The CEO of Grove Street Games, the original studio behind GTA Trilogy: The Definitive Edition, is not happy that the developer was dropped from the game’s credits. Rockstart Games removed the name of the studio during the recent update, which restores the original graphical atmosphere of the games.
Last week, Rockstar Games launched an amazing update for GTA Trilogy: The Definitive Edition. GTA III as well as Vice City and San Andreas received several improvements, including a return to the graphic tone of the original games. One of the biggest changes: Rockstar Games removed the Grove Street Games logo from each game’s splash screen. Surprisingly enough, the studio staff is still present in the final series.
The update caused bad blood with Grove Street Games CEO Thomas Williamson, who was unaware of the change. Through X he criticizes Rockstar because the logo has been removed. In addition, he writes that Grove Street Games was responsible for many fixes in the latest update.
Speaking entirely hypothetically: It’s a dick move to remove primary developers from credits in an update, especially when an update involves hundreds of fixes provided by those developers that stayed out of players’ hands for years.
— Thomas Williamson (@TSWilliamson) November 14, 2024
So Williamson claims that Grove Street Games is responsible for all the settings in the latest update, but that Rockstar Games kept them on purpose to fine-tune the game itself with graphical updates. However, we should not forget that the original condition of the trilogy at the time of launch was quite disastrous. Rockstar Games obviously wanted more control. What do you think?
2024-11-18 02:06:00
#GTA #Trilogy #studio #removed #credits #dick #move
What sparked the controversy surrounding the removal of Grove Street Games’ name from the credits of GTA Trilogy: The Definitive Edition?
Question 1: Hello there, I’d like to introduce myself as the website editor for world-today-news.com. Thank you both for joining me today to discuss this controversial topic regarding the removal of Grove Street Games’ name from the credits of GTA Trilogy: The Definitive Edition. Could you please introduce yourselves and provide your role in this matter?
Question 2: To begin, Thomas, can you tell us what your reaction was upon discovering that the Grove Street Games logo was removed from the recent update of GTA Trilogy: The Definitive Edition?
Question 3: Following the launch of the update, many speculated that Rockstar Games wanted more control over the game’s graphical direction. As the CEO of Grove Street Games, do you think this was the main reason for your removal from the credits?
Question 4: It’s interesting to note that a number of changes in the latest update were implemented by Grove Street Games. William, can you expand on this further? How involved were you in the initial launch of the trilogy and what improvements or fixes were made by your team for the recent update?
Question 5: There has been some confusion surrounding the roles of both studios in the development of the games. Thomas, could you clarify how much input Grove Street Games had in the original launch of the trilogy and if there were any major issues that necessitated Rockstar Games taking over development as some have suggested?
Question 6: William, do you think it’s fair for Grove Street Games to feel slighted by Rockstar Games’ decision to remove them from the credits, considering the extensive work they had done for the franchise?
Question 7: Many players have expressed their frustration with the original launch of the trilogy, citing various technical issues. As the company responsible for bringing these beloved games to modern consoles, how do you both feel about balancing fan expectations with the realities of game development?
Question 8: Moving forward, what can fans expect from both of your studios in terms of future projects? Will there be any collaboration or potential for reconciliation regarding GTA Trilogy: The Definitive Edition?
Question 9: Lastly, is there anything else you’d like to add or address regarding this ongoing debate?
