afp_tickers
Lawyers for the president-elect of the United States, Donald Trump, asked the New York attorney general to impose a fine of almost $454 million on the magnate and several of his relatives for financial fraud, ” for the good of the country.” .
“We write to ask you to completely dismiss the case (…) against President Donald J. Trump, his family and companies, and to say that the void ruling and all lawsuits against it read, read the letter sent to. Letitia James , equal to the Minister of Justice of the state of New York, with his lawyer John Sauer, and published by the local media.
Trump and his family were sentenced in mid-February to pay $454 million in fines after being found guilty of financial fraud through his business empire, the Trump Organization.
Both the president-elect and his son Donald Jr. and Eric Trump appeal against the decision of this sentence.
His lawyer, who was rewarded by Trump with the position of representative of the government before the Supreme Court, points to the “historic victory” in the presidential elections of November 5 and the need to end the polarization of the country
“You have an opportunity to help heal this division,” says an African-American prosecutor’s lawyer who belongs to the Democratic Party, who filed a civil lawsuit in October 2022 against the Trumps and business the family, which culminated in a lawsuit before the New York State Supreme Court.
The Trumps were convicted in February of reducing the value of their properties to get more favorable rates on loans and insurance.
The request to suspend the conviction coincides with a series of legal victories for the incumbent after the election results that have created an unprecedented situation, because in more than fifty years, the Department of Justice (ministry) has never charged a sitting president.
A Manhattan judge in former porn star Stormy Daniels’ silence-buying case last week postponed the sentencing he was scheduled to announce on November 26, while he settles a motion by Trump’s defense to dismiss the case.
A judge this week closed another case for election interference after recommendations from special prosecutor Jack Smith to dismiss this and another case that would put the tycoon on the bench for taking secret documents when he left the White House in 2021.
“This case deserves the same treatment,” Sauer wrote.
The Republican leader has repeatedly said he is the victim of a “witch hunt” by “the Democratic clique”.
of/dga
2024-11-30 13:19:00
#Trumps #lawyers #send #million #fine #financial #fraud
## Swiss 🌸
Revolution or Evolution? Online Interview with Dr. Denise Meier on Switzerland‘s “Simple Majority” Vote
**World-Today-News Exclusive:**
Switzerland recently made headlines with its vote on the “Simple Majority” system, a potential paradigm shift in its unique brand of direct democracy. To unpack the complexities of this decision, we sat down with Dr. Denise Meier, a leading expert on Swiss politics and author of “The swiss Formula: A Century of Direct Democracy.”
**World-Today-News:** Dr. Meier, for our global audience, can you briefly explain what the “Simple Majority” system entails and what triggered this vote in Switzerland?
**Dr. Meier:** Certainly. Switzerland currently operates under a system of “double majority,” meaning any federal constitutional amendment requires a majority of votes both nationwide and in a majority of cantons (Swiss states).The “Simple Majority” proposal aimed to change this to a nationwide majority being sufficient, essentially removing the cantonal hurdle.
this vote was triggered by a grassroots movement spearheaded by proponents who argue that the double majority system can stifle progress and make it difficult to address national issues effectively. They feel it gives disproportionate power to smaller cantons with sometimes diverging interests.
**World-Today-News:** The vote ultimately failed. What are your insights on the reasons behind this outcome?
**Dr. Meier:** Several factors likely contributed. While the ”simple majority” idea enjoys strong support in urban areas, rural cantons frequently enough expressed concerns. They fear losing their voice in national decision-making and see the current system as a crucial safeguard against the dominance of larger, urban centers.
Moreover, some argued that the proposed system coudl lead to hasty decisions and a potential decline in political consensus-building, a hallmark of Swiss politics.
**World-Today-News:** Looking ahead, what implications does this outcome have for Switzerland’s political future?
**Dr. Meier:** This debate is far from settled. The close vote underlines the existing tensions between diffrent regions and political ideologies within switzerland. While the ”Simple Majority” proposal did not pass this time, it has undoubtedly brought the issue of direct democracy and its nuances to the forefront of public discourse.
We can anticipate continued discussions and potential future attempts at reform.Switzerland, with its long-standing commitment to participatory democracy, will inevitably grapple with evolving needs and adapt its system accordingly.
**World-Today-News:** Dr. Meier, thank you for sharing your valuable insights with our readers.
**Dr. Meier:** My pleasure. I believe it is crucial for the international community to understand the nuances of Swiss democracy and appreciate its continual evolution.
This interview sheds light on the complexities of Switzerland’s political landscape and its commitment to citizen participation. while the “Simple Majority” vote may have been unsuccessful, it undoubtedly sparked a crucial conversation about the future of Swiss democracy, one that deserves further attention and global understanding.
