Moscow. China called on Russia and Ukraine to exercise restraint following the recent exchange of attacks between the sides that has raised fears of a more serious escalation in the conflict.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian stressed that China’s position on the conflict has always been clear. Beijing is in favor of resolving the crisis through political means and avoiding escalation
he added.
The German chancellor, Olaf Scholz, considered a scary climbing
Russia’s launch of the new intermediate-range ballistic missile in Ukraine, Oreshnikas well as the use of North Korean soldiers who mobilize on the front and die for Putin’s imperial dream
.
Scholz reiterated that Germany will not supply missiles Taurus long-range missiles to kyiv and will not give permission to use German weapons to destroy targets on Russian territory.
Germany and Japan expressed alarm at Ukraine’s decision to use American-made antipersonnel mines.
The spokesman for the German Foreign Ministry, Christian Wagner, regretted the decision, as it violates the Ottawa Treaty, which prohibits the production and use of these mines. It is regrettable that kyiv has decided to take this step and considers it as an advantage in the war
Wagner said.
Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya emphasized that this type of mine can cause great damage over a long period.
Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the start of serial production of the hypersonic missile Oreshnikafter it was tested and hit the Ukrainian city of Dnipro.
We have to start mass production. The decision has already been made
Putin declared, praising his particular strength and power
although he specified that It is not a means of mass destruction, but a precision weapon
in a televised meeting with senior military commanders.
The president added that Russia will continue testing the missile, in combat conditions
and emphasized that he does not have no doubt
that the United States understood
the warning.
In that sense, the vice president of the Russian Security Council, Dmitri Medvedev, stated that the new missile system will change the development of the Ukrainian conflict and clarified that Moscow had no contact with the current US administration after the test of its new missile.
Medvedev added that Russia could use nuclear weapons, although he considers them the last option
while Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova noted that a controversial US missile defense base in Poland is a potential target of the Russian military.
The Ukrainian president, Volodymir Zelensky, demanded that his allies deliver new anti-aircraft defense systems that can protect lives from new risks
.
US and European officials discussed a number of options that could deter Russia from taking more Ukrainian territory, including providing nuclear weapons to kyiv, the report said. The New York Times.
The head of the Pentagon, Lloyd Austin, reported that there are about 10,000 North Korean troops in the Russian border region of Kursk, partially taken over by Ukraine, who will enter soon in combat
.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Ukraine will hold emergency talks next Tuesday, the alliance said, following the escalation in the war that began almost 33 months ago. The conflict is entering a decisive phase
said Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk, and is taking on very dramatic dimensions
.
Meanwhile, kyiv acknowledged that Russian troops were advancing rapidly in the east of the country and the Ukrainian Parliament canceled a session scheduled for yesterday as the European nation increased security following the Russian attack on a military facility in the city of Dnipro. Russian air defense intercepted five US operational tactical missiles Atacms and two cruise missiles Storm Shadowmade in Britain, in a week, reported the Russian Ministry of Defense.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘
fbq(‘init’, ‘133913093805922’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Contact’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Donate’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘FindLocation’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Lead’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Search’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Subscribe’, {value: ‘0.00’, currency: ‘MXN’, predicted_ltv: ‘0.00’});
fbq(‘track’, ‘ViewContent’);
#China #calls #Russia #Ukraine #moderate #diplomatic #action
–
How might China’s economic ties to both Russia and Ukraine influence its ability to act as a mediator and effectively de-escalate the conflict?
## World Today Interviews: Escalation in Ukraine
Welcome to World Today Interviews. Today we’re discussing the recent escalation of the conflict in Ukraine, with two distinguished guests: Dr. Anya Petrov, a specialist in Russian foreign policy, and Mr. Mark Davies, a military analyst focused on the Eastern European region.
**(Introduction Music)**
**Host:** Dr. Petrov, let’s begin with China’s call for restraint. Beijing has consistently advocated for a diplomatic solution. How significant is this statement amidst the rising tensions, and what role can China realistically play in de-escalating the situation?
**Dr. Petrov:** China’s call is undoubtedly important, as it demonstrates their continued desire to maintain stability in the region. Beijing has significant economic ties with both Russia and Ukraine, and they are keen to avoid further disruption. However, their influence on Moscow’s actions is debatable. While China may encourage restraint, their ability to prevent Russia from pursuing its military objectives is limited.
**Host:** Mr. Davies, Russia’s deployment of the ‘Oreshnik’ hypersonic missile has understandably raised alarms in the West. How does this new weapon change the dynamic of the conflict? Do you see it as
a decisive game-changer, or a dangerous escalation that could potentially lead to a wider conflict?
**Mr. Davies:** The ‘Oreshnik’ is undoubtedly a significant development. It possesses both speed and maneuverability that make it difficult to intercept. This raises concerns about its potential use against NATO targets, particularly if the conflict expands. While it doesn’t necessarily guarantee military superiority for Russia, it undoubtedly forces NATO to reevaluate its defense strategies and potentially reconsider providing more advanced weaponry to Ukraine.
**(Transition Music)**
**Host:** We now move to the use of anti-personnel mines by Ukraine. Both Germany and Japan have expressed deep concern over this decision. Dr. Petrov, what are the implications of this move, both ethically and strategically?
**Dr. Petrov:** The use of anti-personnel mines is a highly controversial issue due to their indiscriminate nature and long-lasting impact on civilian populations. While Ukraine may justify this decision as a necessary measure to slow down Russia’s advance, the ethical implications are undeniable. It risks alienating international support and could have long-term consequences for the region’s stability.
**Host:** Mr. Davies, from a military perspective, how effective are these types of mines in a modern battlefield? While they can certainly cause casualties, wouldn’t a more targeted approach be strategically more advantageous?
**Mr. Davies:** Anti-personnel mines can certainly slow down an advancing force, but their effectiveness is debatable in a modern conflict where tactics have evolved. They are indiscriminate and can just as easily harm civilians or Ukrainian troops. A more targeted approach utilizing advanced weaponry and strategic positioning likely offers a greater tactical advantage.
**(Transition Music)**
**Host: ** The situation is undeniably complex, prompting discussions among Western nations regarding further support for Ukraine, even contemplating the provision of nuclear weapons.
Mr. Davies, what are the risks and benefits of supplying Ukraine with such powerful weaponry?
**Mr. Davies:** The potential risks of escalating the conflict to a nuclear level are immense and should not be overlooked. While providing Ukraine with such weaponry might deter Russian aggression, it also creates a dangerous precedent and could trigger an unpredictable chain reaction.
**Dr. Petrov:**
It’s crucial to remember that the introduction of nuclear weapons into the conflict dramatically increases the risk of global catastrophe. While frustrating, every effort should be made to find a diplomatic solution and avoid crossing this dangerous threshold.
**(Concluding Music)**
**Host:** This has been a truly illuminating discussion, highlighting the complexities and dangerous ramifications of the current situation.
Thank you to both Dr. Petrov and Mr. Davies for sharing their insights.
We, at World Today News, continue to cover this developing situation closely and provide you with the most accurate and up-to-date information.
