Kozlovsky started wrong.
The last stage of the Grand Prix of Russia in St. For the second time this season, the two strongest duos in the country met; previously, they only started competing head-to-head at the national championship.
The first round stayed Alexandra Boykova And Dmitry Kozlovsky. In the short program they did not make a single mistake, taking the lead. Anastasia Mishina And Alexander Gallyamov They made a small mistake – on the step sequence when a block was executed, the participants caught each other’s skates. This flaw cost them exactly the amount by which they fell behind their main rivals. Everything had to be decided in the free program.
Mishina and Gallyamov were the first to go on the ice. Obviously, they entered the season later than usual – or the summer tour was on the way Ilya Averbukhor the boys were not well with their health. One way or another, Anastasia and Alexander are getting in gradually. And the elements became more precise, and the exits were cleaner, and the speed of the skaters became stronger.
However, there is still something to be discovered: in particular, the participant can land the throws more smoothly and smoothly, and jump the row without under-rotating the snipe. But it turned out to be the strongest claim for gold. The cosmic points 157.55 could only be opposed with the same perfect performance. The gap after the short program is still small.
Alasdair Mysyakin, Spórs24
Boykova and Kozlovsky could not be mistaken – their competitors had raised the bar too high. And they seemed to start very well, with a magnificent parallel sequence of triple Salchow and two double Axels. Later, two sub-cycles will be noted on the element, but that’s not about that now.
Already from the second element, Dmitry began to scale with obvious pleasure, and errors began to fall. Step out with the skater on a parallel three-dimensional sheepskin coat, a loose rittberger that obviously did not succeed, from which Alexandra was not able to get out cleanly. Unexpected loss of difficulty levels in the todes – Kozlovsky in the middle of the element raised his partner a little higher than necessary. However, this is all small compared to the loss of support. Some 133.64 points and another lost start for Mishina and Gallyamov.
The coaching staff, despite the mistakes, greeted the players with a smile. It is difficult to understand what made the distinguished experts laugh – is it really the fourth gold of the competitors in a row in a duel?!
Evgeniy Semenov, Sports 24
Dmitry Kozlovsky said a lot of things after the short one, and thanks to him, but at the same time he praised his duet too much that he reached the bottom, literally a day later. A large proportion of fans also supported the theory.
“Today was very good, today was wow. All elements. It seems to me that it would be better not to make the leap. I think we had the best spin in international figure skating today.
The spread was amazing. Support – excellent, todes – very good, distribution – close, parallel. The track was played cleanly. They acted emotionally and hit the chords. I really enjoyed today’s performance.”– this is how Kozlovsky assessed himself on the first day.
After the free program, the skater’s rhetoric changed as expected. Although it is worth noting that he found the right words to talk to his partner.
“I failed, I didn’t get into a competitive mood at all, physically or mentally. Nothing worked during the rental. We have to praise Sasha – she pulled a couple, rolled. We have a very complex program – intense, without pauses, pauses, opportunities to breathe, and it only works when the elements are connected to music. It is only in this case that the performance turns out to be accidental, but we had a large number of failures that do not allow us to gain strength, energy and focus. That is why it is like this today.
It’s a shame that today we skated the worst of the season – we didn’t even skate like that in training. I did not succeed. In general, we can only note that Sasha was reliable today, I was happy with that, she stood her ground with dignity, but I, it seems, I have to change something in myself to approach on the Russian Championship in the best shape. “– explained Dmitry.
The gap between Boykova and Kozlovsky, of course, has been great. At the Panin-Kolomenkin monument, the loss was much smaller – but then there was a worthy argument in the form of an attempt at a quadruple throw. On the eve of the Russian Championship, the scales again went to Mishina and Gallyamov. Will the skaters be able to renew themselves in Omsk?
2024-11-24 16:10:00
#Tutberidzes #stars #coaches #laugh #failure #show #short #confirmed
How does the contrast between Boykova & Kozlovsky’s post-performance reactions – praising themselves after the short program and being self-critical after the free skate – illuminate their approach to competition and mental game?
This article describes a figure skating competition where Boykova & Kozlovsky performed well, while Mishina & Gallyamov struggled. It highlights the contrasting post-performance reactions of both duos.
Here’s a breakdown with open-ended, discussion-provoking questions:
**I. Performance Analysis:**
* **Boykova & Kozlovsky:**
* The article states they started strong but then made a few errors.
* Question: What factors might have led to the errors despite their strong start?
* Question: How common are “two sub-cycles” in figure skating, and what impact do they have on the judges’ scores?
* **Mishina & Gallyamov:**
* The article describes their performance as the “worst of the season”.
* Question: Considering the context of this competition, what might explain their struggles? Were there specific elements marked as particularly weak?
* Question: What does it mean for them to “not skate like that in training”? How might this impact their preparation for future events?
* **Overall:**
* Question: How important is mental preparation in figure skating, especially given Kozlovsky’s mention of his competitive mood?
* Question: How does the “gap” between the two pairs influence their respective strategies for upcoming competitions?
**II. Coach-Athlete Dynamics:**
* **Kozlovsky’s Post-Performance Comments:**
* Kozlovsky praised himself and his partner after the short program but was self-critical after the free skate.
* Question: To what extent does an off-performance inspire introspection in athletes like Kozlovsky?
* Question: How does Kozlovsky’s awareness of Sasha’s support play into their approach as a pair?
* **Coach’s Reaction:**
* The article mentions the coaching staff laughing despite errors.
* Question: What message do you think the coaches’ laughter sends to their athletes?
* Question: Can humor be a coping mechanism in a high-pressure environment like figure skating competitions?
**III. Future Prospects**
* **Preparation for the Russian Championship:**
* Kozlovsky aims to change something within himself to prepare for the Russian Championship.
* Question: What precautions should Mishina & Gallyamov take to avoid another setback at the upcoming championship?
* Question: Given the dynamic between the top contenders, how do you expect the competition at the Russian Championship to unfold?
**IV. Derivative Questions:**
* **Broader Context:** How does this competition fit within the larger figure skating landscape?
* **Sport and Media:** Does the media’s use of terms like “fourth gold in a row” influence public perception of the sport?
By exploring these open-ended questions, we can analyze this article’s depiction of figure skating beyond superficial results and delve into the athletes’ mental states, coaching strategies, and the broader complexities of this demanding sport.
