The singer of NOX, Szilvia Péter Szabó, reacted to the news about her, according to which she did not pay the work of the lighting technician Károly Vona who worked with her, as a result of which she accumulated a debt of almost HUF 30 million. According to the February order of the Capital Court, the performer was obliged to pay the lighting technician, but the debt has not been settled since then.
“The court awarded me more than HUF 25 million at the second instance. By the way, the singer didn’t even come to the sentencing, and she doesn’t communicate with me at all. No matter what I call him, he doesn’t respond. We talked roughly two years ago, if you think I’ve given up, you’re wrong,” Károly Vona said earlier.
The singer considers the allegations against her outrageous.
Because I’m a public figure, I’m not obliged to put up with that tsunami of lies, that discrediting campaign, and everything that he’s doing against me at the moment
said the singer, who believes that Károly Vona’s claims are untrue.
“He’s lying about me not paying anything because I do,” he said. He added that the repayment will be deducted from his salary and royalties, and that the case is about the sale and purchase of a property that does not even belong to him.
Regarding why she does not contact Károlly Vona, Szilvia Péter Szabó said that “I don’t communicate with her because she threatens me to such an extent that I am afraid of her, I was afraid of my family,” he quoted the Glance the singer.
Follow Index on Facebook too!
I’m following you!
Based on the information presented, what are the potential long-term ramifications for Szilvia Péter Szabó’s career, considering both the legal judgment against her and the public perception surrounding the dispute?
## World Today News Exclusive Interview: The Szilvia Péter Szabó Controversy
**Welcome to World Today News. Today, we delve into the recent controversy surrounding singer Szilvia Péter Szabó and lighting technician Károly Vona.**
Joining us today are **Ms. Anna Kovács**, a legal expert specializing in entertainment contracts, and **Mr. János Tóth**, a music industry analyst.
**Section 1: Unpaid Wages and Legal Recourse**
* **Host**: Ms. Kovács, a court ordered Szilvia Péter Szabó to pay nearly 30 million HUF (€78,000) to Mr. Vona for unpaid work. Can you explain the legal implications of such a ruling and the potential consequences of non-payment?
* **Host**: Mr. Tóth, how common are disputes like this in the music industry? What factors might contribute to such disagreements between artists and their crew members?
**Section 2: Conflicting Claims and Public Perception**
* **Host**: Szilvia Péter Szabó strongly denies Mr. Vona’s claims, stating she does pay and that the dispute involves property, not wages. How does this complicate the situation, Ms. Kovács?
* **Host**: Mr. Tóth, how does this public back-and-forth potentially impact both Szilvia Péter Szabó’s career and the image of the Hungarian music industry?
**Section 3: Communication Breakdown and Personal Safety Concerns**
* **Host**: Ms. Kovács, Szilvia Péter Szabó cites fear for herself and her family as a reason for not communicating with Mr. Vona. What legal options are available to someone who feels threatened in situations like this?
* **Host**: Mr. Tóth, how can the music industry promote healthier communication and better conflict resolution mechanisms to prevent situations like this from escalating?
**Section 4: Looking Ahead: Resolution and Accountability**
* **Host**: Ms. Kovács, what are the potential next steps in this legal battle? What outcome would be considered a fair resolution for both parties?
* **Host**: Mr. Tóth, what broader lessons can be learned from this case regarding professional conduct, financial transparency, and the importance of clear contractual agreements in the music industry?
**Closing**: Thank you to our guests for sharing their valuable insights. This case highlights the complexities that can arise in professional relationships, underscoring the need for open communication, fair treatment, and respect for all parties involved. We will continue to follow this story as it develops.
**Please note**: This interview script is intended as a guideline. The host may adjust questions and discussion flow based on the guests’ responses and the natural progression of the conversation.
