by Alberto Zorzi
The president of the Venice court, Salvatore Laganà: «The judge’s conduct is immune from any censorship, unfounded and exploitative controversies»
«I believe that the conduct of giudice process assignee be immune from any censorshiphaving been the rejection of the instance of postponement at all motivated e according to to the well-known and consolidated jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Cassation”. The president of the court of Venice Salvatore Laganàbefore expressing himself, he waited to receive «a broad relationship» by the magistrate accused by the Genoese lawyer Federica Tartaraeight months pregnant, for not having granted her the legitimate impediment in a hearing held on Tuesday, which then ended with the discussion of a trial and the sentencing of his clients. Episode for which the lawyer also decided to present a exhibited at the CSMcalling it a “very serious fact”.
The legal assignment assumed 4 days after the hearing
Laganà, however, defends his colleague, as does her Venetian council of the Anm. In fact, he explains that that process, linked toembezzlement of two pianoshad been going on since 2022 and it had been postponed several times due to problems salute of a accused; furthermore the defender era changed per am seven timeswith 4 trusted lawyers (Tartara last) and three ex officio. The Genoese lawyer had took the job on November 8, four days earlier of the discussion hearing, knowing full well – this is the president’s thesis – that he would not have been able to exercise it. For this reason the prosecutor and the civil party were also there opposed to the postponement to March asked by the hearing deputy, who was then “forced” to discuss the trial. «The judge’s choice to suspend the hearing and to agree on the time for the discussion, in a case without difficulties and with a very limited investigation, nevertheless guaranteed the balancing of the defense needs», Laganà cuts short.
«Unfounded and exploitative controversy»
The ANM also explains that already at the end of September and the end of October, just before two other hearings, the defendants had changed lawyers and that this was the third time. «The controversy and the threat of exposure appear completely unfounded e instrumental – writes the Venetian council – The Venice court has always been attentive to the issue of maternity and working women».
Go to all the news of Venice Mestre
Subscribe to the Corriere del Veneto newsletter
November 15, 2024 (changed November 15, 2024 | 09:15)
