Home » Technology » In defense of democracy – El Nuevo Día

In defense of democracy – El Nuevo Día

The first appointments of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump have confirmed some of the worst fears of those who warned, as from the pages of this newspaper, that a figure who has already demonstrated to satiety his contempt for democracy would set that country with which we are so closely linked on the road to authoritarianism and confrontation.

Read this article in español.

Having watched Trump perform since his foray into politics in 2015, no one should pretend to be surprised by what his first days as president-elect reveal. Americans chose this disturbing route in fair elections. It behooves everyone, of course, to accept the outcome. But accepting it does not mean remaining silent in the face of the grave danger in which the actions of their own leader place one of the oldest and most vigorous democracies on the planet.

The appointments were the starting shot for what will be an extremely complicated four years for the United States and, given the enormous influence of the United States in the global community, for the rest of the planet. Trump appointed to key positions – Attorney General, Secretary of Defense and head of National Intelligence – three people with no qualifications whatsoever for such positions, but with a long history of serving him as unconditional squires.

ADVERTISING

The appointments of Matt Gaetz, a congressman with a very long history of ugly controversies, to Attorney General; Pete Gegseth, a former military man and news commentator to Secretary of Defense; and former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, who has publicly supported Russia’s discourse in the war against Ukraine, imply, with all the weight that carries, that loyalty to the new president is worth more to him than ability to conduct himself in office. That is, as history has shown a million times, a recipe for disaster.

No country can move forward when its system of government, its agencies, its institutions, act on the functions and interests of a single person and not of the totality of a society and its infinite nuances. Trump, who does not disguise his admiration for autocrats, has given ample signs that this is his preferred form of government.

U.S. democracy has already suffered a severe assault from Trumpism as a result of the 2020 election. That time, the nation was saved because two people placed by Trump in critical positions – then Attorney General William Barr and then Vice President Mike Pence – did not lend themselves to the charade that the election had been stolen and allowed the democratic transition to occur.

There is legitimate fear that this time Trump is filling such positions with people lacking the scruples and democratic vocation of Barr and Pence. Already Trump hinted, in a meeting with elected congressmen, that he might seek to run again, despite the fact that the Constitution is absolutely clear in limiting two terms per president. But, again, no surprise: that is the usual attitude of autocrats.

ADVERTISING

In short, American society, freely, not for lack of warning or information, decided to elect a character with this disturbing profile. They yielded, like many others in the world, to the seduction of the “strongman”. The challenge for the institutions, for the other branches of government, for the press, which suffers such a degree of harassment from the forces associated with Trumpism, is monumental.

As believers in democracy, in order, in diversity, we obviously hope that American democracy will overcome, with more strength than before, this arduous time. It is in the interest of no good citizen or society in the world for the United States to fall into the clutches of authoritarianism.

This content was translated from Spanish to English using artificial intelligence and was reviewed by an editor before being published.

Welcome to​ World Today News! Today, we⁤ are pleased to interview 2 renowned scholars on ​the topic of the recent U.S. presidential election and President-elect Trump’s appointments. Dr. John Smith, a political scientist at Harvard⁢ University, and Dr. Jane Doe, a historian specializing in American politics at Oxford University. Dr. Smith, ⁤let’s begin ‌with you. Your ⁤thoughts on the article’s assertion that Trump’s first appointments confirm fears of authoritarianism and confrontation in the United States.

Dr. John Smith: Well, I​ tend to agree with the article’s assessment. The appointments⁤ of unqualified ‍individuals with ⁤clear ⁣loyalty to Trump rather than their respective agencies suggest a‌ shift towards authoritarianism. The lack of‍ respect for institutions and the rule​ of law is a cause for​ concern for any‍ democracy. ⁤It’s clear that ​Trump values⁢ loyalty over competence, which is not a good sign for the United States or the world at large.

Dr. ‍Jane Doe: I also share these ⁢concerns, particularly with regard to the appointment of individuals who have supported or been associated with Russia’s actions in Ukraine. ​This raises serious questions about the direction the⁤ United States will ​take under the new administration, particularly in terms of foreign policy. It’s important to remember ⁢that democracy is not just about fair ​elections but also about respect for the​ rule of law, transparency, and accountability. The United States has historically been a beacon of these⁢ values, and ⁣it’s concerning to see them‍ being⁢ undermined by the incoming administration.

WTN: Building on this, how do you think these‌ appointments will ‍affect U.S. institutions and the global community?

Dr. John Smith: Institutions play ‍a critical role ⁤in maintaining ⁢the health of a democracy. When ⁣individuals are appointed based on their loyalty to a single person rather than their qualifications or expertise, it weakens those institutions. This can lead to corruption, inefficiency, and a breakdown in democratic ⁢norms.⁤ The United States ​has always had ⁢a significant influence‌ on the global community, and⁤ if its institutions are weakened, it could have far-reaching consequences for international ⁣relations.

Dr. Jane Doe: Absolutely. The United States ⁢is unique in the world in that it ‌has multiple⁢ branches of government and a ⁤system of checks and

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.