Member C said he recommended Hong Myung-bo, Poyet, and Casas, but Wagner was also included in the vote.
-In the meeting data, Director Hong Myung-bo tied for first place… I can’t tell from the meeting minutes.
-Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, study based on meeting materials… Sports Ethics Center receiving reports from committee members
– Meeting minutes for the Ethics Center investigation? Meeting materials? Ambiguous standards
The Sports Ethics Center pointed out in the review committee’s decision that there was a difference between the minutes of the 10th Power Development Committee meeting and the data of the meeting organized in records. At the same time, Coach Wagner announced that Coach Hong Myung-bo, who was alone as the first place, was confirmed as the second place.
Confusion arose because this contradicted the results of a Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism investigation into the Football Association, which said, “It is true that Coach Hong Myung-bo got most suggestions.
Commissioner A’s recommendation was what the Ethics Center said.
“Commissioner A said he was recommending 5 people, but the meeting materials show he only recommended 3 people,” he said. According to the minutes of the meeting, member A said, “I recommend the three recommended by member B (Director Hong Myung-bo, Wagner, and Director Poyet), Casas, and Director Arnold.”
However, since the record shows that member A only recommended directors Hong Myung-bo, Poyet, and Arnold, the Ethics Center claims that if the omitted Wagner is added, it Wagner is the most recommended. He also explained that after examining member A, he found it correct to recommend five people.
The Ethics Center only raised issues regarding member A, but in fact, there were more issues where the comments in the minutes of the meeting and the records in the materials of the meeting were not the same.
In the minutes of the meeting, it is shown that member C recommended three people, saying, “I also recommend Poyet and coach Hong Myung-bo. I also want to remember coach Casas.”
However, the record shows that, in addition to Hong Myung-bo, Poyet, and Casas, four people were proposed, including Director Wagner.
Director Wagner, who was not present in Committee Member C’s comments at the meeting, is on the record.
After investigating member C, the Ethics Center said it was correct that member C recommended Director Wagner.
This could raise doubts about the method of investigation as to whether the Ethics Center applied a double standard by receiving a statement from member A based on the minutes of the meeting and receiving a statement from member C based on meeting data .
The beginning of the problem was that the minutes of the meeting, which only contained official comments at the meeting, and the materials of the meeting that came from that just did not match.
And although the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism believed that the record of the results of the meetings was organized through discussion, the Ethics Center carried out investigations and investigations in different ways, including ‘ receiving post-facto statements from committee members, causing confusion.
The Football Association reported that the committee members at the time used their free time to add or withdraw proposals.
He also explained that as the list of recommendations was displayed on the screen, the committee members confirmed all the candidates they recommended.
Whether Coach Hong Myung-bo was recommended or not, it is not a problem that the Chairman of the Power Strengthening Committee Jeong Hae-seong recommended Director Hong Myung-bo as the first choice and became the subject of – priority setting.
Yonhap News TV article questions and reports: KakaoTalk / Line jebo23
Reporter Jeong Joo-hee ([email protected])
2024-11-27 05:53:00
#Yonhap #News
Given the discrepancy between the meeting minutes and records, what specific evidence could be examined to determine if the selection process was deliberately manipulated or if the inconsistencies are due to unintentional errors?
## World Today News Interview: Discrepancies in the Power Strengthening Committee Selection Process
**Introduction:**
Welcome back to World Today News. Today we delve into the controversy surrounding the selection process for the Power Strengthening Committee. Joining us are two guests with expertise in sports governance and ethical conduct.
**Our Guests:**
* **Dr. Lee Soo-Jung:** Professor of Sports Management at Seoul National University, specializing in ethical decision-making within sports organizations.
* **Attorney Kim Min-Jae:** Legal expert in sports law, focusing on transparency and fairness in sports governance.
**Section 1: Conflicting Accounts (Minutes vs. Records)**
**Host:**
The article highlights a disturbing discrepancy between the minutes of the Power Strengthening Committee meeting and the associated records. Dr. Lee, what are your initial thoughts on this discrepancy and what implications could this have for the legitimacy of the selection process?
**Dr. Lee:**
**Host:**
Attorney Kim, from a legal standpoint, do these inconsistencies raise concerns about potential procedural irregularities? What legal recourse, if any, might be available to address these concerns?
**Attorney Kim:**
**Section 2: The Role of the Sports Ethics Center**
**Host:**
The Sports Ethics Center played a key role in investigating this matter. Dr. Lee, do you believe their approach was comprehensive and unbiased, particularly given their reliance on post-facto statements from committee members?
**Dr. Lee:**
**Host:**
Attorney Kim, what are your observations on the methodology used by the Ethics Center? Is there room for improvement in their investigative process to ensure greater transparency and accountability?
**Attorney Kim:**
**Section 3: Impact on Public Trust and Future Decisions**
**Host:**
This controversy has undoubtedly shaken public trust in the selection process. What steps should the Football Association take to restore faith and ensure impartiality in future decisions?
**Dr. Lee:**
**Host:**
Looking ahead, Attorney Kim, what measures can be implemented to prevent such discrepancies from occurring in the future and promote a more transparent and accountable selection process within sports organizations?
**Attorney Kim:**
**Conclusion:**
The selection process for the Power Strengthening Committee has sparked important questions about transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct within sports organizations.
We thank Dr. Lee and Attorney Kim for their insightful perspectives on this complex issue. We encourage viewers to stay informed and actively participate in discussions that promote fairness and integrity in the world of sports.
**[Closing Remarks]**
