BOLOGNA – “We firmly condemn violence, regardless of its origin. However, we consider unacceptable what we have been able to observe in some images which show one of the leaders of far-right movements giving orders to officials responsible for public order”. The secretariat’s complaint national team of the Silp Cgil arrives when the controversy is more bloody than ever. And it is written in black and white, in the widespread note, that there was someone from Casapound or the Patriots Network who “gave” during the neo-fascist march. orders to public officials”.
A very serious fact that the policemen’s union stigmatises, adding that those who decided to allow the neo-fascist demonstration “did not take into account the delicate context in which the demonstrations took place and created the conditions for the intensification of clashes and tensions” .
The reply from the Police Headquarters: “Normal dialogue”
Table of Contents
The Bologna police headquarters responds to the union, “categorically” denying that members of Casapound or others “have influenced the decisions adopted regarding the methods of carrying out the initiative”. The discussions that took place between the officials of the police headquarters and the promoters are part “of the normal dialogue that during each demonstration it takes place in order to guarantee its orderly and peaceful development”. “This – adds the police headquarters – when it comes to pre-announced demonstrations, is always carried out regardless of the nature of the initiative and the identity of its organizers. And in this case the discussions certainly had a positive outcome since the demonstration had a shorter duration and ended before arriving in Piazza XX Settembre, where, according to notice, it should have ended”.
to the controversy
Clashes in Bologna, Lepore in Meloni: “You sent us 300 black shirts. Piantedosi must respond on public order”
by Silvia Bignami
The union: “Solidarity with policemen”
The national secretariat of the union reminds us that public safety must be ensured “without infiltration or external pressure from any group or political movement”. The union appeals to the unity of the police forces, “who should never even be pulled by the jacket”.
And again, the Silp CGIL expresses “its solidarity with the policemen and women who were involved in the serious incidents that occurred in Bologna, on the occasion of the demonstration of neo-fascist movements, far right and antagonistic groups”. And he recalls how “these unacceptable events unfortunately lead to situations already known, where workers in uniform often find themselves having to face the consequences of social tensions and public clashes, without being adequately protected and respected”.
The case
Casapound parades in Bologna, police-antagonists clashes. Meloni: left accomplice
by Giuseppe Baldessarro
The CGIL policemen attack by recalling that the agents “are not cannon fodder”, and underline how “the concession of demonstration spaces to movements with strong fascist connotations, especially in symbolic places such as Piazza XX Settembre in Bologna, which recalls some of the most serious episodes of neo-fascist violence in Italian history, appears not only inappropriate, but also irresponsible”.
#Clashes #Bologna #SilpCgil #leader #gave #orders #public #officials
–
## Expert Interview: Police Conduct During Neo-Fascist March in Bologna
**World-Today-News.com:** We are joined today by Dr. Maria Rossi, a leading expert on policing and public order, to discuss the recent controversy surrounding the neo-fascist march in Bologna. Dr.Rossi, thank you for joining us.
**Dr. Rossi:** It’s a pleasure to be here.
The Silp Cgil union has accused officials within the Bologna police force of taking orders from far-right leaders during the march. Have you ever encountered anything like this in your research?
**Dr. Rossi:** While I cannot speak directly to the specific events in Bologna, the situation is certainly concerning. The integrity and impartiality of law enforcement are fundamental pillars of any democratic society.Allegations of undue influence from extremist groups on police conduct are incredibly serious and require thorough inquiry.
**World-Today-News.com:** The Bologna police headquarters has denied these accusations, stating that conversations with march organizers were part of “normal dialog” aimed at ensuring a peaceful exhibition.What are your thoughts on this?
**Dr. Rossi:** Open communication between organizers and law enforcement is essential for facilitating safe and orderly protests. However, there’s a crucial distinction between dialogue and allowing external entities to dictate police tactics.If
genuine concerns about undue influence exist, they should be investigated transparently by an self-reliant body.
The Silp Cgil has also criticized the decision to allow the march to proceed given the “delicate context” and the potential for violence. Do you believe law enforcement should take the ideology of protestors into account when making decisions about permits and security measures?
**Dr. Rossi:**
This is a complex issue. While the right to peaceful assembly is a cornerstone of democracy, authorities also have a duty to protect public safety and prevent violence.
The decision to allow a demonstration should be based on a thorough risk assessment that considers all potential dangers, including the ideologies and past actions of the organizers.
Transparency in this process is crucial to building public trust.
What steps can be taken to prevent similar situations from arising in the future?
**Dr. Rossi:**
First and foremost, robust internal oversight mechanisms are essential to ensure police accountability and prevent undue influence. Clear guidelines and protocols regarding communication with protest organizers should be established and strictly adhered to.
Moreover, ongoing training for law enforcement personnel on identifying and responding to extremist influences is paramount.
building strong community relationships and promoting open dialogue between law enforcement and diverse communities can help foster trust and prevent the escalation of tensions.
Dr. Rossi, thank you for sharing your valuable insights on this important issue.
**Dr. Rossi:** Thank you for having me.
