Laziomania: penalty denied and away bans, treatment that makes you think. Penalized and discriminated against | Front page | Calciomercato.com
/
-
Home
-
Laziomania: penalty denied and away bans, treatment that makes you think. Penalized and…
Transfer market editorial team
- UEFA, here is the episode that slows down Baroni’s men. An obvious penalty kick which for reasons not well defined was not decreed by the race director and which would – evidently – have been able to direct the challenge towards another victory for the Romans. Not overly deserved, as has practically always happened at the start of the season, but still three precious points.
Lazio did not play one of its best matches of the season and above all suffered – this time yes – from the massive turnover and changed pace in the second half. Noslin and Tchaouna stick again, while Rovella allows the Biancocelesti to increase the engine speed and change pace. But Send remains practically inactive and Isaksen’s flash in the Ludogorets penalty area could have been decisive and would have given Pedro the opportunity to convert a penalty kick from the spot.The numbers are all on the side of the Biancocelesti, However, despite constant pressing throughout the 90 minutes, they were unable to materialize the amount of play and create clear opportunities. But if the draw at the Olimpico leaves bitterness in the mouth for a match influenced by the referee, What shook up the week in the Biancoceleste environment was the decision to ban Lazio fans from traveling ahead of the Europa League match scheduled for December 12th.
The mayor of Amsterdamsupported by the police chief and the Attorney General, decided to follow the same line, banning travel to all Italians with the motivation of prevention possible ‘racist and anti-Semitic’ behaviour. The absurdity of the restriction which – let us remember – penalizes the fans, many of whom had already purchased flights and accommodation to follow Baroni’s team at the Johan Cruyff Arena,i extends to all Italian citizens, regardless of their footballing faith.A decision that appears discriminatory, damages the image of the fans and the Biancoceleste club, economically penalizes the fans who had already booked flights and accommodation for the away match, and which recalls the one taken in November 2021 by the French Minister of the Interior, when the Lazio were prevented from going to Marseille for fear of clashes between OM supporters and the Biancocelesti.
The city hall declared through an official note that “SS Lazio fans are not welcome in Amsterdam”, in a climate of apprehension also due to the tensions that exploded three weeks ago during Ajax-Maccabi Tel Aviv, between Israeli supporters and pro-Palestine groups. A controversial measure, with discriminatory and racist features, adopted to prevent possible episodes of anti-Semitism and religious discrimination.Yet another gratuitous attack on a fan base to which they have been attached definitive labels, without room for reply. A generalization, discrimination and hatred that the football and political authorities should fight but which end up fueling with absurd choices, which affect those who would just like to enjoy a trip with their team.
A shocking and shocking decision Lazio, which on 24 October had to deal with racist insults and howls from Twente fans in Enschede directed at one of their players, Loum Tchaouna. If it wasn’t all certified by official press releases and statements from political leaders, it would all seem like a joke.All UPDATES in REAL TIME! Join the CALCIOMERCATO.COM WHATSAPP channel: click here
This article discusses a controversial series of events surrounding Lazio’s recent Europa League matches, alleging unfair treatment and discrimination.
**Here’s a breakdown:**
* **Disputed penalty:** Lazio drew against Ludogorets, with a potential game-changing penalty决策 not awarded to them.The author believes it was a clear foul and cites the lack of intervention from VAR as questionable. They suggest this incident, combined with other recent events, raises questions about potential bias against Lazio.
* **Amsterdam travel ban:** A more serious issue discussed is the ban on Italian fans traveling to the upcoming Lazio vs. Ajax match in Amsterdam. This decision, made by the Amsterdam authorities, cites concerns about potential “racist and anti-Semitic” behaviour from Italian fans.
* **Allegations of discrimination:** The author strongly criticizes this travel ban, labeling it discriminatory and unjustified.They point out that it penalizes all Italian citizens, regardless of their football affiliations.
* **Impact and consequences:** The article highlights the financial and emotional impact on Lazio fans who had already made travel arrangements and now face meaningful losses. It also criticizes the damage to Lazio’s image and questions the basis for the ban.
The article ends abruptly, possibly due to truncation.
**Key points:**
* The author believes Lazio was unfairly treated in both incidents: the denied penalty and the travel ban.
* They strongly criticize the Amsterdam authorities’ decision, calling it discriminatory and unjustified.
* The article raises questions about bias against Lazio and the potential for prejudice in refereeing decisions.
The article clearly expresses the author’s opinion and presents a one-sided viewpoint. It would be
beneficial to consider other viewpoints and facts for a balanced understanding of the situation.
video-container">Related posts:
New Study Shows Liver Prepares for Food Before First Bite, Leading to Potential Treatment for Type 2...Here's How the South Tangerang City Government Strengthens Distribution of Social Assistance to Over...five amazing health benefitsLa Jornada - Venezuela is capable of producing Cuban anti-Covid dose: vice president
