Loggers vs. Wildlife: Conservation Groups Sue Over Sapphire Mountains Project
A contentious logging and road-building project in Montana’s Bitterroot National Forest, known as the Gold Butterfly Project, is facing renewed legal fire from conservation groups who argue environmental reviews haven’t properly considered crucial new information about grizzly bears and wolverines in the area.
The Alliance for the Wild Rockies and the Native Ecosystems Council initially sued the U.S. Forest Service in September, alleging the project violated federal environmental regulations. Now, they’ve amended their complaint, claiming the Forest Service ignored alarming updates about grizzly and wolverine activity disclosed after their initial review.
"The 2023 monitoring efforts detected five wolverines in the Bitterroot National Forest — four males and one female,” the lawsuit states. “Four of the wolverines (three males and one female) were detected at the Sapphire Mountains monitoring station.”
These wolverines, now protected under the Endangered Species Act, were spotted within the project area—a fact the lawsuit argues necessitates a completely new environmental impact assessment.
Adding fuel to the fire, recent reports also document "recurring, verified" grizzly bear sightings in the Sapphire Mountains, a clear indication that these apex predators could be directly impacted by the project.
"Federal agencies must prepare a supplemental NEPA document when there are ‘significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns bearing on the proposed action or its impacts,’” the amended complaint asserts.
The lawsuit claims the Forest Service acknowledged these developments but has chosen to proceed with the project as planned, stating it would have "no effect" on grizzly bears despite the mounting evidence to the contrary.
The Gold Butterfly Project, which authorizes commercial logging on over 5,000 acres, also includes burning on another 2000 acres, and the construction of 17.3 miles of new roads to facilitate the transport of 7,000 truckloads of wood. With an estimated cost of $4.2 million to taxpayers, the project has drawn criticism for its potential impact on wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities, especially the pursuit of elk hunting.
"It is estimated to cost taxpayers $4.2 million," the groups say in their initial complaint, which also accuses the Forest Service of exaggerating the amount of old-growth forest that would remain after completion.
The dispute highlights the ongoing tension between economic interests and conservation efforts, prompting another round in a battle that will likely have lasting ramifications for both wildlife and the Montana landscape.
The U.S Forest Service has declined to comment on the ongoing litigation.
<span data-href="mailto:?body=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20East%20Idaho%20News:%0D%0A%0D%0ALoggers%20vs.%20Wildlife:%20Conservation%20Groups%20Sue%20Over%20Sapphire%20Mountains%20Project&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews" class="fa-stack jDialog">
## Loggers vs. Wildlife: Conservationists Sound Alarm on Sapphire Mountains Project
**World Today News Exclusive Interview with Dr. Emily Carter, Carnivore Conservation Specialist**
**World Today News: ** Dr. Carter, thank you for joining us today. the Gold Butterfly Project in Montana’s bitterroot National Forest has sparked controversy.conservation groups are suing the U.S. Forest Service, claiming the project threatens endangered species. Can you shed some light on this issue?
**Dr. Carter:** Certainly. The Gold butterfly Project proposes extensive logging and road construction in the Bitterroot National Forest. While proponents argue for economic benefits,conservationists,including my association,are deeply concerned about the potential impact on threatened species like grizzly bears and wolverines.
**WTN:** Specifically, what are the concerns raised by the updated lawsuit?
**Dr. Carter:** Initially, the lawsuit alleged the Forest Service didn’t adequately consider the environmental impact during its review process. Now, new information about wolverine presence within the project area has emerged, raising the stakes even higher. Wolverines are a federally listed endangered species, and their detection near the logging zone necessitates a reevaluation.
**WTN:** How notable is this wolverine discovery, considering their endangered status?
**Dr. Carter:** It’s incredibly significant. Wolverines are solitary and elusive creatures, making their detection a rare and valuable occurrence. Finding five individuals, including a female, in the Sapphire Mountains indicates a potential breeding population, crucial for species recovery. We need to ensure their habitat remains undisturbed.
**WTN:** The Forest Service maintains that their initial environmental review was thorough. How do you respond to that?
**Dr.Carter:** We believe the discovery of wolverines within the project area fundamentally changes the equation. The Forest Service must now consider this crucial new information and conduct a complete supplemental review. Ignoring this data would be irresponsible and possibly illegal.
**WTN:** What are your estimations regarding the potential impact of the project on wolverine populations?
**Dr. Carter:** The project’s potential impact on wolverines is multifaceted. Road construction fragments habitat, increases vehicle strikes, and opens access for hunters and trappers. Logging itself can disrupt denning sites and food sources, making survival more challenging.
**WTN:** What is the ultimate goal of your organization and the lawsuit?
**Dr.Carter:** Our goal is to ensure the protection of endangered species like wolverines. We are not against responsible forestry practices, but we believe this project’s scope and location pose an unacceptable risk. We hope the court will mandate a thorough re-evaluation and ultimately protect these critical habitats.
**WTN:** Dr. Carter, thank you for your insights on this significant issue.
**Dr. Carter:** You’re welcome. It’s essential to raise awareness about the delicate balance between development and conservation efforts. We need to ensure that decisions affecting wildlife are made with the most up-to-date information and prioritize species survival.
