Analytical errors that even an excellent referee can make
Szymon Marciniak directed by Sports–Arsenal in Alvalade. The Polish international was assisted by teammate Tomasz Kwiatkowski (it was VAR). Marciniak has had an amazing career, rightfully considered one of the best in the world. But in an arrangement, even this recognition is not synonymous with accuracy. The game had several analytical errors, but it is fair to emphasize that they did not obstruct justice in terms of the winner of the game.
Below is a technical analysis of the most relevant trends in the game:
3′ The first yellow card of the game that was shown to Diomande, for a reason that the images did not clarify (probably complaints by the assistant referee).
7′ One of the many interesting situations in the challenge: Arsenal’s first goal was well determined, because neither Bukayo Saka (first) nor Martinelli (later) were in an irregular position. Had the ball not gone in, it is almost certain that Sporting would have been penalized with a penalty kick, due to a very obvious hold/drag by St. Fits Harveytz’s left arm.
 "Sport-Arsenal, 1-5 analysis Duarte Gomes on the referee: sportsman to be suspended (twice) | Abola.br | Abola.eu")
21′ Excellent new analysis from the assistant referee when determining England’s second team, scored by Harvetz. Saka was never in an illegal position.
32′ Marked very offside for Arsenal’s attack. However, Saka was taken down by Morita right before him. Marciniak could have survived the first break, pointing a free kick straight to the Londoners.
37′ Declan Rice fired dangerously at Franco Israel’s goal, capping off a fine move by Arsenal’s attack. Some Portuguese players “asked to handle the ball and be offside, but for no reason.
45+1′ Arsenal’s third goal scored by Gabriel Magalhães after a corner kick. Here too, if the ball hadn’t gone in, Marciniak would surely have called for a penalty for Arsenal. It’s just that Diomande added to the way he marked Harvetz, using his arms too much (he hit his opponent twice in the face/head)
50′ Havertz’s right arm controlled the ball illegally, starting a dangerous move for his team. The disturbance escaped the referee’s scrutiny.
52′ Raya served time again (he had done it before), and was duly warned
63′ Diomande aimed for the ball, but his right foot only connected with Odegaard’s left heel, bringing him down in his box. The penalty shot was well conceded. The center forward’s interception stopped the opponent’s clear scoring chance. Due to the end of the triple penalty, the Sporting defender should have received a second yellow card and a subsequent red card. The match referee made a mistake there.
)
)
news-item-description ellipsis-2-line">Diomande foul in the area on Odegaard inside the penalty area
67′ A curled ball, after a shot by Gyokeres, was saved by Raya before crossing his goal line. The referee and the tech decided correctly. Cool throw.
69′ Diomande must “review” the way he uses his hands and arms when marking opponents, under penalty of being penalized and, more importantly, punishing his team . In this case, the Ivorian defender saw Havertz approaching him, blocked him with his body and then stretched his right arm towards the opponent’s neck/face, hitting him. There is a conscious and deliberate action of the player within the situation of violent behavior. Penalty kick to be awarded and red card to be shown.
)
82′ At the time of Merino’s shot, Trossard (who successfully reloaded) was in a legal position. Arsenal’s fifth goal was well proved.
90+3′ Trossard singled himself out, missing an opportunity in a promising field. The Belgian striker started from his own midfield, therefore from a legal position.
2024-11-26 23:05:00
#SportArsenal #analysis #Duarte #Gomes #referee #sportsman #suspended #Abola.br #Abola.eu
**Considering the controversial nature of some refereeing decisions, do you believe Sporting has a legitimate grievance or are they simply disgruntled by the outcome of the match?**
## Open-Ended Questions for Discussion:
This article dives deep into a controversial football match between Sporting and Arsenal, focusing on the referee’s calls and VAR decisions.
**Let’s divide the discussion into thematic sections:**
**I. Referee Performance & VAR:**
* **Overall:** How would you rate the performance of referee Szymon Marciniak in this match? Was he generally accurate, or were there recurring issues with his decisions?
* **Objectivity:** Do you think Marciniak’s reputation as one of the world’s best referees influenced the perception of his performance, either positively or negatively?
* **VAR**: Do you think VAR played a helpful role in this match, or did it create more controversy? Were there specific instances where you felt VAR was used correctly or incorrectly?
* **Diomande’s Foul:** The article highlights Diomande’s foul on Odegaard in the penalty area. Considering the context and replays, do you believe a red card was warranted?
* **Impact of Decisions:** How did the referee’s decisions, both correct and incorrect, influence the outcome of the match?
**II. Sporting’s Performance:**
* **Defensive Struggles:**
The article extensively analyzes several defensive miscues by Sporting. Do you think these errors were a result of individual mistakes, poor tactical decisions, or a combination of factors?
* **Impact on Morale:** How might the referee’s decisions have affected Sporting’s morale and confidence throughout the match?
**III. Arsenal’s Performance:**
* **Clinical Finishing:**
Arsenal scored five goals in this match. How would you assess their attacking performance? Were they clinical in front of goal, or did Sporting make many defensive errors?
* **Tactical Adjustments:** Did Mikel Arteta make any tactical adjustments during the game to exploit Sporting’s weaknesses?
**IV. Broader Implications:**
* **Refereeing Consistency:**
This article highlights several debatable refereeing decisions. What steps can be taken to ensure greater consistency in refereeing across different leagues and competitions?
* **Impact on the Game:**
How can we minimize the impact of controversial refereeing decisions on the outcome of high-stakes matches?
* **Technology’s Role:**
As technology like VAR continues to evolve, what steps can be taken to maximize its benefits while minimizing its potential drawbacks in football?
These open-ended questions encourage discussion and diverse viewpoints, allowing for a deeper exploration of the complexities surrounding the match and the broader issues surrounding refereeing in football.
