Jacqueline Fernandes is also implicated in the money laundering case of big thug Sukesh Chandrashekhar. Sukesh has taken the name of the actress many times and said that despite knowing the truth, he took expensive gifts from the accused. Now the statement of Jacqueline Fernandes’s lawyer has also come out. In the court he once again declared the actress innocent. He has said that a money laundering case cannot be filed against the actress. She was not involved in any activity for financial gain. Let us tell you what updates have come out from this case.
Jacqueline Fernandes’ lawyer presented her side in the money laundering case in Delhi High Court. Where he told the court that the ongoing case against the actress was baseless. ED had filed chargesheet against the actress in this case. Now the next hearing in this case will be on 3rd December.
What did Jacqueline Fernandes’s lawyer say?
Jacqueline Fernandes’s lawyers Siddharth Aggarwal, Prashant Patil and Shakti Pandey presented her side. Whereas Zoheb Hussain was present on behalf of ED. The actress’s lawyer said that if someone is involved in criminal activity out of greed for money, then this case can be initiated against him. But Jacqueline Fernandes has not taken any such benefit nor was she a part of it.
Jacqueline Fernandes did not know her crime horoscope
Jacqueline Fernandes’ lawyer also said that the actress was unaware of Sukesh Chandrashekhar’s truth. He did not know that the gifts given to him were bought with ill-gotten money. Neither did the actress know his crime horoscope nor was she involved in it.
Can’t watch with family… TV’s ‘Ram’ Arun Govil challenges in Parliament against increasing obscenity on OTT
The photos shocked me
Let us tell you, there are many serious allegations against Sukesh Chandrashekhar. He is in jail in a money laundering case worth Rs 200 crore. Some photos of Sukesh and Jacqueline also surfaced, after which there was a stir.
Latest News in HindiTo read Bollywood News, Tech News, Auto News, Career News and Rashifal, download the app of Zee News Hindi, the country’s most trusted news website. Stay connected with all the latest news and information in just one click.
**1. Given the public nature of this case and the significant media attention surrounding it, how might pre-trial publicity affect Jacqueline Fernandes’ right to an impartial jury? What measures could be taken to mitigate the potential influence of media coverage on the jury selection process?**
## World Today News Exclusive: The Jacqueline Fernandes Case
**Welcome to World Today News’ exclusive interview regarding the ongoing money laundering case implicating Bollywood actress Jacqueline Fernandes. Joining us today are two esteemed guests.**
**[Guest 1 Name], a renowned legal expert specializing in financial crimes, and [Guest 2 Name], a prominent Bollywood commentator with years of experience analyzing the industry.**
**Thank you both for being here.**
**The first section of our interview will focus on the legal complexities surrounding this case.**
**[To Guest 1]**
* Jacqueline Fernandes’ lawyer argues that she has not profited financially from the alleged crime and was unaware of Sukesh Chandrashekhar’s criminal activities. How strong is this defense in a money laundering case, and what are the key elements prosecutors would need to prove to secure a conviction?
* The article mentions Sukesh Chandrashekhar’s past convictions. How might these past legal issues impact the prosecution’s case against Jacqueline Fernandes? Is there a risk of prejudice against her due to her association with a known criminal?
**Moving onto the broader implications for the Bollywood industry, our conversation will now turn to you, [Guest 2].**
* This case has garnered significant media attention. Do you believe this could impact Jacqueline Fernandes’ career, even if she is ultimately cleared of all charges?
* Do you think there’s a need for greater awareness and scrutiny within the Bollywood industry regarding the backgrounds of individuals actors may associate with?
**Next, we’ll delve into the social dimensions of this case.**
* **[To both Guests] **
* The article briefly touches upon the public’s reaction to photos of Jacqueline Fernandes and Sukesh Chandrashekhar. What are your thoughts on the ethical implications of publicizing such images? Does it contribute to a fair and impartial legal process?
* This case raises questions about the responsibilities of public figures. To what extent can celebrities be held accountable for the actions of individuals they associate with, even outside their professional sphere?
**let’s look ahead**
* **[To Guest 1]**
* What are the potential legal outcomes in this case? What factors might influence the judge’s decision, and what implications could this have for future cases involving celebrities and financial crimes?
* **[Concluding Remarks to both Guests]**
Thank you both for sharing your invaluable insights on this complex and multifaceted case. As the legal proceedings continue, World Today News will continue to provide updates and analysis on this developing story.