Home » Technology » Baldur’s Gate 3: Chinese Gamer Review Bombing After The Game Awards

Baldur’s Gate 3: Chinese Gamer Review Bombing After The Game Awards

Review Bombing Controversy Rocks Gaming World

The popular video game, Larian Studios forums”>Baldur’s Gate 3, recently found itself at the ⁣center of a significant ⁣online controversy.Following an appearance by Larian⁤ Studios’ CEO Swen Vincke at The Game Awards, the game became the target of a review-bombing campaign,⁢ primarily driven by gamers in China.

The incident stemmed from Vincke’s comments, which criticized corporate greed within the gaming ‍industry and advocated for prioritizing creative development ​and⁢ developer well-being over pure⁢ sales figures. these​ remarks, according to reports, were misinterpreted by some⁣ Chinese gamers. The miscommunication ⁤fueled anger among a segment of the fanbase.

Adding ⁤fuel to the fire, the Game of the Year award at⁢ The Game Awards went ‍to Astro Bot Rescue Mission, a game not available on Steam. This outcome further fueled⁣ frustration among some gamers who felt that another title, Black Myth: Wukong, was more deserving. This disappointment, coupled with the perceived ⁣slight⁤ from Vincke’s comments, ​appears ‍to have led to a redirection of negative sentiment towards Baldur’s Gate 3 ‍on the Steam platform.

Image related to Baldur's Gate 3 <a href=review bombing controversy”>

While the review bombing campaign resulted in a surge of over 500 negative reviews on Steam within a single day, it ultimately had little impact on the game’s overall overwhelmingly positive ‌reception.Supportive fans quickly countered the negative reviews,highlighting the game’s high‍ quality and ⁤positive player ⁣experience.

This incident underscores the crucial role ‍of⁢ clear communication and accurate translation in the global gaming‌ community. The controversy raises important questions about ⁢the nature of online⁣ reviews, the⁤ effectiveness of review‍ bombing as a form of protest, and the duty of platforms like steam in managing such situations. the debate continues: Should platforms implement stricter measures to mitigate the impact of review bombing, or should the‍ system remain largely self-regulating?


The review bombing campaign targeting Baldur’s Gate 3 immediately followed an appearance by ⁢Larian Studios’ CEO swen Vincke at The Game Awards and was ⁣primarily driven by gamers in China. [3]



During his speech, Vincke criticized corporate greed ⁣throughout ⁢the gaming industry, promoting rather a focus ⁣on creative development⁤ and ⁢developer well-being over pure sales numbers. [2] His remarks⁤ appeared to be misinterpreted by some Chinese​ gamers, igniting anger among a segment of the fanbase. [3]



Adding fuel to the fire, ​the Game of the Year award at The Game Awards ‌went to Astro Bot ‌Rescue Mission—a game not available ​on Steam. This outcome fueled frustration among‌ some gamers who ⁢believed another title, Black Myth:​ Wukong, was more deserving. This disappointment,​ coupled with perceived insults from Vincke’s remarks, seemed‍ to redirect negative⁣ sentiment towards Baldur’s‍ Gate 3 on Steam. [3]



The‌ review-bombing onslaught resulted in an influx of⁣ over 500 negative reviews on Steam in a single day. Though, its effect on the game’s ⁣overall‍ reception proved negligible. Supportive fans countered⁤ the hopeful negativity, highlighting the game’s high quality and positive player experiences.[2]

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.