/ world today news/ Ralitsa Ruseva’s comment on “Novinar”
If such a tax is indeed introduced, there should rightly be protests. Even for drinking the invigorating caffeinated beverage, they will ask us for money. However, coffee sellers have to pay. They also have to report their turnover, as are obliged to do the sellers of bread, milk, etc. n. However, the owners of coffee machines jumped against the NRA’s requirement to have fiscal devices. They protest that their turnover would decrease. They also predict an increase in the price of the warm refreshing drink by up to 60 percent.
This means that their obligation to pay taxes like all their other fellows will actually hit the consumer’s pocket. And the coffee will no longer be sweet or bitter, but salty. How much are these traders currently earning? Now they don’t issue receipts. Why should they work in the dark, while their colleagues in supermarkets, for example, give a fiscal receipt and pay taxes. Will machine coffee become more expensive when the receipt requirement comes into effect? Then I won’t drink it from a vending machine, I’ll buy it from the store. So will the caffeine aficionado. Because it will be cheaper for him. And the receipt will not make the drink more expensive.
And in addition to the fiscal receipt, he can also receive a lucky ticket – for health, success or some wise thought. It is a separate issue that, in most cases, coffee prepared in a store is tastier than the liquid that the machines dispense. At least that’s what connoisseurs of the drink say. If they increase the price of coffee from the street machines, their owners risk having no customers at all. Because the aromatic caffeinated drink in the pastry shop will cost less and taste better.
#Coffee #Tax #View #Info
**What are the potential long-term consequences of a price increase on vending machine coffee, and how might this impact consumer behavior and the overall coffee market in Bulgaria?**
## Brewing Debate: A Conversation on Coffee Taxes and Fiscalization
**Host:** Welcome to World Today News, where we delve into the issues shaping our world. Today, we’re discussing a topic close to many hearts – or rather, mugs – the potential introduction of a tax on coffee sold from vending machines. Joining us are Ralitsa Ruseva, a financial commentator known for her critical analysis, and Stefan Ivanov, a representative of the Bulgarian Coffee Vending Association. Welcome to both of you.
**Ralitsa Ruseva:** Thank you for having me.
**Stefan Ivanov:** It’s great to be here.
**Host:** Ralitsa, your recent commentary on “Novinar” triggered a significant response. You argue that introducing a tax on vending machine coffee is unfair and will ultimately harm consumers. Can you elaborate on your reasoning?
**Ralitsa Ruseva:** Certainly. My main point is that coffee vending machine owners currently operate largely outside the formal tax system. They don’t issue receipts, so we have no transparency about their earnings.
This lack of accountability allows them to undercut traditional cafes and bakeries who are obliged to pay their dues. Introducing a tax on vending machine coffee simply formalizes their participation in the tax system, placing them on an even playing field with other businesses.
**Host:** Stefan, your organization represents the interests of coffee vending machine owners. What is your perspective on the potential introduction of this tax?
**Stefan Ivanov:** We understand the need for everyone to contribute their fair share. However, we are concerned about the impact this tax will have on our businesses and consumers. Many vending machine operators are small, independent businesses struggling to survive in a competitive market.
A tax, coupled with the mandatory use of fiscal devices, will increase our operational costs significantly. This will inevitably lead to price increases for consumers, potentially making vending machine coffee unaffordable for many.
**Host:**
Let’s delve deeper into the impact on consumers. Ralitsa, you mention that consumers might shift to purchasing coffee from cafes and bakeries if vending machine prices increase.
**Ralitsa Ruseva:** Exactly. Consumers are price-sensitive, and the convenience of vending machines should not excuse unfair pricing practices.
Cafes and bakeries already offer a higher quality product in a more social setting. If vending machine coffee becomes too expensive, consumers will naturally gravitate towards these alternatives.
**Host:** Stefan, how do you respond to this argument? Will consumers be willing to pay more for the convenience of vending machines? **Stefan Ivanov:** Accessibility and affordability are key factors for our customers. Many rely on vending machines for their daily caffeine fix, especially in workplaces and public areas.
While we acknowledge the appeal of cafes, they are not always conveniently located or within everyone’s budget. A significant price hike could indeed drive some customers away, but it would disproportionately affect lower-income individuals who rely on vending machines for affordable coffee.
**Host:** This raises an important point about societal equity.
Ralitsa, is there a way to strike a balance between fiscal responsibility and ensuring affordability for all consumers?
**Ralitsa Ruseva:**
It’s a complex issue. Perhaps a tiered system could be implemented, with lower taxes applied to vending machines operating in lower-income areas.
This would ensure a reasonable level of taxation while minimizing the impact on vulnerable populations. Additionally, the government could explore providing subsidies or incentives to vending machine owners who commit to using sustainable practices and offering fair pricing.
**Host:** Stefan, what are your thoughts on implementing such measures?
**Stefan Ivanov:** We are open to discussing solutions that are both fair and sustainable.
Ultimately, our goal is to ensure the continued viability of our businesses while providing affordable coffee to our customers. We believe a collaborative approach involving the government, vending machine operators, and consumer representatives is crucial to finding a win-win solution.
**Host:**
It’s clear that this is a multifaceted issue with no easy answers.
We appreciate both of your insightful perspectives on this important discussion.
Thank you, Ralitsa and Stefan, for joining us today.
**Ralitsa Ruseva:**
Thank you for having me.
**Stefan Ivanov:**
It was a pleasure to be here.