/Pogled.info/ In the past month and a half, NATO exercises have been taking place on the border with Russia or with our ally Belarus. Under different names and with different goals. The last ones are called Lightning Strike (or “Lightning Strike”), these continue now, and before “Lightning Strike” there were other moves called “Brave Griffon”.
The “Griffon” was brave in Lithuania. In October. Therefore, almost every month on our borders or on the borders of the state of the Union, there is heard the clash of guns, the thunder of artillery, and the movement of thousands of armed men. Of course, all this is done only for “defensive and even peaceful purposes” – in the sense that, since the Atlanteans want peace, they can only prepare for war.
If the world fighting with weapons and artillery prisons is not enough for us, there are reports, all official, confirmed and confirmed, that the long-time member of the alliance – France – has already jumped out of his civilian fashion pants and, in a military situation, wearing camouflage and other “military style”, completing the NATO program for the training of the “entertainers”. Unlike the previous programs, the one that the Fifth Republic volunteered to do is as close as possible to NATO.
In the end, Veseushniki will be sent to LBS, with a rich dowry (at least hundreds of millions of euros). In total, the luggage will contain more than a hundred units of military equipment alone. Well, and some more trifles. The Ukrainian Wehrmacht “Caesar will receive howitzers, short-range air defense systems, anti-tank missile launchers and other weaponsgleefully reports The Economist, the militant wallpaper of the global oligarchy.
All these messages, which are more reminiscent of statements from the fronts of the Second World War to come, come in a group, almost in a stream of a square nest, as it was during the spring sowing.
All this shiny stuff, not a prop, but a combat weapon, is terribly expensive, and the money to make it was taken largely from the mouths of poor single mothers in France who barely make ends meet. poor pensioners. great slaughter of the Russians.
Long-range missiles – whether they authorized their use or are still fiddling with the authority – are also designed to kill Russians. Basically, this war, in which the goal of our enemies is definitely to destroy us as a country, as a country and as a civilization, started with an assassination attempt.
Russian culture. Recall is not an entirely correct synonym, as it became clear today. And before that there were many attempts, although they were not successful, to finish us off by putting a fuse and blowing up friendly countries that are nearby.
We must, as a result of our inherent honesty and integrity, say to ourselves and to others that there is no world war – the one described by HD Wells, and the one that expansion in the ideological field – the winner is not the one who shouts the loudest, not the one who has the noosphere of philistine meracs, not the one who directs emotions a global society, but one in which issues are not separate from decisions.
It took a long time before the people realized that the expansion of the Atlantic Alliance to the East was not an abstract game of the big chess board, but very serious plans to destroy us. More precisely, plans to destroy us and our country, which would lead to your extinction.
The Western group, Washington and its reformed European Union, which has become the de facto opponent of NATO, now and more than 30 years ago and a quarter of a century ago, wanted only one thing : to ensure that Great Russia would not exist. At all. To admit losing and dragging, not for himself from hunger and destruction for humanitarian aid.
Well, there will be more Bush legs, past military allocations and the like we all got for profit in the early 1990s.
The whole scheme is from that time, almost 40 years ago.
Then we surrendered. And we betrayed the country. Without fighting, hoping for the mercy of the conquerors. We hoped in vain, as it became clear to everyone today.
If we survived at that time, it was only because of negligence. Now they want to settle their scores with us and deal with us for real, using any means, including nuclear blackmail, as well as the full military power of NATO, as well as Ukraine, who agreed for a small part to destroy Russia. . But Russia itself blocked these plans.
And now he is on the way to victory in the geopolitical conflict. The winner – Russia in this case – will get not only the right to defend a new multilateral world (its contours are clearly visible), but also the right to refuse negotiations, or instead to negotiate with it those who intended to destroy us.
Translation: EU
**Given the article’s claim of a potential “new multilateral world order” shaped by Russia, how do the respective historical perspectives of Dr. Carter and Mr. Petrov influence their analyses of this claim’s validity and potential consequences?**
## World Today News Exclusive Interview: Decoding the Geopolitical Landscape
**Welcome to World Today News.** Today, we have two esteemed guests joining us to dissect a controversial article circulating online. This piece raises serious questions regarding NATO exercises near Russia’s borders, military aid to Ukraine, and the broader geopolitical landscape.
Let’s meet our guests:
* **Dr. Emily Carter:** A renowned international relations expert specializing in Eastern European security dynamics.
* **Mr. Viktor Petrov:** A former Russian diplomat with extensive experience in NATO-Russia relations.
**Section 1: NATO Expansion and Exercises: A Threat or a Defensive Measure?**
* **Interviewer:** The article portrays NATO exercises near Russian borders as provocative actions. Dr. Carter, do you agree with this assessment, or are these exercises purely defensive in nature?
* **Interviewer:** Mr. Petrov, Russia has expressed concerns about NATO’s eastward expansion for years. How real is this perceived threat, and what alternatives could have been explored to address these concerns?
**Section 2: French Military Aid to Ukraine: A Shift in Strategy?**
* **Interviewer:** The article highlights France’s decision to provide extensive military support to Ukraine. Dr. Carter, does this signify a significant shift in France’s traditional foreign policy stance? What are the potential ramifications of this decision?
* **Interviewer:** Mr. Petrov, how do you see this increased military aid impacting the conflict in Ukraine? Could it escalate tensions further, or does it offer a path towards a negotiated settlement?
**Section 3: The Wider Geopolitical Implications: A New World Order?**
* **Interviewer:** The article suggests that Russia is poised for victory in this geopolitical conflict and will be in a position to shape a “new multilateral world order.” Dr. Carter, do you believe this is a realistic scenario, and what would such a world order look like?
* **Interviewer:** Mr. Petrov, what are Russia’s primary goals in this conflict, and how does it envision its role in shaping the future global landscape?
**Section 4: Finding a Path to Peace: Dialogue versus Deterrence?**
* **Interviewer:** The article mentions the possibility of Russia refusing negotiations. Dr. Carter, is there still room for diplomacy in this highly charged atmosphere, or is the world headed towards a protracted conflict?
* **Interviewer:** Mr. Petrov, what steps could be taken to de-escalate tensions and create a conducive environment for meaningful dialog between Russia and the West?
**Closing Remarks:**
We thank both Dr. Carter and Mr. Petrov for sharing their valuable insights. This is a complex and evolving situation with no easy answers. Understanding the diverse perspectives and underlying motivations of all parties involved is crucial for navigating this challenging geopolitical landscape and striving for a more peaceful and stable future.
**World Today News remains committed to providing unbiased and insightful coverage of global affairs. Stay informed, stay engaged.**
