Alfredo Jalife-Rahme
S
According to Global Times, Ukraine’s attack with US ATACMS missiles against Russia creating obstacles to Trump’s handling of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and increasing the difficulty of organizing peace talks
.
Song Zhongping (SZ) explains that “an attack by Ukraine with Western long-range weapons gives Russia enough ( sic) justification for attacking the weapons and supply lines that the West provides to Ukraine. “
SZ judges that if “Biden tries to give the most support to kyiv, it will really harm Ukraine, because these missiles cannot defeat to inflict or inflict significant damage on Russia and give Russia a reason to extend its influence on the battlefield for at least another two months (https://bit.ly/4i7MbvQ)”.
Four days after Putin’s warning, on September 12, about the nuclear consequences of launching Atacms missiles against Russia, the mega-pugnacious Republican Senator Lindsey Graham (LG) revealed the geo-economic reality – strangely , standing next to the illegitimate. president
lake (https://bit.ly/3QqemJr) Zelensky and Kiev -: They are sitting on trillions of dollars worth of their mines that could be good for our economy.
; lo all they have is weapons
.
Already 3 months earlier in his interview with CBS, LG had announced that “Ukraine is sitting on a gold mine ( sic). They are sitting on 10 to 12 trillion dollars worth of critical minerals. It is probably the richest country in all of Europe (sic). And I don’t want ( sic) to provide that money and those assets for Putin to share with China.” He added that It’s a good deal, as Ukraine concludes. Let’s help them win the war we can’t lose.
and “it would be foolish to share with China (https://bit.ly/4fBqoL8)”.
LG overlooked, in contrast to its sterile cacophony, the silent majority
The United States would give a terrible mandate two months later to Trump, who swept the electoral vote that gave him the presidency, the majority in the Senate and the House of Representatives, the popular vote and, in addition on that, control of the High Court of Justice.
Today, the big losers on November 5th are the predatory collectors George Soros, BlackRock, Bill Gates, etc. (https://bit.ly/4hV02W8) Already at the time I pointed out a global choreography of BlackRock and JPMorgan Chase investments to rebuild the fund ( sic)” from Ukraine (https://bit.ly/40PV72E).
The book is worth checking out. Blackrock’s Secret Empire (https://bit.ly/3ZgaBvq).
After Vice President-elect JD Vance threw Zelensky under the bus and Trump expressed his willingness to promote peace between Russia and Ukraine, BlackRock and its partners to the side They went into a financial panic after suffering huge losses on the untransferred deposits. That is why, perhaps, his friends in the intelligence services in the Deep state filter in The Washington Post (WP), alleged CIA oracle, the megafake news that Trump had spoken to his counterpart Putin about giving Ukraine (https://bit.ly/48WHkcE).
Such fake news from the WP was equivalent to a long-term disinfectant missile and it is now followed seven days later by the Atacms against Russia.
Three scenarios of Russia’s response appear from the lowest probability to the highest: 1. The start of the Third Nuclear War; 2. Self-control and the Russian situation, and 3. Wisely wait for Trump to come to power on January 20 (https://bit.ly/3OiP6UO).
The Democratic Party entertains Brzezinski’s old axioms, while the new allies, who have always been false, are the Republicans who have won before – Cheney (father and daughter), the Bush dynasty, John Bolton, etc. – were hostages to Britain Halford McKinder.
Who won on November 5 in the USA: Putin or Trump or both? There is no geopolitical creativity in the West that is still anchored in 117-year-old nihilistic schemes ( sic) years used by the adherents to confess jaguar from Brzezinski: the very abstract rookies Jacobo Jeremías Sullivan, national security adviser, and Antony Blinken, secretary of state.
How could Ukraine’s deployment of US ATACMS missiles reshape the dynamics of military engagements between Russia and Ukraine, and what might this mean for future peace negotiations?
1. As an expert on geopolitics, Mr. Jalife-Rahme, can you explain the potential implications of Ukraine’s recent use of US ATACMS missiles on the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, as well as on peace talks between the two nations? How might this development affect the balance of power and diplomatic efforts in the region?
2. Song Zhongping believes that an attack with Western long-range weapons could give Russia justification for attacking Ukraine’s weapons and supply lines. Do you agree with this assertion? Additionally, how might the prospect of Ukraine gaining access to such powerful tools influence the trajectory of the conflict?
3. Senator Lindsey Graham’s recent comments about Ukraine’s mineral wealth and potential geo-economic importance have raised some eyebrows. What role do you see for natural resources playing in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine? Moreover, do you think there is any merit to leveraging these resources for economic or strategic gains?
4. It appears that there are opposing viewpoints within the US government regarding Ukraine’s role in global politics and the ongoing conflict. How does this disagreement impact policy decisions and negotiation efforts with Russia?
5. The book ‘Blackrock’s Secret Empire’ highlights the financial interests at play in the conflict. How might these interests shape the decisions made by both sides of the conflict, and what role do you see for multinational corporations in shaping geopolitical events?
6. There have been recent concerns about potential nuclear escalation in the conflict. What steps can be taken to avoid this outcome, and how might international players like the US and Russia work together to deescalate the situation?
7. As the world awaits the outcome of the US presidential election, what impact do you think the result will have on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine? Will a Trump presidency lead to different diplomatic approaches or increased tensions?
