Table of Contents
Russia said on Tuesday it had been targeted again in recent days by two Ukrainian strikes carried out using American ATACMS missiles (Army TACtical Missile System), a weapon that Moscow has promised a tough response against.
According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, Ukrainian forces hit “facilities” in the Russian border region of Kursk on November 23 near the town of Lotarevka, 37 km northwest of the city of Kursk, and on November 25 against Kursk-Vostochny airfield.
The ministry acknowledged, in a rare occurrence, that several missiles “hit their targets” and reported two wounded Russian soldiers and a damaged radar in the Ukrainian photos. According to him, three ATACMS missiles, with a range of 300 km, out of five were shot down by Russian anti-aircraft defense during the November 23 attack and seven out of eight projectiles were fired during the attack November 25.
“The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation is monitoring the situation and preparing a response,” he said in a statement, accompanying his message with photos that appear to show missile debris, which cannot be identified. independently verified.
Russia is preparing a response
“By examining the attack sites it was possible to confirm that the armed forces of Ukraine used American-made ATACMS tactical missiles,” the ministry said. Russian. The also says “preparing a response” to these attacks, which Russia considers crossing a red line.
The first Ukrainian attack using ATACAMS missiles took place on November 19 and on November 21, Kyiv forces destroyed British-made Storm Shadow missiles at Russia.
Russia responded by firing an intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile on November 21 at a weapons factory in the city of Dnipro, in east-central Ukraine.
This experimental missile, baptized Orechnik and previously unknown, designed to carry nuclear warheads, which was not the case during this attack. In response to Ukrainian strikes on Russian soil using Western missiles, Vladimir Putin promised and threatened to repeat this type of strike. aimed at Western countries who will help kyiv.
NATO and Ukraine meet in Brussels
In this very tight context, the ambassadors of NATO and Ukraine are meeting in Brussels on Tuesday. If kyiv said they expected “concrete” decisions from this meeting, the diplomats of the Federation were more cautious. Western ambassadors are expected to reaffirm their support for kyiv. The Kremlin, through his spokesman Dmitri Peskov, put aside the scope of the meeting: “It is unlikely that important decisions will be made at the ambassadorial level.”
This renewed tension also comes at a time when Europeans and Kyiv fear an end to American military aid to Ukraine when Donald Trump returns to the White House, and the conclusion of an agreement that will have a negative impact on Ukraine.
It seems that Moscow is trying to strengthen its position before a possible negotiation in the intensity of Russian attacks. Russia also received reinforcements of thousands of North Korean soldiers which, according to Washington, should fight the Ukrainian forces “soon”.
Military aid from Washington is crucial for Ukraine, whose exhausted army has been on the run for months against outnumbered and better-armed Russian troops. On Tuesday, Russia reported the capture of a new town, this time in the Kharkiv region (northeast).
2024-11-27 00:19:00
#War #Ukraine #Moscow #reports #ATACMS #missile #strikes #prepares #response
## World Today News: In-Depth Interview on Escalating Tensions
**Date:** November 27, 2024
**Host:** Welcome to World Today News, where we delve into the pressing issues shaping our world. Today, we’re discussing the escalating tensions between Russia and Ukraine following recent ATACMS missile strikes within Russian territory. Joining us are esteemed experts on military strategy and international relations: Dr. Anya Petrova, a conflict resolution specialist, and Mr. Sergei Ivanov, a former military analyst with deep knowledge of Russian defense strategies.
**Section 1: The Scope of the Conflict Escalation**
**Host:** Dr. Petrova, Russia claims these recent ATACMS attacks are crossing a “red line.” How do you interpret this rhetoric, and what are the potential implications for the broader conflict?
**Dr. Petrova:** The use of language like “red line” is intentionally provocative, aiming to frame the situation as a major escalation and potentially justify a strong Russian response. It’s crucial to separate rhetoric from reality. While concerning, these strikes, while navigating a sensitive zone, fall within the context of a war where both sides are actively targeting each other’s infrastructure and military capabilities.
**Host:** Mr. Ivanov, how do you see the use of ATACMS missiles by Ukraine changing the tactical landscape of the war?
**Mr. Ivanov:** The introduction of ATACMS significantly extends Ukraine’s striking range, posing a direct threat to Russian logistics and command centers deep within its territory. This could force Russia to re-assess its defense strategies and potentially divert resources from the frontline.
**Section 2: The International Response and Ongoing Diplomacy**
**Host:** The ambassadors of NATO and Ukraine are meeting amidst these escalating tensions. Dr. Petrova, what are the potential outcomes of these diplomatic efforts, and what role can the international community play in de-escalating the situation?
**Dr. Petrova:** The NATO-Ukraine meeting is crucial for demonstrating ongoing support for Ukraine while also exploring potential diplomatic avenues. However, achieving concrete outcomes might be challenging given the volatile situation. The international community must continue to condemn Russian aggression, provide Ukraine with necessary humanitarian and military aid, and encourage dialog to find a peaceful resolution.
**Host:** Mr. Ivanov, Russia has threatened a response to these attacks, potentially targeting Western countries supporting Ukraine. How do you view the possibility of this conflict expanding beyond the borders of Ukraine?
**Mr. Ivanov:** While the probability of a wider conflict is a serious concern, it’s important to analyze the potential costs and consequences for all parties involved.russia is aware that a direct confrontation with NATO carries substantial risks. However, the potential for miscalculations and unintended consequences remains a significant threat.
**Section 3: Examining the Future Trajectory of the Conflict**
**Host:** As the conflict enters its colder months, what are the factors that could influence the future trajectory of the war, Dr. Petrova?
**Dr. Petrova:** Beyond the military developments, several factors will be crucial in shaping the conflict’s trajectory. These include the economic situation in both countries, the level of ongoing domestic support for the war within Russia and Ukraine, and the potential for political solutions through negotiations facilitated by the international community.
**Host:** Mr. Ivanov, what are your predictions for the coming months?
**Mr. Ivanov:** This war is far from over. We can expect to see continued fighting and potentially more significant escalation. The outcome hinges on many factors, including the ability of both sides to withstand prolonged conflict, the level of international support, and the willingness to engage in meaningful dialog leading to a negotiated settlement.
**Host:** Thank you, Dr. Petrova and Mr. Ivanov, for providing your valuable insights into this complex and evolving situation.
This analysis provides a framework for an engaging and informative interview. Each section encourages a nuanced discussion, exploring different perspectives and prompting further reflection on the implications of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
