/ world today news/ London, together with the “Challenger-2” tanks, will transfer shells with depleted uranium to Kiev, announced the British Deputy Minister of Defense Annabelle Goldie. How was this perceived in Russia, and how might the decision of the British authorities turn out?
“To the Last Ukrainian”
Moscow will react if the Armed Forces use weapons with a nuclear component, Vladimir Putin warned. “It seems that the West has really decided to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian, not in words, but in deeds,” he said.
The Ministry of Defense called Britain’s decision another step towards an escalation of the conflict.
And Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov pointed out that London has lost all direction in its efforts to undermine strategic stability. “If this is true, then they are prepared not just to take risks, but to violate international humanitarian law, as they did in 1999. in Yugoslavia, and many other things that they indulge in, including war crimes, crimes against humanity,” he explained.
The Pentagon hastened to assure that they would not transfer such ammunition to Kyiv.
„Part of the Anglo-Saxon strategy’
The spokesperson of the Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, commented on the situation in more detail. The delivery of uranium-core projectiles will bring the confrontation to a new round, she is convinced.
This is not just some new form of aid to Kiev, but weapons with a nuclear component. Such manipulations are “part of the Anglo-Saxon strategy”, Zakharova recalled. Thus, weapons of mass destruction served as a pretext for the invasion of Iraq, even though all the accusations against Baghdad turned out to be lies.
“In general, the use of depleted uranium projectiles is a manifestation of genocide against the population against which they are used and the population that uses them,” the foreign ministry spokeswoman said. “That is, everyone who lives in this territory receives the corresponding dose of radiation, and this is not a one-time problem. They will always live with it, and first of all those who used it,” she adds.
The adopted decision puts an end to the West’s attempts to show concern for Ukraine. They need the Kiev regime only to oppose Russia. And the fate of the local population does not bother Washington and London at all.
“Not only those against whom these weapons are currently being used will suffer, but also the future generations who will live on these lands,” emphasized the representative of the diplomatic department.
Effective and economical
All uranium-core projectiles are under-calibrated: the diameter of the warhead is much smaller than that of the ammunition itself. They are used to destroy heavy armored vehicles.
Depleted uranium has a very high armor penetration rate. Another feature is the high pyrophoricity: the small particles of the core ignite easily.
This component is a by-product of nuclear weapons production. Therefore, for countries with such technologies, such projectiles are cheap.
The use of uranium in ammunition was even considered in Nazi Germany. Armaments Minister Albert Speer signs the corresponding order when difficulties arise with the purchase of tungsten in Portugal. Half a century later, NATO countries are taking it up.
Monster results
The Americans used such munitions during the Persian Gulf War, during the bombing of Yugoslavia and the invasion of Iraq.
Uranium is used to make bombs, rockets, artillery shells, tank shells and even aircraft cannons mounted on attack aircraft.
Those against whom these weapons are used face catastrophic consequences. There is a surge in oncological diseases in Serbia. Where they are bombarded most intensively, each year one percent of the population dies of cancer, mostly men aged 35-50.
Former members of the Yugoslav army also suffer – more than thirty thousand cases in the last ten years. They mainly diagnose leukemia and brain tumor. According to Maria Zakharova, in 2016 alone, 22,000 people died in Serbia as a result of the uranium bombing. This is called “Balkan syndrome”.
The UN Special Commission in 2003 saw nothing of the sort. However, she mentioned in the report about “long-term effects” that can be assessed after 15-20 years.
This untied the hands of the Americans in the Iraq campaign. With the same sad result. Suad Al-Azawi, PhD in geoenvironmental engineering from the Colorado School of Mines, said the use of depleted uranium and white phosphorus leads to a sixfold increase in the number of cancers.
US allies also suffered. In the mid-2000s, 500 Italian soldiers sued. They claimed that they all had the same symptoms – exactly the same as colleagues from the Czech Republic, Greece, Spain and Belgium.
In 2011 the command of the Italian army was found guilty. The court concluded: “Knowing the risks, they did not take measures to eliminate the threat.” According to lawyer Angelo Fiore Tartaglia, about 7,600 Italian soldiers were poisoned with depleted uranium. Several hundred have died.
Now the report of the UN commission is facing more and more criticism – the numbers speak for themselves. Depleted uranium projectiles in Ukraine are therefore dangerous for both sides in the conflict. As Maria Zakharova said: “Radiation does not ask whose Crimea it is. It affects everyone.”
Translation: V. Sergeev
Vote with ballot No. 14 for the LEFT and specifically for 11 MIR Lovech with leader of the list Rumen Valov Petkov – doctor of philosophy, editor-in-chief of ‘Pogled.Info’ and in 25 MIR-Sofia with preferential No. 105. Tell your friends in Lovech and Sofia who to support!?
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel or in Telegram:
#jokes #Russia #respond #Kyivs #supply #uranium #projectiles
Here are two PAA (Potential Audience Actions) related questions for the “World Today News Interview: The Impact of Depleted Uranium Projectiles”:
## World Today News Interview: The Impact of Depleted Uranium Projectiles
**Introduction:**
Welcome to World Today News. Today we are discussing a recent announcement by the British government to supply depleted uranium projectiles to Ukraine, alongside Challenger-2 tanks. This decision has sparked controversy and strong reactions from Russia. Joining us today are [Guest 1 Name], an international relations expert specializing in conflict resolution, and [Guest 2 Name], a military analyst with expertise in the history and implications of depleted uranium weaponry.
**Section 1: Escalation of Conflict & International Law**
* **Host:** The British government has stated this is a measure to support Ukraine’s defense. However, Russia has strongly condemned the move, warning of dire consequences. [Guest 1], how do you see this supply of depleted uranium projectiles impacting the already tense situation in Ukraine? Does this cross a line in terms of international law and humanitarian concerns?
* **Host:** [Guest 2], your expertise lies in military weaponry. Can you help us understand the specific capabilities and tactical advantage of depleted uranium projectiles? Does their use signify a significant escalation in the type of warfare being waged in Ukraine?
**Section 2: Health and Environmental Concerns**
* **Host:** The article cites concerns about the long-term health effects of depleted uranium, particularly referencing the use of this weapon in previous conflicts like the Gulf War and in Yugoslavia. [Guest 1], how credible are these concerns, and what lasting impacts could be felt by the Ukrainian population and the environment?
* **Host:** [Guest 2], from a military standpoint, how do you weigh the potential tactical benefits of depleted uranium projectiles against the potential risks to civilian populations and the environment? Should these risks be a decisive factor in the decision to deploy this type of weaponry?
**Section 3: Global Power Dynamics & Future Implications**
* **Host:** The article suggests that this move by Britain could be part of a larger “Anglo-Saxon strategy.” [Guest 1], what broader geopolitical implications might this decision have, especially considering Russia’s response and stance on expanding NATO?
* **Host:** [Guest 2], what lessons can be learned from the historical use of depleted uranium weaponry in other conflicts? What does this situation tell us about the evolving nature of warfare and the ethical dilemmas faced by nations in shaping their military strategies?
**Conclusion:**
* **Host:** This is a complex and multifaceted issue with far-reaching consequences. Thank you, [Guest 1] and [Guest 2], for sharing your valuable insights. We hope this discussion has shed some light on this critical topic.
**Note:**
* Remember to introduce the guests briefly, mentioning their credentials and expertise relevant to the discussion.
* Encourage a balanced and respectful dialog, allowing both guests ample opportunity to share their perspectives.
* Facilitate a thoughtful conversation that explores multifaceted aspects of the issue, inviting viewers to consider different angles.