national security requirements are “OK for now” and do not need ‍to ‌be tightened, nor do they believe ⁤that ⁣social workers need to take‌ an oath.

The original article ⁤was published on AM730 Hong Kong Social Services Leader Sounds Alarm, Citing Industry’s “Astray” Path

guan Haoming, the newly appointed chairman of the Hong Kong‌ Council of Social Service (HKCSS), has issued a stark warning about the direction of the social services sector. His comments come amidst⁤ a backdrop of recent protests in Hebei province,China,highlighting the complexities of social⁢ reform and government-citizen relations.

Haoming’s critique centers on what he‍ perceives as ⁢a deviation from the core principles of social service provision. He suggests ‌the industry⁤ has lost its way, failing to adequately ⁣address the evolving needs of the⁤ community. ​ while​ he didn’t‍ specify the exact nature of ‍these shortcomings,​ his concerns ‌resonate with broader discussions about the effectiveness and accessibility of social services, both in Hong Kong and internationally.

the timing of Haoming’s‍ statement is significant. Recent protests in Hebei, sparked by discontent over land seizures and perceived government overreach, underscore the potential consequences of neglecting societal needs and failing to foster open communication ⁣between authorities‌ and ⁢citizens. These events serve as a⁤ cautionary tale, illustrating the⁣ potential for social unrest⁤ when grievances are ⁢left unaddressed.

“The industry has gone astray,”

Haoming’s statement, though brief, carries⁣ considerable‍ weight. His position at the helm of the HKCSS, a prominent association in Hong Kong’s social services landscape,​ lends ​his words significant authority. The statement serves as a call to action, urging a critical reassessment of current practices and a renewed commitment to serving the‌ community effectively.

The parallels​ between the situation in Hebei and potential challenges facing Hong Kong’s social services sector are undeniable. Both highlight the‍ importance ​of responsive governance, transparent communication, and a⁤ proactive approach to addressing societal ​concerns ‌before they escalate into widespread unrest. ⁢ Haoming’s comments encourage a deeper examination of these issues and ​a commitment to preventing similar⁤ situations from unfolding in Hong kong.

This⁢ situation underscores the importance of‌ robust and responsive social safety nets in both Hong Kong and the United States. The need ⁤for effective communication between ⁤government and citizens, and the crucial role of social service organizations​ in bridging that gap, are worldwide concerns.

Understanding the Broader Context

While specific details regarding the nature of Haoming’s concerns remain undisclosed, his statement‍ prompts reflection on the challenges faced‌ by⁢ social service organizations globally. These challenges often include funding⁤ limitations,bureaucratic hurdles,and the ever-evolving needs of diverse⁤ communities. ‍ Addressing these issues ​requires collaborative efforts⁢ between government agencies, non-profit organizations, and community members.


This is a interesting article about ‍Guan Haoming,the new chairman of the ⁣Federation of Social Services in Hong Kong.‍ He’s advocating for a⁤ notable shift in the relationship between social workers and the goverment, moving away from a ‍confrontational “protest culture” towards‍ more collaboration and ⁤understanding.



Here are some key takeaways:



From Protest to Partnership: Haoming believes past reliance ⁣on protests ​and criticism wasn’t effective and stemmed from a lack of comprehensive training for social workers. He wants to equip them to ⁣understand government funding constraints and work ​collaboratively to⁢ find solutions.

Financial Openness: Haoming emphasizes greater transparency ‍regarding government spending on social ​welfare.He acknowledges the large budget‍ but points out that not all funds are equally accessible for ​various⁢ social initiatives.

Industry Consolidation: He suggests consolidating smaller NGOs to improve cost-effectiveness, arguing that ‍their high administrative costs detract from service ⁢delivery.

National Security Concerns: Haoming‌ contends that⁣ the social welfare sector doesn’t pose a national security threat and doesn’t need stricter regulations or oaths for‌ social workers.



his vision highlights‌ an important debate: how can social service organizations effectively advocate for the‌ needs of vulnerable populations while‌ maintaining a constructive relationship with ⁣the government?



possible Discussion Points:



Is Haoming’s approach realistic considering the history of tensions between social ​NGOs and the government?

What are⁤ the potential benefits⁣ and drawbacks of his proposed shift towards⁢ collaboration?

⁤ How can greater financial transparency be achieved?

What are the ethical considerations surrounding the consolidation of smaller NGOs?





This article‍ provides valuable insights into‌ the challenges and opportunities facing the social welfare sector in Hong Kong. It raises critically important questions about the balance ‍between advocacy and collaboration and the best‍ ways to ensure the well-being of the city’s most⁢ vulnerable citizens.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.