Home » Sport » Referee decisions left their mark last night! Big debate: Why did you take him to Galatasaray? | Samet Akaydin’s goal is clean | In the Besiktas match…

Referee decisions left their mark last night! Big debate: Why did you take him to Galatasaray? | Samet Akaydin’s goal is clean | In the Besiktas match…

Date Created: November 11, 2024 08:49news-rate" />

Our writer Fırat Aydınus evaluated the controversial situation of the matches Fenerbahçe – Sivasspor, Galatasaray – Samsunspor and Başakşehir – Beşiktaş.

class=”medyanet-inline-adv”>

Trendyol Super LeagueThe 12th week saw 3 critical games. While they faced Galatasaray in the 16.00 session, Fenerbahçe – Sivasspor and Başakşehir – Beşiktaş matches were played at 19.00.

Galatasaray defeated its opponent 3-2 in the match that saw a great struggle and maintained its leadership. On the other hand, Fenerbahçe defeated the host Sivasspor 4-0 and rose to 2nd place. There was no goal in the match between Başakşehir and Beşiktaş.

Management of the match referees, sport While it caused a public debate, our writer Fırat Aydınus examined the decisions minute by minute.

Here are Aydınus’ assessments:

GALATASARAY – SAMSUNSPOR

SUMMARY 21: There is interference in the Torreira-Ntcham fight in the penalty area of ​​Galatasaray If the referee gives a penalty, nobody can say anything. VAR could not prevent it.

class=”medyanet-inline-adv”>

news-fullwith-img">
news-fullwith-block">

SUMMARY 48: In the Sanchez-Dimata fight, the referee gave an incorrect penalty due to his position. There, Sanchez does not charge Dimata with a shoulder on his back. Fight side by side; There is no need for punishment.

news-fullwith-img">
news-fullwith-block">Referee decisions left their mark last night! Big debate: Why did you take him to Galatasaray? | Samet Akaydin’s goal is clean | In the Besiktas match…

GARDEN 88: Nelsson’s interference against Soner is not a move requiring a penalty. If the referee had passed it on the field, he would have said ‘OK’ and with respect, but it was not a situation where VAR would have intervened.

news-fullwith-img">
news-fullwith-block">The referee's decisions left their mark last night. Big debate: Why did you give it to Galatasaray | Samet Akaydin's goal is clean | In the Besiktas match...

WHY GAVE MELER TO G.SARAY?

I ask MHK: Why are you assigning Halil Umut Meler to the Galatasaray match, putting people in a difficult situation and leaving question marks in their minds? At least don’t assign Meler, who clearly needs mental rest, to Galatasaray games! Things are not going well for Meler in Turkey. Bad decisions, bad frustration, incredible disciplinary and technical errors … Emre Kargın, who was in the VAR, was a VAR referee so incompetent that he kept the referee and the match waiting by intervening -unnecessary incomes.

class=”medyanet-inline-adv”>

in season GalatasarayI said that 3 of the 4 penalties given were wrong, and 2 more were added yesterday. Meler was the VAR referee in the two wrong penalty decisions in the Adana Demir-Galatasaray match.

BAŞAKŞEHİR – BEŞİKTAŞ

Camera angles are very inappropriate

SUMMARY 10: The ball that Uduokhai receives in the penalty area is open to debate. The arm is not in a natural position, but it is necessary to confirm whether it has been pushed beforehand or whether it is fake.

GARDEN 23: The broadcaster’s camera angles cannot provide a healthy explanation for the intervention made against Rafa. Penalty if Ömer Ali did not touch the ball while stepping in front of Rafa.

news-fullwith-img">
news-fullwith-block">The referee's decisions left their mark last night. Big debate: Why did you give it to Galatasaray | Samet Akaydin's goal is clean | In the Besiktas match...

class=”medyanet-inline-adv”>

SUMMARY 75: The ball reaches the closed arm of Masuaku in the penalty area, the decision to continue is correct.

SUMMARY 90 + 3: I’m close to a penalty for the interference on Rashica, but the camera angles were not the kind that VAR would give evidence.

news-fullwith-img">
news-fullwith-block">The referee's decisions left their mark last night. Big debate: Why did you give it to Galatasaray | Samet Akaydin's goal is clean | In the Besiktas match...

FENERBAHCE – SIVASPOR

WHITE SAMET IS PURE

SUMMARY 24: VAR intervention by Sarper Barış Saka in the situation before Samet Akaydin’s goal at Fenerbahçe was meaningless. There is a hit as the arm comes down, it is right to give the goal. If Alexander Djiku had shot and scored, he would have been sent off.

news-fullwith-img">
news-fullwith-block">The referee's decisions left their mark last night. Big debate: Why did you give it to Galatasaray | Samet Akaydin's goal is clean | In the Besiktas match...

SUMMARY 52: Although goalkeeper Djordje Nikolic has a little contact with the ball in Youssef En-Nesyri’s position in the Sivas penalty area, the situation continues to the feet with both hands. The situation is a punishment.

class=”medyanet-inline-adv”>

news-fullwith-img">
news-fullwith-block">The referee's decisions left their mark last night. Big debate: Why did you give it to Galatasaray | Samet Akaydin's goal is clean | In the Besiktas match...

NO MINUTES 82: It is open to interpretation whether Dusan Tadic’s position was offside or not before the goal scored by Sofyan Amrabat from Fenerbahçe; I want to be upside down. VAR should have called the referee, watched it, and the referee should have made the final decision. Because I think that the direction of the ball and Tadic blocking the goalkeeper’s view affected the action, although it was a small one.

news-fullwith-img">
news-fullwith-block">The referee's decisions left their mark last night. Big debate: Why did you give it to Galatasaray | Samet Akaydin's goal is clean | In the Besiktas match...

2024-11-11 05:49:00
#Referee #decisions #left #mark #night #Big #debate #Galatasaray #Samet #Akaydins #goal #clean #Besiktas #match..

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.