“I am very happy, it is one of the best actresses in this country, had never attended” explained David Broncanothis Monday, to give way to Carmen Machi as a guest of The Revolt. “Now I will ask you what has happened other times,” he added about the fact that in more than 1,000 programs (adding The Resistance) would never have accepted the invitation.
Carmen Machi, the inspector of ‘Celeste’: “The Treasury does not think about bitching you, you bitch Spain for not leaving money here”
Just entering, the actress commented the same thing when she saw the enthusiasm of the theater and the team: “How have I not come before?” And the presenter insisted on it. “In eight seasons we have invited you many times”. And the actress responded, laughing: “I didn’t want to come because this is a job. You come here and you have to be at your level. It seems like you don’t do anything but you are very smart.”
After that, he also shed light on the reason for agreeing on this occasion: “I came because my father, who is 92 years old, is a big fan of the program.. And even if he doesn’t come, I do see him.” And he added another reason: “We’re supposed to come to promote something, but the last thing you do is promote,” he joked.
Upon hearing such a complaint, Broncano promised to put more focus on Celeste, the Movistar Plus+ series that he came to promote. However, the actress herself surprised by throwing stones at her own roof, when she continued arguing her refusal to come earlier.
It was when Machi remembered a job he shared with Javier Cámara and Broncano pointed out that he had never agreed to go as a guest either. She made a suspicious face and the presenter noted that “he had information” about such a refusal:
“I think what happens to me is what happens to me,” the actress ended up revealing. “Nothing really happens to us, but it was also because… when you were in Movistar you didn’t have an audience. Now yes. “It’s just not the same.” Moment in which Broncano pointed out: “Sorry, the series you are promoting now is from Movistar”.
An argument that the presenter corrected: “On the platform itself, fewer people saw it, but many people saw us on the internet,” and she rectified it.
Finally, Machi ended up sending a message to Rafa Nadal, reading article 47 of the Constitution on the right to housing, ensuring that he likes Broncano “very well” and even asking to “come back soon.”
1. Could you provide an overview of the disagreement between Macarena Aguayo and Javier Cámara on their participation in the El Hormiguero TV show? What were their main points of contention?
2. What was the context for Broncano’s revelation that the series they were currently promoting was also available on Movistar+, despite its lower viewership numbers on the platform? How did Aguayo respond to this information?
3. How did the argument escalate further after Aguayo mentioned that fewer people saw them on Movistar+ but many saw them on social media? How did Broncano attempt to clarify his statement and how did Aguayo respond?
4. what was the humorous way in which Aguayo concluded her argument with Broncano by referencing Rafa Nadal and the Spanish Constitution?
