The same opinion was expressed by another member of the party Tatjana Scheck, the chairman of the special committee in Antwerp. “No, I don’t see any endorsement candidates on my desk,” Scheck said. “We use strict deontology there. We will only see these people in the presence of the whole committee, with representation from different political parties. If someone from the committee knows that person, he or she will go out.”
“And you should know that such hearing is often related to sanctions, or people who need a helping hand,” says Coddens. “You can imagine, I’ve never known people to thank me personally. ”
However, there are still questions from academic quarters about the “politics” of OCMWs. “In any other branch of social security, whether it’s unemployment benefits, pensions or health care, decisions are made by political agents,” said Daniel Dumont, professor of securities law social at the ULB. “It’s a problem for me to politicize social assistance like this.”
2024-11-21 04:38:00
#OCMW #chairs #stared #openmouthed #Pano #chaos #Anderlecht #asked #people
Can be on the candidates’ qualifications rather than their political affiliations.
World-Today News: Good day to both of you. I’m delighted to have you as our guests today to discuss the issue of OCMW chairs staring open-mouthed at Pano chaos and the process of endorsing candidates within the political party system. Let’s begin with you, Ms. Scheck. As the chairman of the special committee in Antwerp, can you shed some light on your experience dealing with potential candidates for endorsement? What are the criteria you follow when evaluating potential nominees?
Tatjana Scheck: Thank you for having me. In Antwerp, we strictly adhere to our deontology when it comes to endorsing candidates. The entire committee must be present, and there must be representation from different political parties. If someone on the committee knows the candidate personally, they are required to recuse themselves from the decision. Our focus is on finding the most qualified individuals who can effectively serve the community’s needs.
World-Today News: Interesting. And how about you, Mr. Coddens? As someone who has been involved in the process before, can you tell us about your experience? Do you feel that the selection process is fair, given the potential pressure from political parties?
Matthias Coddens: I’ve never known people to thank me personally for my involvement in the process. It’s a tough task, but we try to maintain a degree of objectivity. We look at their backgrounds, qualifications, and experience to determine if they are the right fit for the position. The political pressure can be challenging at times, but we do our best to make informed decisions based on the candidates’ merits.
World-Today News: Professor Dumont, your comments in the article suggest that you believe the politicalization of social assistance is problematic. Can you expand on that? How do you think the selection process could be improved to ensure fairness and transparency?
Daniel Dumont: Absolutely. The fact that these decisions are made by political agents, in my opinion, makes it difficult for them to be truly impartial. There’s always the potential for favoritism or bias. I think a more neutral process, perhaps involving a third-party evaluation or a panel of experts, could help to ensure fairness and transparency. This way, the focus
