Another high-ranking member of the Iranian regime was found to be living in Canada, bringing the number to 16, according to immigration officials.
that canada border services He also said he had sent one more person, believed to be a government official, to the Immigration and Refugee Commission to investigate. exile hearing.
In addition to the two cases in which deportation orders have already been issued, seven deportation hearings are currently underway for people suspected of being high-ranking members of the Iranian regime.
Updated figures are as of October 15.
The Canadian government would not identify members of the junta whose cases are still ongoing.
“As a matter of practice, the IRB does not provide information on any case that has not been made public,” the Refugee Council said in a statement to Global News.
Story continues below advertisement
This incident is a result of a policy adopted in November 2022 that banned senior Iranian government officials from entering Canada.
Measures were taken following death. Martha AminiHe was detained and killed by Iran‘s morality police for showing his hair in public.
A woman holds an image of Martha Amini, who died in police custody in Iran during protests in Bucharest, Romania, on October 1, 2022.
Vadim Girda/AP
The killing sparked protests that were brutally suppressed by the clerical regime led by Supreme Leader Ali Khomenei.
Get local breaking news
For news affecting Canada and around the world, sign up to have breaking news alerts delivered straight to you as they happen.
Canada responded by designating the Iranian government as a regime engaged in “terrorism and systematic and serious violations of human rights.”
This policy effectively banned tens of thousands of Iranian officials and members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps from entering Canada.
The Iranian regime and the IRGC are leading the so-called ‘Axis of Resistance’ that has been fomenting violence and instability in the Middle East.
Story continues below advertisement
Iran is a major backer of Hamas, which launched an attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, sparking regional conflict. Tehran also supported Hezbollah and Yemen’s Houthi rebels.
The Islamic Republic has also been implicated in several recent plots to assassinate dissidents and critics, including former Liberal Party lawmaker Irwin Cotler.
Global News revealed that deportation orders were issued this year for two civil servants, Majid Iranmanesh and Sayed Salman Samani.
But so far only one of them has actually been expelled, and the rest of the cases have been held in secret since the IRB banned the media from attending hearings.
Majid Iranmanesh (left) and Sayed Salman Samani were ordered deported because they were high-ranking members of the Iranian regime.
Trending Now
-
Trump nominates Pam Bondi for U.S. attorney general after Matt Gaetz resigns
-
‘GST holiday’ for all, $250 checks for some: What Ottawa is promising
Meanwhile, an Iranian citizen found guilty of helping Tehran evade sanctions appeared before the IRB on Wednesday to face deportation proceedings.
Amin Usepi JamAlso known as Amen Cohen, he was convicted in the United States of transporting sensitive material to Iran in violation of sanctions.
Story continues below advertisement
The CBSA is seeking to expel him, claiming he has undermined Canada’s efforts to curb the threat from the Iranian regime.
Deportation proceedings were scheduled to begin on October 28, but the case was delayed when lawyers resigned, citing a “breakdown” in the lawyer-client relationship.
The IRB, which appeared this week, postponed the hearing again until February 25 to give Yousefijam’s new attorney time to prepare.
Arash (left) and Amin Yousefijam (also known as Aurash and Ameen Cohen).
Yousefijam “contributed to increasing security threats to Canada related to terrorism and nuclear weapons attacks,” the CBSA wrote in its report.
his younger brother Arash Usefi Jam Also found guilty. The brothers used Ontario’s name change system and adopted new identities as Dr. Ameen and Arash Cohen.
The Ontario government said it was investigating. reform This policy is intended to prevent serious criminals from hiding their past identities.
Story continues below advertisement
More about Canada
more videos
**How might Canada’s policy of deporting Iranian officials residing in Canada impact the country’s relationship with Iran, considering the potential for increased tension or retaliation?**
Here is a possible interview structure with open-ended questions based on the article, aimed at encouraging discussion and exploring diverse perspectives:
**Introduction**
* **Moderator:** Welcome to today’s discussion on the recent developments concerning Iranian officials living in Canada. We have two distinguished guests with us today who will shed light on this complex issue. [Introduce guests and their expertise].
**Section 1: The Policy and its Implications**
* **Moderator:** The article highlights that Canada has been deporting high-ranking members of the Iranian regime. Can you explain the policy behind this and what prompted its implementation?
* **Guest 1 (expert on Canadian immigration policy):** Discuss the legal basis of the policy, its goals, and how it aligns with Canada’s broader foreign policy objectives.
* **Guest 2 (expert on Iranian affairs):** Provide context on the political climate in Iran, the nature of the Iranian regime, and the potential impact of Canada’s policy.
* **Moderator:** How effective do you think this policy is in addressing human rights concerns and security threats?
* **Guest 1: ** Analyze the practical implications of the policy in terms of enforcement, legal challenges, and potential unintended consequences.
* **Guest 2:** Offer insights into the Iranian government’s response to this policy and its potential impact on relations between Canada and Iran.
**Section 2: The Case Studies**
* **Moderator:** The article mentions specific cases of deportation orders. What can you tell us about these individuals and their alleged roles in the Iranian regime?
* **Guest 1:** Explain the process of identifying and deporting individuals under this policy. Address questions of due process and the right to a fair hearing.
* **Guest 2:** Provide historical context on the individuals mentioned, their potential ties to human rights violations, and the significance of their presence in Canada.
* **Moderator:** The article also touches upon a case involving an Iranian citizen convicted of helping Iran evade sanctions. How does this case relate to the broader issue of Iranian officials living in Canada?
* **Guest 1:** Discuss the connection between sanctions evasion and national security threats, and how Canada addresses these issues.
* **Guest 2:** Explore the broader context of Iran’s economic activities and its alleged attempts to circumvent international sanctions.
**Section 3: Broader Concerns and Ethical Dilemmas**
* **Moderator:** What are your thoughts on the ethical implications of allowing individuals connected to oppressive regimes to reside in Canada?
* **Guest 1:** Discuss the balance between upholding human rights and protecting national security.
* **Guest 2:** Offer perspectives on the impact of this policy on Iranian communities in Canada, and the potential for discrimination or prejudice.
* **Moderator:** What are some potential solutions or alternative approaches to addressing these complex challenges?
* **Guest 1:** Suggest potential legal and policy reforms that could balance competing interests.
* **Guest 2:** Discuss the role of diplomacy, international cooperation, and civil society in promoting human rights in Iran and holding its government accountable.
**Conclusion**
* **Moderator:** Thank you both for your insightful contributions to this important discussion. Looking ahead, what do you see as the most pressing concerns and potential avenues for progress on this issue?
**Ending Note:**
This interview structure provides a starting point for a nuanced and informed discussion about a complex issue. The open-ended questions encourage guests to explore different perspectives, analyze the policy’s implications, and consider potential solutions. Remember to encourage healthy debate and respectful dialog.
