Regional Hotel @WilliamPham
The president of the LR of the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region has started a project to change the rules within the community. The opposition denounces a text that wants to “illegitimate, undemocratic governance that favors the rights of some elected officials and not all“.
Although he only took control of the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region in September after the election of Laurent Wauquiez in the legislative elections early this summer, Fabrice Pannekoucke has already decided to review the rules within the community. A measure that caused misunderstanding and then ire from opposition groups, because of its supposed timing and objectives.
“We are at the point of ridicule…”begins Johan Cesa, co-president of the socialist group. And to continue: “Don’t we have other priorities right now?“Basically, several measures scare these opponents. “bunkering“, specifically the duty that the executive wants to impose on all organizations to “prior approval“inviting a person into the council seats.”Until now, we had to tell our visitors to the reception. It is the bayonet of the face“, insulting Johan Cesa.
A”bunkering“from the front?
Table of Contents
The internal rules also specify “the national or local security context may lead to the limitation of these rules“. But as he likes? Anyone – including accredited journalists – who has already entered the Hôtel de Région knows that the existing controls are particularly strict , and the trip under supervision too. When asked, the Department wants to be confident that such permission will only be needed for “visit the institution“or a”use of common spaces“. And specify:”On the other hand, meetings of political groups and regional elected officials, whether journalists, candidates for current employment, or any other positions, are held at the discretion of the group and relevant elected officials without prior permission. hand if they are organized on the premises and if they welcome their guests.“
Another sticking point: the executive wants to ban tricolor scarves on elected officials of the regional council. It is therefore based on article D2122-4 of the CGCT stating “using, in public and without right, this sign reserved for public authority is punished with the sanctions provided for in article L.433-14 of the penal code which punishes with one year in prison and a fine of 15,000 euros“.
The Department despises the “dishonest approach“against
However, as the socialist group says, this text does not apply to regional and general councilors, but only mayors, deputy chiefs and town councillors. Asking, the Department continues and signs, revealing “the proven will of the regional councilors of the opposition, especially the National Rally and the Ecologists who would like to give themselves this special sign hand in hand which could make them believe that the powers of a legal police officer or official their civil. no status in any way are allowed arguments“. And specify:”Whether it is an opposition councilor or a member of the regional executive who officially represents the institution, this symbol of public authority cannot be used.“The Socialist group sees to this point”an inappropriate desire to make regional elected officials invisible, and especially opposition elected officials“.
In general, in its response to our editors, the community despises that the opposition has “wants to give a public opinion on the elements of a debate that started between all the political groups”see there”dishonest approach“The socialist group says they will communicate. “his requests for changes to the internal rules and the elimination of these various points”. And he said:We hope to be heard.“The Conference of Presidents will meet on Monday 2 December to “talk again about possible changes to the internal rules“, specifies the Department. Finally, the thematic commission “finance and general administration” will be referred to and will meet on December 5 for a new work on the final consideration that will be proposed by the executive , before it is discussed at a plenary assembly and voting on this new regulation on December 19 and 20.
2024-11-29 16:08:00
#project #change #rules #Aura #Division
## “Bunkering” or Responsible Governance? A Conversation on Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region’s New Rules
**World Today News** sits down with Dr. Anne-Laure dubois, a leading expert on regional governance and political science at Sciences Po Grenoble, to unpack the controversy surrounding the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region’s proposed new internal rules.
**World Today News:** Dr. Dubois, the new president of the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region, Fabrice Pannekoucke, has initiated a review of the region’s internal rules, sparking fierce debate. Can you shed light on the core issues at stake?
**Dr. Dubois:** The proposed changes, as outlined by the opposition, raise concerns about transparency and democratic practices within the regional council. The requirement for prior approval for any external visitor to council meetings,as a notable example,seems particularly contentious.
Opponents, primarily from the socialist group, characterize this measure as “bunkering,” suggesting an attempt to isolate the executive branch and limit access to deliberation.They argue that this hampers the open exchange of ideas and contributes to a lack of accountability.
**World Today News:** The opposition also highlights the timing of these changes, coming shortly after President Pannekoucke took office. What do you make of this argument?
**Dr. Dubois:** It’s true that the swiftness of these changes, barely a month after the new president assumed office, has fuelled suspicions among opposition members. They see it as a power grab aimed at cementing control over the regional council.
However, it’s crucial to remember that new administrations often review existing regulations and processes. It remains to be seen whether these specific changes are motivated by genuine concerns about security and efficiency or are, as the opposition suggests, a tactic to stifle dissent.
**World Today News:** The document also mentions situations where national or local security concerns might necessitate limitations on visitor access. How should we balance the need for security with the principles of openness and transparency?
**Dr. Dubois:** This is a complex dilemma. Balancing security needs with democratic principles requires careful consideration.
While access to public institutions should be as open as possible, there are legitimate situations where security risks might necessitate temporary restrictions.
The key is ensuring that any such restrictions are clearly justified, proportionate to the risk, and subject to appropriate oversight and review.
**World Today News:** Looking ahead, what are the potential implications of these controversial changes for the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region?
**Dr. Dubois:** The outcome of this debate will have significant implications for the region’s governance. If the opposition’s concerns are validated and the changes are perceived as an attack on democratic principles, it could lead to increased tensions and mistrust between the executive and the legislature.
Conversely, if the president can demonstrate a compelling need for these changes and ensure proper safeguards against abuse, it might pave the way for more efficient and secure regional governance.
Ultimately, the citizens of the Auvergne-rhône Alpes Region will need to carefully scrutinize these proposed changes and hold their elected officials accountable for ensuring a obvious and democratic governance structure.
