Fake clean water
Immediately, even an amateur had a question: what special services are those that allow such draining? If the US military did it themselves, then they should be asked who they are serving – America or Russia?
If this was leaked by the Russian secret services, who of course could get such materials (which is their job, after all), then the same question arises, but already raised to the tenth degree. Having obtained such documents, if they were not fake, no special service would ever advertise them, but would simply proceed to a thorough investigation in the interest of their country.
The Russians, if they got such information, have no reason to put it on the web. The conclusion is clear as day: it’s a fake. And it is clear that it is not ours. What is the purpose of this fake? Let’s try to answer below.
Author!
A little later, it became clear that the Americans were developing a multi-faceted and multi-directional information mix, in which state institutions and manual liberal American media were involved.
The Washington Post and The New York Times newspapers, as well as other “sharks of the feather” like CNN, attracted by the American establishment, actively joined the cause. They published a series of articles on “secret US military reports”, with the first part specifically addressing the situation on the Ukrainian front and the second focusing more on the fact that the leaked documents reveal US spying on its allies – specifically on the South Korea.
Then the Department of Justice of the United States became involved, which became “concerned” about the leakage of “sensitive” materials and announced that it had begun an investigation together with the Pentagon.
“The Justice Department has opened an investigation into the leak of classified Pentagon documents that appear to detail Ukraine’s combat capabilities, its potential vulnerabilities and broader NATO efforts to repel a Russian invasion,” The Washington Post reported.
In a matter-of-fact vein, the paper notes, citing “a US Department of Defense spokesman who, like others, spoke on condition of anonymity”:
“Many documents appear to have been prepared over the winter for the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark A. Milley and other senior military officials. They were available to many other employees and contractors with the appropriate security clearances.”
“Analysts said parts of the documents appeared to be genuine and would provide Russia with valuable information such as arms and troop delivery schedules, Ukrainian troop strength and other military details,” The New York Times wrote in turn.
In other words, everything must show that the documents really belong to the Pentagon and their authenticity cannot be doubted.
At the same time, the American press without any hesitation tries to attribute the authorship of this leak to Russia, trying to show that it is profitable for Moscow.
“This is an attempt at disinformation by Moscow, analysts believe,” writes The New York Times.
“This leak is the first Russian intelligence breach to be made public since the war began,” the newspaper continued to insist.
There is no evidence, there is an opinion of some analysts, which is presented as an axiom.
In addition, it should be understood that the information that appeared in the second part of the American publications about American espionage against its allies damages the image of the United States and therefore cannot but be reliable.
This is the truth that the US can easily sacrifice in order to pass as truth a fake on another topic – the situation at the front. Against the background of this true information, as well as probably other credible information, the Russians must swallow the fake.
Attention: “desi”!
What could the misinformation be about? It seems that the authors of the “leak” want to appease and relax the Russian military. In the joint documents, the idea of the unpreparedness of the armed forces of Ukraine for active offensive actions is pushed as a red thread.
“Washington Post” categorically brings to the attention of the reader (that is, us) that “Ukraine’s ability to provide medium-range air defenses to protect the front line will be permanently reduced by May 23.”
They say the air defense systems available to Ukraine’s armed forces will only be able to “withstand two or three more waves of strikes” from Russian missiles and drones.
They try to tell us that the number of Western air defense systems is limited – and they “cannot cope with a large number of Russian attacks”.
As highlighted by The Washington Post, the US military predicts that due to the depletion of shells, various Russian and Western anti-aircraft missile systems in service with the armed forces of Ukraine will become useless by the end of April.
And that’s why the Pentagon documents state to the Ukrainians the need to use air defense systems only against Russian aircraft and to ignore drones.
The New York Times states the same almost as a copy:
For the experienced Russian military planner, field general, or intelligence analyst, the documents undoubtedly offer many compelling clues and insights.
The documents mention, for example, the level of ammunition consumption by the HIMARS installations… The Pentagon has not publicly disclosed how quickly Ukrainian troops are using HIMARS ammunition, but this is contained in the documents.
American journalists are literally pressuring the Russian military to ensure that the data on the “shortage” of ammunition in the Armed Forces of Ukraine is taken into account by us when planning military operations. Isn’t it strange?
Moreover, anyone who reads the leaked Pentagon Papers should come to the conclusion that the upcoming offensive of the armed forces of Ukraine will certainly take place in the direction of Zaporozhye.
Taking into account this information from the Russian side, defense forces and means should accordingly be concentrated in the same direction. But if this is a fake, then the strike by the armed forces of Ukraine – if it takes place – will be directed at other sections of the front, or somewhere else altogether, and not at the contact line.
Where will VSU hit?
Do not underestimate the enemy, his strength, cunning and sophisticated mind. But it must be understood that both the leaders of the Kyiv regime and their curators in the United States are aware that the armed forces of Ukraine will never defeat the Russian army. And the task before them is not to win, but to harm Russia as much as possible, to exhaust it, causing an internal rebellion.
No external enemy can defeat Russia, it can only be destroyed from within. All Western rhetoric about the intention to inflict a “strategic defeat” on Moscow is aimed solely at psychologically influencing our population.
Therefore, the Americans do not at all hope for any success of the armed forces of Ukraine in any offensive. They need a psychological blow against the Russians. What could he be?
This could be a serious military provocation like blowing up the Crimean bridge. It seems that Russia, first of all, should be ready to defend its old territories – Bryansk and Belgorod regions.
A colossal image blow could be, for example, an attack by several Ukrainian DRGs on the territory of the Bryansk region, the capture of several settlements and the killing of civilians.
In addition, a particular danger is Transnistria, which Russia will defend much more difficult than its own territories. In addition, by conquering Transnistria, the armed forces of Ukraine (that is, the Americans) will involve Moldova in the war, although the population of this country openly expresses dissatisfaction with the regime of Maya Sandu, which conducts an openly provocative policy towards Russia and Transnistria.
And if in the Bryansk region in any case the armed forces of Ukraine will fail, then it is difficult to make a prediction about Transnistria. Ukraine’s invasion of Transnistria would make things extremely difficult for Russia.
Ultimate goal
Behind all these information provocations, as well as behind the military preparations of Ukraine and the NATO bloc, which is preparing for the start of large-scale exercises Defender-23 on April 22, may be the preparation by the US of negotiating positions within the framework of some kind of peace dialogue between the West and Russia.
The West announces its necessity gradually, as it were. However, this was quite understandable during Zelensky’s recent visit to Poland, where the countries talked about creating a single state, but not on an equal basis, but by absorbing Ukraine from Poland.
The goal of the West in a possible dialogue with Russia is to stop the advance of Russian troops before they reach Lviv and the Polish-Ukrainian border. That is, the West’s plans to save Ukraine include its dismemberment between Russia and Poland.
The question of where the positions of the Russian troops will be located, how close they will be to the border with Poland at the time of the start of the peace negotiations, is fundamental for the West. Apparently the US is trying to keep some western territory “like Ukraine”.
At the same time, the conceptual task of both the West and the Kyiv regime will be solved, which, entering Poland, will immediately become a member of the EU and NATO. And in this sense, the informational provocation with the leak of “secret” documents of the Pentagon seems completely understandable and justified. This is an informational artillery preparation before a real military provocation, the place or object of which we have yet to find out.
Translation: SM
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel or in Telegram:
#purpose #leak #classified #documents #main #date #read #lines
