The ND Ethics Committee had to meet at a specific time to remove former Prime Minister Antonis Samaras. Both the day (Tuesday) and the time (6pm) were set. However, a member of the Commission, Thodoros Karaoglou, was absent in Argentina. They informed him, however, that he must come urgently to Athens.
And since, as BIMAtodotis writes, in the ND they did not know if Karaoglou would manage to come and be at the Commission on time, they decided to replace him with… a minister. The Minister of Rural Development, Kostas Tsiaras. But Karaoglou raced and managed to reach Athens in time.
And now what do we do? Perhaps the members of the Commission thought. Do we tell the minister not to come? At that time, the President of the Committee, Yannis Tragakis, receives a phone call from another member of the Committee, Thanasis Davakis, who states that he is unable to attend. No, the member of parliament for Laconia was not absent abroad, nor did he have any health problems, he simply did not want to participate in the removal of Antonis Samaras, who when he was Prime Minister honored him with the position of Deputy Minister of Defense. That’s how Tsiaras stayed.
the “coincidence”
The following day, BIMAtodotis writes, the Ethics Committee’s decision to delete Samaras had to be read in the Plenary Session of the Parliament. But by whom? From the Speaker of the Parliament, Kostas Tasoula? Mr. Tasoulas is considered the most supportive of the late Averof, just as Antonis Samaras was also Averofikos.
Therefore, it would be somewhat unseemly for an Aberofian to announce the deletion of another Aberofian. The solution was found. The decision would be read by one of the vice-presidents of the Parliament, Giorgos Georgantas. As it happened. But few remembered that Mr. Georgantas is from Kilkis. Well, what do you say? Sympilidis was also from Kilkis who, with his departure, brought down the government of Konstantinos Mitsotakis.
#Deletion #Samara #Absence #coincidences
**Premise:** The article details last-minute changes and replacements within the Ethics Committee prior to Antonis Samaras’s removal. **Assertion:** These changes suggest a deliberate effort to manipulate the outcome of the meeting. **Question:** What evidence, beyond the timing of the changes, supports the assertion that these replacements were intended to predetermine the decision against Samaras?
## World Today News - Exclusive Interview: Behind the Deletion of Antonis Samaras
Welcome back to World Today News. Today, we delve into the controversial removal of former Prime Minister Antonis Samaras from a prominent position within the New Democracy party. To shed light on this Byzantine process, we have two distinguished guests: **Professor Elena Papadopoulos**, a renowned political analyst, and **Dimitris Vasiliou**, a seasoned political journalist known for his in-depth coverage of Greek politics.
**Part 1: The Ethics Committee Saga**
**Host:** Professor Papadopoulos, the article details a whirlwind of events leading up to the Ethics Committee meeting. What do you make of the last-minute changes and replacements within the committee itself?
**Professor Papadopoulos:**
**Host:** Mr. Vasiliou, do you believe these seemingly coincidental events constitute a genuine effort to ensure transparency and fairness, or could there be a more calculated strategy at play?
**Mr. Vasiliou:**
**Part 2: The Unspoken Ties and Political Obligations**
**Host:** The article highlights the personal connection between Thanasis Davakis and Antonis Samaras. Professor Papadopoulos, how common is this type of personal loyalty within political parties, and how might it influence decision-making?
**Professor Papadopoulos:**
**Host:** Mr. Vasiliou, you’ve closely followed the political landscape for years. Does the selection of Giorgos Georgantas to read the decision raise any red flags? Does his background suggest any deeper political motivations behind the choice?
**Mr. Vasiliou:**
**Part 3: Transparency and Public Trust**
**Host:** Professor Papadopoulos, this entire episode raises questions about the transparency of political processes and the influence of personal connections. What can be done to ensure greater public trust in such decisions?
**Professor Papadopoulos:**
**Host:** Mr. Vasiliou, what impact do you think this situation will have on public perception of the New Democracy party, especially within the context of broader political climate in Greece?
**Mr. Vasiliou:**
**Host:** Thank you both for sharing your invaluable insights. The events surrounding the removal of Antonis Samaras offer a fascinating glimpse into the complexities of Greek politics and the enduring influence of past allegiances. We encourage our viewers to continue engaging in this important conversation.
—-
This structure aims to:
* **Encourage discussion:** Open-ended questions prompt thoughtful responses and diverse perspectives.
* **Highlight key issues:** Each section focuses on a specific aspect, allowing for in-depth analysis.
* **Engage the audience:** The host’s introduction and closing remarks keep viewers informed and encourages further reflection.
Remember, this is just a framework. The specific responses will depend on the guests’ expertise and viewpoints.
