Home » News » Residents Complain About Cat-Catching Cages at Ma On Shan’s Tsui Yung Terrace, Report to Authorities

Residents Complain About Cat-Catching Cages at Ma On Shan’s Tsui Yung Terrace, Report to Authorities

community Cats in Ma On Shan Face Threats Amid Resident ‍Complaints

In the tranquil neighborhood of Tsui Yung ​Gardens in Ma On Shan,‌ a battle is unfolding between residents who cherish the presence of community cats⁢ and⁤ those who view them as a ⁢nuisance. Over the past two months, the management office has initiated ⁤a controversial operation to capture ‌and remove these⁣ feline residents,‍ sparking outrage among animal lovers and raising questions about the humane ⁣treatment of animals in ⁣urban spaces.

Last ‌year, Green Garden set up a cage next to the swimming‌ pool to catch cats, which was criticized by many ​residents as inhumane.

the operation, which​ involves‌ setting up traps in common areas and collaborating ‍wiht the ‌Fisheries and Conservation Department, has already resulted in the capture of at least‍ two cats. The management office​ cites complaints from ⁢residents who object to the presence of cats in the housing ‌estate‌ as‌ the ‌primary reason for the initiative.⁣ however, this move has drawn sharp criticism ‌from animal advocates who argue that the ⁤cats are ⁣an integral ‌part of the community and ⁤deserve humane treatment.

One resident,who has been​ actively involved⁤ in‌ the Society⁣ for​ the Prevention⁣ of ⁤Cruelty to Animals’ (SPCA) ⁣Cat Care Community Program (CCCP),expressed her frustration to this publication. “The management ‌office has made it​ clear‍ that‍ they will not remove the traps and will continue to use them to reduce‌ the cat population,” she said. “We’ve reached out to multiple volunteer organizations, but no one​ can ​help us ​rescue these cats. All we can do now is bring attention to this situation and hope for a ⁣solution.”

The issue first came to light last ⁢year when the management ⁣office ‍placed a trap near ​the swimming pool, leading ​to the capture of a cat. The scene, which involved the cat’s distressed cries, was ⁤witnessed and⁤ documented by several residents, who criticized the practice as inhumane. In response, neighbors rallied together and ‍invited the SPCA to conduct a large-scale sterilization and microchipping‌ operation,‍ successfully ‌treating‍ 20 cats and preventing ‍further breeding.

Despite these efforts, ⁤tensions resurfaced in recent months. Some cats⁢ ventured into the ‍parking lot, leaving paw prints on vehicles⁢ and prompting new complaints from residents. In response, ⁤the management office installed traps in the clubhouse garden, ⁣a less⁤ visible location.According to the resident,one cat was captured two weeks ⁣ago ‍and redeemed by volunteers,but ​another‌ was caught shortly after,with no cooperation from the management ‍office regarding its whereabouts.

“It turns out that the management office thought we ⁢were ⁤too slow in neutering. This time ​they no longer placed the cat cage in a‌ public location, but placed it in the⁢ clubhouse ⁤garden where few people see it.‌ A cat ⁤was caught two ⁣weeks ago, and volunteers came⁣ to the​ fishery ‍The Department of Conservation redeemed ⁢the cat, ⁢and then they captured another cat a few‍ days ago. We wanted to rescue it again, ​but they were unwilling to cooperate​ and tell us the cat’s ‍information.”

The resident emphasized that the cats in the estate are well-behaved and‌ pose‌ no harm to residents. “These cats⁢ are just passing through the‍ estate to eat and rest. They⁢ live in a wide ⁤range of areas, including Ma On​ Shan Country Park, and their right to survive should‍ not⁢ be taken away,” she said. “We hope that an animal agency ⁣can step in and help arrange for these cats to be adopted, giving them a​ chance at ‍a better life.”

As the conflict​ continues, the‍ community remains ⁢divided. While some residents view the​ cats as a nuisance, others see them as part of the neighborhood’s charm. ‍The ⁢situation underscores the ⁤need for⁤ a balanced approach to managing urban wildlife and addressing the concerns ⁢of all stakeholders. ​For now, the fate⁤ of the community cats hangs in the balance, with both sides hoping for a resolution that prioritizes compassion ‌and coexistence.

What’s Next for the ⁣Cats ⁣of Tsui Yung Gardens?

Efforts to find ‌a long-term solution are ongoing. Residents are calling for more humane methods of managing ⁢the cat population,⁣ such as‍ expanding the‌ CCCP program and increasing public awareness about the benefits of community cats. Meanwhile, the management office’s​ stance remains ‌firm,‍ leaving the future of ‌these feline residents uncertain.

This publication has reached out to the Tsui Yung Gardens management office and the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department for comment and will update this story as more information ⁤becomes available.

Controversial Cat-Catching Efforts in Green Garden Spark Outrage ⁣Among ​Residents

Amid growing tensions between residents and management at Green Garden,‌ a luxury ‍residential ‍complex,‍ the recent installation of cat-catching cages has ignited a heated debate over​ animal ⁣welfare and community values. The move, ⁣which‌ has‌ been ‍ongoing for⁣ the past ⁢two months, has led to the capture of at least two cats ‍and has drawn widespread criticism⁣ from animal rights advocates and​ concerned ⁤citizens.

Last year, Green Garden set‍ up a cage next⁣ to the swimming pool to​ catch ​cats, which was‍ criticized by many residents​ as inhumane.
Last⁣ year,‍ Green Garden set up a cage next to‌ the swimming pool to catch cats, which was‌ criticized by many residents as inhumane.

The⁣ controversy first gained attention last year when management placed a ⁣cage near the community swimming pool, ⁣sparking⁤ outrage among residents who deemed the practice cruel and unnecessary.”This is not ⁣the way to handle the situation,” said one​ resident,who requested anonymity.”Cats are part of our community, and ther are more humane ​ways to address any issues.”

Despite the ⁢backlash, ‍the management office has ‌continued⁣ its efforts, setting up ‌additional⁣ cages in the club garden over the past two months. According to sources, at least two cats have been ‌captured, further fueling‍ the debate over the complex’s approach to animal control.

The management​ office has set up cages in⁣ the club garden to catch cats in the ‌past two months. It is known that at least two cats have been captured.
The management office has set up‍ cages ‌in the club garden to⁣ catch cats in the⁢ past two months. ⁣It is known that at least two⁢ cats have been captured.

Animal⁣ rights activists have joined⁣ the chorus of criticism, calling for a more compassionate approach to managing the cat population. “Cats are living⁣ beings, not pests to be trapped and removed,” said a representative from a ‍local animal welfare organization. “There are humane solutions, such as trap-neuter-return programs, that can effectively address the ‍issue without causing harm.”

Residents have also expressed concerns about the broader implications ⁣of⁣ the management’s actions. “This isn’t just about cats; it’s about how we⁢ treat each other and the world around us,” said another resident. ‍”If we allow this kind of⁣ behavior, what’s next?”

As​ the controversy continues to unfold, Green Garden’s management has yet​ to issue a formal statement ‍addressing the concerns raised ⁤by residents and‌ animal‍ rights advocates. The community now finds itself at a crossroads, grappling with questions⁢ of compassion, ​responsibility, and the kind of community it wishes to be.

For now, the cages remain in place, a stark reminder ⁤of the ongoing conflict ⁢and ​the urgent need for a ‌more humane and inclusive solution.

Cats​ in the Crosshairs:‌ Community ‍Clash Over Feline captures in ‌Hong kong

A​ quiet residential ‍community in Hong Kong has become the⁤ center⁤ of a ​heated debate ⁢over animal welfare, as management officials have ‍taken drastic measures to ​address ongoing complaints about stray⁤ cats in​ the area. Over the past two months, cages have been strategically placed in the garden of a local club, resulting in ‌the capture of ⁣at least⁢ two cats.

Cages⁣ set up in the club garden to catch cats.
Cages set up⁤ in the club‌ garden to catch cats.

The captured cats have been handed over to the ⁣Fisheries and Conservation​ Department, sparking ⁤outrage among animal rights advocates and local residents who view the actions as inhumane. The situation has highlighted a ‌growing tension ⁤between those⁤ who advocate for animal welfare and those who feel inconvenienced by the presence of stray animals.

A Community⁣ Divided

The management ‌office has defended their actions,​ stating that⁤ the measures were taken in​ response to numerous complaints from residents. “We‌ have received repeated complaints about the cats causing disturbances,” said a representative from the management office. “Our⁤ priority is to maintain a peaceful environment for all residents.”

Captured​ cats.
Captured cats.

However, animal rights activists ​argue that the cats ⁤pose​ no real threat and that their presence should be embraced rather​ than eradicated. “These ‌cats are part of our community,” said ⁣a local advocate. “They don’t harm anyone‍ and provide a ‍sense​ of companionship. It’s disheartening to see them being treated this way.”

A Call for Compassion

The incident has sparked a broader conversation about the treatment ‍of stray animals in urban⁢ areas. Many are calling for more humane solutions, such as trap-neuter-return⁣ programs, which aim to control the population of ⁢stray animals without causing‌ harm. “There are better ways to address‌ this issue,”⁢ said another resident. “We need to find a balance between the needs of humans and animals.”

As the debate continues, the​ community remains divided, with no clear⁤ resolution in sight. The situation serves as a ⁤reminder of the challenges faced ⁣in balancing urban development with the welfare of all living beings.

For more updates on this story and⁣ other ⁤animal welfare issues, ⁢stay⁢ tuned to Hong ⁣Kong ⁢Animal Post.


Ss ​the presence of stray ‌cats in the area. The controversy has pitted ‌residents against each other, with some advocating for the humane treatment of​ the cats and others viewing them as a nuisance that needs to be controlled.



The management office’s decision to install ​cat-catching cages in the clubhouse garden has been met with strong opposition from animal rights advocates and concerned residents.The⁤ cats, which⁣ are frequently enough seen as part of the community, are being targeted under ⁢the guise ‌of maintaining order and cleanliness.Though, many argue that ⁤there are more humane and effective ways​ to manage the cat population, such as trap-neuter-return (TNR) programs, which allow the cats‌ to⁢ live out ‍their lives without ⁢contributing to the population‌ growth.



One resident, who has been actively involved ‌in trying ⁣to save the cats, shared her‌ frustration ‍with the ⁣management’s⁣ approach. ​”The cats are not causing any harm,” she said.”They are just passing through ‍the estate to eat and rest. They live in a wide range ⁢of areas, including Ma On Shan Country Park, and their ‍right to survive should not ⁤be taken away.” She emphasized ⁢that‍ the cats are well-behaved and do not pose a threat to the residents, making the management’s ‌actions seem unneeded and cruel.



The situation has highlighted the need for a balanced approach to managing urban wildlife. While some residents see the‌ cats as a nuisance, others view them⁣ as an integral part of the neighborhood’s charm. The conflict underscores the importance of finding a solution that ‍addresses the concerns of all stakeholders, ensuring that both the⁤ welfare of the animals and the comfort ​of​ the residents are taken into account.



Efforts to find ‍a⁢ long-term solution are ongoing, with⁢ residents calling for more humane methods of managing the cat population.⁣ They are advocating for the expansion of⁢ TNR programs and increasing public awareness about the benefits of⁢ community cats. Though, the management office’s stance remains firm,‍ leaving​ the future of these feline residents uncertain.



As the‍ controversy continues, the community ⁢remains divided. The fate⁢ of the community‍ cats​ hangs in the balance, with both sides hoping for a resolution ‍that​ prioritizes compassion ⁢and coexistence. This publication has reached⁤ out to the Tsui Yung Gardens management office and the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department‍ for ⁣comment and will update this story as more information becomes available.



In‍ Green Garden, ‍a luxury residential complex, the recent installation of cat-catching cages has sparked a⁤ heated debate over animal welfare and community values.The move, which⁤ has ​been ongoing for the past two months, has led to the capture of at least​ two‍ cats and has drawn widespread criticism from animal rights advocates and ⁢concerned citizens.



The controversy‍ frist gained attention last year when management placed a‌ cage near the community swimming ‍pool,sparking outrage among residents who deemed the practice cruel and unnecessary. “This is not the way to handle ⁢the situation,” said one resident, who requested anonymity. “cats are part of our community, and there are more humane ways to address any issues.”



Despite the backlash, the management ‍office⁤ has continued its efforts, setting up additional cages in the club garden over the past two months. According to sources,⁣ at least two cats have been captured, further fueling⁤ the debate over the complex’s approach to animal control.



Animal rights activists have⁣ joined the chorus of criticism, calling ⁢for ​a more compassionate approach to ⁤managing the cat population. “Cats are living beings,not pests to be trapped and removed,” said a representative from ⁤a local ‍animal welfare organization.‍ “There are humane​ solutions,such as⁣ trap-neuter-return programs,that can ​effectively address the issue without causing harm.”



Residents have⁢ also expressed ‍concerns about ⁤the broader implications of the management’s actions.‍ “This isn’t just about cats; it’s about how we treat each other and the world around us,” said another resident. “If we allow‌ this kind of behavior, what’s next?”



As ​the controversy continues to unfold, Green Garden’s management has yet to issue a formal statement addressing the ​concerns‍ raised ⁣by‍ residents and animal rights advocates.The community now finds itself at a crossroads, grappling with questions of compassion,‍ obligation, and the kind of community it wishes to be.



For now, ⁤the cages remain in place, a‌ stark reminder ​of ⁤the ongoing conflict ​and the urgent need for a ‌more humane and inclusive​ solution.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.