Home » Business » Moody’s assessment is biased; work is being done to bring investment: Sheinbaum

Moody’s assessment is biased; work is being done to bring investment: Sheinbaum

Mexico City. Claudia Sheinbaum, president of Mexico, considered that the economic evaluation carried out by the securities rating agencies of our country has an “original bias”, since since 2018 the economic model of our country has changed, and I am sending a message to investors to clarify that This administration works in an important way to attract capital.

Yesterday the Moody’s agency changed Mexico’s outlook from “stable” to “negative”, arguing that it observes a “weakening of the institutional and policy-making framework that could undermine fiscal and economic results.” This adjustment in the outlook does not modify the country’s rating or remove its investment grade.

In this regard, the head of the Executive expressed: “I don’t know why there is supposedly an institutional weakening, they would have to give more arguments and evidence for it.

“Many times these rating agencies are oriented to evaluate based on an economic model, it is how they were built beyond criticizing a rating agency, that is the model with which they rate, and we all know that as of 2018 the economic model in our country changed, it is a model based on republican austerity, moral economy, on reorienting the budget for social programs, for rights and public investment.

“Many times these evaluations have this original bias, so we would have to ask why do they think there is an institutional weakening? In any case, the rating does not change,” he said in his morning conference.

Moody’s change in the country’s outlook came one day before the new government presented its first economic package.

Sheinbaum took the opportunity to send a message to all investors: “We are doing very important work with the entire economic cabinet, there are many investments for Mexico in 2025, there is an investment portfolio, we are working with Mexican and United States businessmen and businesswomen. particularly to continue increasing investments in our country.

“Investments should not only increase the number, but also well-being for Mexicans.”

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,

fbq(‘init’, ‘133913093805922’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Contact’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Donate’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘FindLocation’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Lead’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Search’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Subscribe’, {value: ‘0.00’, currency: ‘MXN’, predicted_ltv: ‘0.00’});
fbq(‘track’, ‘ViewContent’);

#Moodys #assessment #biased #work #bring #investment #Sheinbaum

**How might the perceived “weakening institutional and policy-making⁤ framework” identified ​by Moody’s impact foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows to Mexico and which sectors might be most⁢ affected?**

## Interview: Assessing Mexico’s Economic Outlook

**Intro**: Welcome to World Today News, where we delve⁣ into the latest global events⁤ with insightful ⁣analysis.

Today, we’re discussing Moody’s recent decision to revise Mexico’s economic outlook to ⁤”negative,” a move generating discussion and debate within the country. Joining us to ⁤unpack this development are renowned economist [Guest 1 Name & Expertise] and political analyst [Guest 2 Name & Expertise].

**Section 1: Moody’s Assessment and Its Implications**

* **Host**: Moody’s cited concerns about “weakening institutional and policy-making framework” as the basis for their outlook change. [Guest 1], can you elaborate on what factors might contribute to such a perception, and⁣ what are the‌ potential economic repercussions of a “negative” outlook?

* **Host**: [Guest 2], how do you interpret Moody’s decision in the⁣ context of the current political ​landscape in Mexico?​ Could this be perceived as a lack of confidence in the government’s economic policies, and what are the potential ⁤political ramifications?

**Section 2: The Mexican Government’s Response**

* **Host**:⁣ President Sheinbaum stated that ⁤she believes rating agencies have an “original bias”​ and‍ are evaluating Mexico based on an outdated economic model. [Guest 1], how valid do you find this argument, and ‍how might the changing economic landscape​ in Mexico influence the effectiveness of traditional rating models?

* ‍**Host**: [Guest 2], President Sheinbaum also emphasized the ​government’s efforts to attract ⁢investment. How do you see this playing out in light of Moody’s revised outlook? Will investors be deterred, or could this potentially strengthen the government’s resolve to prove the agency wrong?

**Section 3: Future Outlook and ‍Investment Climate**

* **Host**: Looking ahead,​ what are the key⁣ challenges and opportunities facing Mexico’s economy over the next year? [Guest 1], what specific areas do you think require the government’s‌ attention, and what steps could be taken ⁣to steer the country towards a more robust and sustainable economic future?

* **Host**: [Guest 2], how do you‍ envision​ this situation impacting Mexico’s international relations? Will this affect its standing within trade‌ blocs ​or with international investors?

**Closing**: Thank you‌ both for sharing your invaluable insights on this significant ⁢development. We hope⁣ this discussion has illuminated the complexities surrounding Mexico’s economic outlook and ​provided our viewers​ with a deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. For more ‍in-depth analysis, please visit our‌ website, world-today-news.com.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.