The Family Union, formerly known as “La Manif pour tous”, launched a petition against this project which is currently being developed. As Franceinfo could see, this draft program is very far from the accusations made by its president.
Published on 27/11/2024 09:23
Updated on 27/11/2024 12:55
Reading time: 4min
Even before it was presented, it is already controversial. The new programsexuality education which the Ministry of National Education has been working on for over a year and a half, is the subject of a smear campaign from conservative associations, very active on Facebook and X.
The Family Union, formerly known as “The Revelation for All”to launch a petition against this project. Its president, Ludovine de La Rochère, denied, Sunday November 24, on CNews that “Ideological brainwashing from age 3”. “For adults to come and talk to children about sex without their consent. That’s a problem.”
Franceinfo was able to consult this draft program, which the ministry specifies still needs to be reviewed, and it is very long, in its philosophy as in its practical implementation, from the accusations made by Ludovine de La Rochère.
In kindergarten and primary school, it is a question of education in emotional and relational life. The term sexuality is added only for middle and high school. Strictly speaking, sexual relations are not mentioned from the 4th grade onwards. At this point, the students are teenagers.
The Ministry of National Education wants: this learning will be very advanced.
Obviously aware of the possible revolution, the document lists principles that teachers must have: neutrality, temperance, rejection of all dogmatism. The sessions need to be thought of in relation to other subjects.as well as moral and civic education (EMC) and with media and information education (EMI)”, project details. And he says: “Parents of students will be notified.”
First, between three and six years of age, children learn, for example, how to name the different parts of their body, to identify their feelings and others, to express their tastes by ‘ eliminate gender stereotypes.
From CP until entering 6th grade, emphasis is placed on building human relationships, different family models, respect and self-esteem. How can you say no? What is a situation of violence or harassment? The program recommends including a permission comment from the CM2 class.
Finally, in middle and high school, the goal is to help adolescents take care of their body, accept themselves, define their choices, but also respect their rights and the rights of others. Without forgetting the desire to make them aware of intimacy in the age of social networks.
In its project, the ministry proposes to establish games and discussions, based on literary works, films or even testimonials. The only framework imposed on establishments is the size of these sessions: three hours a year at least, as prepared law of July 4, 2001.
This program project, initiated by Pap Ndiaye, Anne Genetet’s predecessor, was born from the idea that this duty was to provide sexuality education. “in schools, colleges and high schools” it is not certain.
2024-11-27 13:53:00
#national #program #preparing #talk #children #sex #consent
**What are the potential risks and benefits of implementing a mandated, national sexuality education program like the one described in France?**
This article discusses a new program for sexuality education in France, generating controversy even before its release. Here are some open-ended questions focused on the key topics, designed to encourage discussion and explore different viewpoints:
**Section 1: The Controversy**
* What are the main arguments being made by those who oppose the new sexuality education program? Do you find these arguments convincing? Why or why not?
* The Family Union calls the program “ideological brainwashing” and claims children are being taught about sex without consent. How do you understand these claims, and do you agree with this characterization of the program?
* Do you think parents should have the right to opt their children out of sexuality education? Why or why not?
**Section 2: Content of the Program**
* The article states that the program focuses on building human relationships, different family models, and respect and self-esteem in elementary school. Do you think these topics are appropriate for young children? What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of addressing these issues in school?
* How does the program approach discussing sexuality in middle and high school? Do you think the content is appropriate for these age groups? Why or why not?
* The program aims to make students aware of intimacy in the age of social networks. How important do you think this is, and how should schools address this topic?
**Section 3: Role of Schools and Parents**
* What is the role of schools in providing sexuality education to children and teenagers?
* Do you think schools are adequately equipped to teach these topics? What kind of training would be beneficial for teachers?
* How can parents and schools work together to ensure that children receive comprehensive and age-appropriate sexuality education?
**Section 4: Broader Context**
* The article mentions that France has a law mandating sexuality education in schools. What are the arguments for and against making sexuality education compulsory in schools?
* How does France’s approach to sexuality education compare to other countries? What can we learn from other models?
* What are the potential long-term benefits of comprehensive sexuality education for individuals and society as a whole?
This interview structure encourages a nuanced and insightful exploration of the complexities surrounding sexuality education. It allows for diverse perspectives while ultimately fostering a deeper understanding of the topic.
:quality(70):focal(1028x782:1038x792)/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/liberation/I2NID7V3CFFFLBBAHQIOGGO3KU.jpg "In Rennes, a separate library for the development of the “collective book”.")
