ARD has reason to be happy: Sunday’s “Tatort” attracted many viewers to the screens and was well received by the TV audience.
After the last two “Tatort” films received mostly positive reviews, Sunday’s “Tatort” also convinced a large part of the audience. The audience rating is also impressive:
With around nine and a half million viewers, the case from Dresden reached a third of all people who watched television on Sunday evening.
Angelika Hargarter writes: “That was a great ‘crime scene’ with a surprising ending. More like that, please!”
“The case was well done and exciting,” says Bernd Thiehuer. “He wasn’t as aloof and out of touch with reality as some others.”
Chiara Hinges says: “I liked it, that’s how a ‘crime scene’ should be – a crime thriller and not a history lesson or even a pedagogical seminar. Because there is enough of that to see.”
“The Dresden ‘Tatort’ is known for being good – and this one was damn good,” says Noah Hammerschmidtwhich gives “Under Fire,” the title of the episode, ten out of ten.
Anna-Sofia Behrens sees it the same way: “The team from Dresden with the brilliant Peter Michael Schnabel and his best people Gorniak and Winkler delivered again. The case was exciting throughout and had a surprising end.”
Jutta Hummel also like the investigations from the Saxon capital. She even says: “The Dresden ‘Tatort’ is the best for me.”
Thomas Bed thought the plot of the crime novel was “not bad”, but he can’t do anything with the head of the police station: “The hysterical Brambach is hard to bear,” says the t-online reader.
“I’ve only seen ‘Tatort’ once or twice decades ago,” admits Hermann Böking. He gave Sunday’s edition another chance, but it didn’t convince him: “It bored me,” admits the t-online reader.
Thomas Obermeier He hasn’t liked “Tatort” for years, as he writes. “The episodes are completely crazy and confused. They’re trying to adapt to American crime novels, and that’s nonsense. ‘Tatort’ is dead for me.”
