2024.11.18 05:28 Taipei time
Zyxel insists that the 70 million equipment is part of the building, but lawyers say that the foreclosure of buildings often leads to criminal disputes, but the police usually only send officers to the site to settle the matter, or notify both parties to attend the event. police station at an optional date transferred by the police in accordance with the law, and the investigation process of the Second Brigade was handled according to the instructions of the prosecutor and was arrested or arrested for current crimes for investigation .
At the mediation meeting in October, Zyxel asked Li Jianwei to hand over 10.9 million yuan?” Zyxel’s lawyer was at a loss for words and asked Li: “What would it cost sell that equipment to Zyxel?” Li said that Zyxel obviously also knew that this batch of equipment was 100% owned by him, but after he refused to buy or sell, Zyxel’s lawyer actually sued him for threatening his money. take, and now you want to buy, and now you want to sue, the logic is very different!
The Science Park Administration issued an official document confirming that the equipment in the Qiao Xin factory belonged to Li Jianwei. (provided by readers)
Li Jianwei’s lawyer, Lin Tailiang, pointed out that there are complex legal relationships and high risks in advocating for “no settlement”, “partial settlement, partial settlement”, which often leads to harassment, coercion, damage, injury, etc. usually after the parties report the crime, the police will send at least 1 or 2 police officers to the scene to resolve the matter, or inform both parties to go to the police station on a selected date No one does this like Lin Jianhong!
Lin Tailiang confirmed that Li Jianwei received the “tenure cut” and the “execution order and execution transcript” issued by the Miaoli District Court, which said that Li “could recover at any time” the movable property awarded to him by the court, and there were no criminal cases such as trespassing into his residence.
Lin Tailiang said that Lin Jianhong ordered 12 kidnappings and arrested Li Jianwei and others, which may involve the crime of coercion by a civil servant under the guise of his official position, the crime of depriving a civil servant of freedom of movement under the law. It is very bad and I ask the police not to break the law.
The Science Park Administration issued an official document confirming that the equipment in the Qiao Xin factory belonged to Li Jianwei. (provided by readers)
Lin Jianhong replied through the secretary’s office
(1) The police do not intervene in civil disputes If the general public or representatives of public opinion, companies, trades or enterprises report to the police that they have been victimized or that they have violated the law, the police will take over the case and send personnel to the scene to deal with it.
(2) Our organization does not know about the two companies, and the so-called coverage is not true. according to the law.
(3) The jurisdiction of our organization covers the whole of Taiwan. Any subsequent situation at the scene will be handled by the second team of this group. is arrested with an active crime or a subsequent evidence collection letter is sent to the District Attorney’s Office for investigation.
★Mirror Weekly reminds you that anyone should be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to the law.
Update the time |2024.11.18 05:29 Taipei time
More content is welcome Mirror Weekly print magazine、Weekly Mirror Digital Subscription、Learn about content licensing.
2024-11-18 05:27:00
#Geàrdan #tèarainteachd #bhith #nan #luchdgleidhidh #dorais #3Lin #Jianhong #leader #security #team #accused #profiteering #property #owners #extorting #legal #creditors #responded #Mirror #Media
How does the presence of private security forces, like Lin Jianhong’s, affect public perceptions of justice in civil disputes?
D questions to explore the different facets of the issue:
1. How does the involvement of a security team, led by Lin Jianhong, change the dynamics of the property dispute between Li Jianwei and Zyxel?
2. What are the potential legal implications for Lin Jianhong and his team members if they are found to have profited from the property dispute through extortion or other illegal means?
3. What role does Li Jianwei’s refusal to sell the disputed equipment play in escalating the situation? How might it have been different had he been willing to negotiate?
4. Do you believe that private security teams should have any involvement in civil disputes between parties? If so, under what circumstances?
5. How can law enforcement ensure that individuals like Li Jianwei are protected from harassment and intimidation during these types of disputes, while also preventing abuse of power by security teams?