BOLOGNA – “We firmly condemn violence, regardless of its origin. However, we consider unacceptable what we have been able to observe in some images which show one of the leaders of far-right movements giving orders to officials responsible for public order”. The secretariat’s complaint national team of the Silp Cgil arrives when the controversy is more bloody than ever. And it is written in black and white, in the widespread note, that there was someone from Casapound or the Patriots Network who “gave” during the neo-fascist march. orders to public officials”.
A very serious fact that the policemen’s union stigmatises, adding that those who decided to allow the neo-fascist demonstration “did not take into account the delicate context in which the demonstrations took place and created the conditions for the intensification of clashes and tensions” .
The reply from the Police Headquarters: “Normal dialogue”
Table of Contents
The Bologna police headquarters responds to the union, “categorically” denying that members of Casapound or others “have influenced the decisions adopted regarding the methods of carrying out the initiative”. The discussions that took place between the officials of the police headquarters and the promoters are part “of the normal dialogue that during each demonstration it takes place in order to guarantee its orderly and peaceful development”. “This – adds the police headquarters – when it comes to pre-announced demonstrations, is always carried out regardless of the nature of the initiative and the identity of its organizers. And in this case the discussions certainly had a positive outcome since the demonstration had a shorter duration and ended before arriving in Piazza XX Settembre, where, according to notice, it should have ended”.
to the controversy
Clashes in Bologna, Lepore in Meloni: “You sent us 300 black shirts. Piantedosi must respond on public order”
by Silvia Bignami
The union: “Solidarity with policemen”
The national secretariat of the union reminds us that public safety must be ensured “without infiltration or external pressure from any group or political movement”. The union appeals to the unity of the police forces, “who should never even be pulled by the jacket”.
And again, the Silp CGIL expresses “its solidarity with the policemen and women who were involved in the serious incidents that occurred in Bologna, on the occasion of the demonstration of neo-fascist movements, far right and antagonistic groups”. And he recalls how “these unacceptable events unfortunately lead to situations already known, where workers in uniform often find themselves having to face the consequences of social tensions and public clashes, without being adequately protected and respected”.
The case
Casapound parades in Bologna, police-antagonists clashes. Meloni: left accomplice
by Giuseppe Baldessarro
The CGIL policemen attack by recalling that the agents “are not cannon fodder”, and underline how “the concession of demonstration spaces to movements with strong fascist connotations, especially in symbolic places such as Piazza XX Settembre in Bologna, which recalls some of the most serious episodes of neo-fascist violence in Italian history, appears not only inappropriate, but also irresponsible”.
#Clashes #Bologna #SilpCgil #leader #gave #orders #public #officials
–
## Expert Interview: Neo-fascist March in Bologna Fuels Controversy
**World-today-News,** November 12, 2024
The recent neo-fascist march in Bologna has sparked fierce debate, notably regarding allegations of far-right leaders influencing police decisions during the exhibition. We spoke with Dr. Marco Rossi,Professor of Law and Security at the University of Bologna,to analyse the situation.
**World-Today-News:** Professor Rossi,the police union,Silp Cgil,has accused far-right figures of giving orders to police officials during the march. How concerning is this allegation?
**Dr. Rossi:** This is a very serious allegation that necessitates thorough investigation. The implication of external groups dictating police conduct during a demonstration is deeply troubling, undermining the principle of impartial law enforcement. It erodes public trust in the police and raises concerns about the potential for abuse of power.
**World-Today-News:** The Bologna police headquarters has denied these claims, stating the discussions with march organizers were part of “normal dialog” to ensure a peaceful demonstration. Do you find their description convincing?
**Dr.Rossi:** While “normal dialogue” between police and organizers is standard practice, the specifics of these interactions are crucial. Were the discussions truly focused on ensuring public safety, or did they involve concessions to the organizers’ demands that possibly compromised police impartiality? This requires further clarification and transparency from the authorities.
**World-Today-News:** What are the potential dangers of allowing any political group, particularly those promoting extremist ideologies, to exert influence over police actions?
**Dr. Rossi:** Allowing any group, regardless of their ideology, to dictate police conduct sets a dangerous precedent. It politicizes law enforcement and creates a perception of bias,undermining the rule of law. It can also embolden extremist groups, leading to a further escalation of tensions and violence.
**World-Today-News:** What steps should be taken to address this situation and prevent similar occurrences in the future?
**Dr.Rossi:** A comprehensive self-reliant investigation is imperative to determine the veracity of the allegations and establish the facts surrounding the police-organizer interactions. Clear guidelines and protocols need to be established to prevent any undue influence from extremist groups on law enforcement decisions.
Furthermore, promoting transparency and accountability within police forces is vital to building public trust and ensuring the impartial submission of the law. addressing the underlying social and political factors that contribute to the rise of extremist ideologies is crucial for creating a more inclusive and tolerant society.
**World-Today-News:** Thank you for your insights, Professor Rossi.
