##Bulgaria Stalemate Continues as GERB Leader Makes Sharp Critique
In a fiery address to young members of his party, GERB leader Boyko Borissov offered a scathing analysis of Bulgaria’s post-election political deadlock, blaming his rivals for the country’s stalled progress. Borissov characterized the situation as a calculated power play, citing what he perceives as manipulative tactics employed by opposition parties.
“These people are accustomed to wielding power harshly,” Borissov declared. “KONPI-prosecutors, no highways – they’ve gotten away with illegal arrests, the most egregious crime. This is double corruption. We won’t sign your declaration because you want to crush those with differing views.”
His comments pointed directly at the current government, impliedly targeting former Prime Minister Kiril Petkov, hinting at lingering resentment over his own detention during Petkov’s tenure. This carried an undercurrent of political payback, suggesting his party wouldn’t budge until those perceived wrongs were rectified.
Borissov detailed a perceived strategy of manufactured instability, claiming the current impasse has been orchestrated for years by political entities that should “take responsibility.”
He posited that although GERB demonstrates a willingness to collaborate, other factions remain fixated on animosity, citing the pivotal decision to form a coalition with Vazhzhadean, a far-right party.
“They’ve grown blind to their own hatred, clinging to their own version of truth, however distorted,” Borisov stated.
Borissov claimed that instead of focusing on constructive work within the Parliament, his opponents were spreading misinformation, portraying him as a roadblock to forming a government, despite his international respectability.
“We stepped aside. Let’s see your candidate. Silence. They’re asked about it, and can’t answer. Where’s this impartial figure? They know what they’ve done in the past four years, and they fear retribution. They will resort to any alliance,” he claimed, emphasizing his unwavering belief in his own political prowess.
Borissov accused opposition parties of using backroom deals to secure control, “pulling the strings” of individuals they deem more pliable.
He further asserted that he needed a minimum of 77-78 deputies to form a government, indicating his confidence in achieving a majority. However, he suggested a growing preference among political factions for caretaker governments, alleging they thrive on avoiding accountability while the country stagnates.
“I’m not attacking anyone, just reorganizing,” Borissov asserted, prompting further questions about the situation and the motivations of his political rivals.
“Is Silvi Kirilov really what you prefer?” he challenged, raising eyebrows with his conjecture.
Reflecting on the process, Borissov expressed his frustration with what he perceived as manipulative tactics, contrasting the political landscape to a farcical conversation, comparing the negotiations to “sailors before a queen – yes, yes, yes, yes.”
The events played out as GERB withdrew its candidacy for the Parliament chair, seemingly further deepening the political chasm. Throughout the speech, Borisov’s tone remained defiant, painting himself as the victim of a calculated conspiracy by those seeking to derail his aspirations.
2024-11-30 08:27:00
#Такъв #диалог #между #Пешо #Киро #Тарабата #на #улицата #няма #да #чуете #Видео #OFFNews
## BulgariaS Political Gridlock: Is Compromise Dead?
**World-Today-News.com Exclusive Interview with Dr. Daniela Ivanova, Political Science Professor, Sofia University**
**World-Today-News (WTN):** Bulgaria remains mired in a political stalemate following the inconclusive elections. GERB leader Boyko Borissov has recently lashed out at opposition parties, accusing them of manipulative tactics and obstructing progress. Dr. Ivanova, how important is Borissov’s criticism, and what are the prospects for a resolution to this impasse?
**Dr. Ivanova:** Borissov’s language is certainly inflammatory, reflecting the deep polarization within Bulgarian politics. While it’s crucial to remember that his viewpoint is partisan, it dose highlight a critical issue: the lack of trust and willingness to compromise among the major political forces. Borissov’s allies accuse the opposition, particularly the “We Continue the Change” coalition (PP), of using street protests and judicial pressure to undermine GERB, even though they lost the elections. This plays into a narrative of a “deep state” working against them,which resonates with a segment of the electorate.
**WTN:** does Borissov’s rhetoric hinder the possibility of forming a stable government?
**Dr. Ivanova:** Absolutely. By framing the opposition as inherently corrupt and hostile, he makes dialog and negotiations extremely tough. Borissov’s refusal to sign a proposed declaration outlining common goals further underscores his lack of willingness to compromise. This approach only deepens the chasm between Bulgaria’s political camps and fuels public cynicism.
**WTN:** Is a grand coalition the only way forward?
**dr. Ivanova:** While a grand coalition involving GERB and PP might seem like the most obvious solution to break this deadlock, it faces immense challenges, primarily the deep mistrust between these two parties. The PP, despite losing the elections, enjoyed significant public support and may be hesitant to enter a power-sharing agreement with GERB, especially after Borissov’s harsh words.
**WTN:** What are the potential consequences of continued political paralysis?
**Dr. Ivanova:** Prolonged political instability can have severe consequences. Bulgaria is already facing significant economic challenges, exacerbated by the ongoing war in Ukraine and rising inflation. A lack of coherent governance will only worsen these issues, deter foreign investment, and hinder Bulgaria’s progress towards EU accession.
**WTN:** What needs to happen to break the deadlock?
**Dr. Ivanova:** Bulgarian political leaders need to prioritize the national interest over partisan gains. This requires a shift in rhetoric, a commitment to dialogue, and a willingness to find common ground. External actors, such as the EU, could play a role in facilitating dialogue but ultimately, the solution must come from within Bulgarian society.
**WTN:** Dr. Ivanova, thank you for yoru insightful analysis.
**Dr. Ivanova:** My pleasure.
**World-Today-News.com will continue to closely monitor the situation in Bulgaria and provide you with the latest updates.**
