PAVIA, 23 NOV – Max Pezzali does not accept that the Municipality of Pavia awards civic merit to Mauro Repetto, his colleague in the 883 at the beginning of the nineties. The lawyers of the singer from Pavia – reported Il Giorno and the Province of Pavia – sent a letter to the mayor Michele Lissia and the council last November 6, asking not to award the civic recognition (which is assigned in a public ceremony on December 9, the day of San Siro, patron saint of Pavia) in Repetto.
The request is motivated by the fact that, according to the lawyers, the name of the 883 is identified with Pezzali. But there is also a lawsuit at stake, underway before the Court of Milan, with a company owned by Claudio Cecchetto who claims ownership of the band’s name.
The Municipality does not seem willing to back down. After the name of Repetto was indicated (together with that of 11 other candidates) during the conference of group leaders held on Thursday, the definitive approval should arrive on the evening of Monday 25 November in the city council.
No official replies were received from Mayor Lissia and from Palazzo Mezzabarba, headquarters of the municipal administration. However, it should be noted that Max Pezzali has already received the merit of San Siro. Furthermore, the decision to reward Repetto goes beyond his presence in the 883; the artist is credited with making the name of Pavia known around Italy with his theatrical show «In search of spiderman». Furthermore, in the proposal to award the prize to Repetto, presented by Pietro Alongi (majority councilor of the Democratic Party), no reference is ever made to the 883. (ANSA).
© All rights reserved
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘471476730149687’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
#Civic #merit #Pavia #Repetto #Max #Pezzali #sends #warning
–
What are the potential long-term ramifications of this case for future collaborations in the music industry, considering the legal precedents it establishes regarding ownership, intellectual property, and the recognition of individual contributions within a group?
## World Today News – Interview on the Pavia Civic Merit Controversy
Welcome to World Today News, where we delve into the stories shaping our world. Today, we’re discussing a fascinating case unfolding in Pavia, Italy, involving the awarding of civic merit and the complex legacy of a beloved musical duo.
Joining us are two esteemed guests:
* **Dr. Maria Rossi**, a legal expert specializing in copyright and intellectual property, will shed light on the legal intricacies surrounding the 883 name dispute.
* **Luca Bianchi**, a cultural commentator and music journalist, will provide insight into the broader implications of this controversy for the legacy of both Max Pezzali and Mauro Repetto.
**Part I: The Legal Landscape**
**Host:** Dr. Rossi, thank you for joining us. The article mentions a lawsuit regarding the ownership of the 883 name. Could you elaborate on the legal complexities involved in this case?
**Dr. Rossi:** Certainly. This case involves a complex interplay of intellectual property rights, specifically trademark rights and the right of publicity. Essentially, Claudio Cecchetto’s company is claiming ownership of the 883 name as a trademark, while Max Pezzali’s lawyers argue that the name is inextricably linked to his personal identity and artistic expression.
**Host:** This raises interesting questions about how artistic collaborations and band names are legally protected.
**Dr. Rossi:** Absolutely. The legal landscape surrounding band names is constantly evolving, particularly in the digital age where branding and recognition are paramount.
**Part II: The Civic Merit Debate**
**Host:** Mr. Bianchi, the article highlights the local debate concerning the awarding of civic merit to Mauro Repetto. What are some of the key arguments being made for and against this decision?
**Luca Bianchi:** This situation presents a fascinating clash of perspectives. On one hand, supporters of Repetto’s recognition argue that he deserves to be honored for his contributions to Pavia’s cultural landscape, particularly through his acclaimed theatrical work “In Search of Spiderman.” They also point out that Max Pezzali has already received this same honour.
On the other side, Pezzali’s team argues that awarding Repetto this civic merit essentially equates the 883 name with him, overlooking Pezzali’s centrality to the band’s identity.
**Host:** This controversy seemingly hinges on public perception and how the 883 legacy is understood.
**Luca Bianchi:** Precisely. The ongoing legal battle over the band’s name adds another layer of complexity to this debate.
**Part III: Broader Implications**
**Host:** Dr. Rossi, how might this case influence future disputes regarding the ownership and recognition of artists’ work, particularly within groups?
**Dr. Rossi:** This case sets a precedent that could have far-reaching consequences for collaborative artistic projects. It underscores the importance of clearly defining ownership and rights from the outset, particularly when commercial interests are involved.
**Host:** Mr. Bianchi, what are your thoughts on the potential impact on the legacy of both Pezzali and Repetto?
**Luca Bianchi:** This situation is certainly a test for both individuals. How they navigate these challenges will likely shape public perception of their respective contributions to the 883 legacy for years to come.
**Host:** Thank you both for sharing your valuable insights. This is a complex and evolving story with significant legal and cultural ramifications. World Today News will continue to track developments and provide informed analysis on this fascinating case.
